• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

BREAKING NEWS: Syria and Iran pledge to confront US and Israel

SPKTDI

New member
Joined
Feb 15, 2007
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
From: The Daily Internet

By:Sean Kane

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad met today in Tehran for a 2-day meeting aimed at re-strengthening ties between the 2 middle eastern countries

This is the Syrian leader's second trip since 2005 to Iran to meet with

Among the discussions, both leaders pledged to confront US and Israeli "plots" in the middle east.

Al-Assad said: "We should co-operate and work to make the public aware of the sinister aims of the United States and the Zionists."

The presidents criticized how the US and Israel have destabalized the region and also stated the dangers in a Lebanese and Iraqi civil war.

Al-Assad said: "Iran and Syria support the peoples of the region and the enemies will only reach their goals by creating pessimism and disunity amongst Muslims."

Ahmadinejad agreed:Ahmadinejad agreed that the region "should be careful about the enemies' efforts to create division and conflict amongst Muslims and make sure they do not reach their sinister goals

"Under the current conditions it is necessary that Islamic countries preserve their vigilance, unity and wisdom to prevent the establishment of new conspiracies."

Al-Assad is intended to meet Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei tomorrow.
 
While it may not be surprising, it is a large step in the wrong direction.
 
While it may not be surprising, it is a large step in the wrong direction.

Yeah, like if Islamic forces had overthrown the US government and occupied our country, and the Mexican President Felipe Calderón met with the Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, to discuss restrengthening ties between the two nations and stabilizing the region.
Yeah, I'll bet the hypothetical occupying Islamic forces wouldn't like that too much, either. Hypothetically speaking.
 
Yeah, like if Islamic forces had overthrown the US government and occupied our country, and the Mexican President Felipe Calderón met with the Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, to discuss restrengthening ties between the two nations and stabilizing the region.
Yeah, I'll bet the hypothetical occupying Islamic forces wouldn't like that too much, either. Hypothetically speaking.


"Stabilizing", huh?

so I take it that's an "aye" vote for killing women for "honor", mutillating and then killing homosexuals, and establishing a viscious, worldwide totalitarian state.

Good to know where everybody stands.
 
"Stabilizing", huh?

so I take it that's an "aye" vote for killing women for "honor", mutillating and then killing homosexuals, and establishing a viscious, worldwide totalitarian state.

Good to know where everybody stands.

There are many oppressing countries out there. Some in more dire need of worldwide attention. Since you seem to feel so strongly about this, are you ticked that your current administration is ignoring the horrors of Sudan?
 
Moderator's Warning:
For future reference, linking to your own blog as a news source does not fit the standard for the Breaking News forum. Please refrain from this in the future.
 
Yeah so Syria = sunnis , and Iran = Shia. Thats both sides of Islam, plus the 9/11 boys came from Saudi Arabia. Not really making friends out there are we? Or is that irrelevant?
 
Yeah so Syria = sunnis , and Iran = Shia. Thats both sides of Islam, plus the 9/11 boys came from Saudi Arabia. Not really making friends out there are we? Or is that irrelevant?

Because the US was held in the highest esteem across the middle east before the Iraq War.:roll:
 
Yes and still the US has been up to its neck in it since the 50s. I wonder, why would they want to give themselves such trouble? Is it the clear blue skies? The beautiful sand dunes, the atmospheric music and the sense of the exotic? Perhaps its the love of those amazing creatures called Camels, the ships of the desert. No? then whatever could it be?
 
There are many oppressing countries out there. Some in more dire need of worldwide attention. Since you seem to feel so strongly about this, are you ticked that your current administration is ignoring the horrors of Sudan?

My administration? I didn't even vote for Bush.

You do realize it is possible to disagree with the Bush administration and not support the Mullahs, don't you? You probably haven't figured that out by the looks of it.

And yes, I wish more were being done about the horrors in Sudan. Thanks for asking.
 
There are many oppressing countries out there. Some in more dire need of worldwide attention. Since you seem to feel so strongly about this, are you ticked that your current administration is ignoring the horrors of Sudan?

Pray tell, what exactly is YOUR administration doing about the horrors in the Sudan?
 
Yeah so Syria = sunnis , and Iran = Shia. Thats both sides of Islam, plus the 9/11 boys came from Saudi Arabia. Not really making friends out there are we? Or is that irrelevant?

There is a quote I heard which goes well with what you said. I think it goes: "It's me against my brother. Its my brother and I against our cousin. Its my brother, my cousin, and I against our neighbor. etc"

They might be different sides, but when a common 'enemy' is involved, they are all just Muslim. Just like if aliens came down and tried to take over the world, I think that EVERY person will be able to put aside their differences and try to defend our home.
 
Fair enough. But theyre not in our world. We're in theirs.
 
Nah, two different worlds. We landed there in the 20th century.
 
Nah, two different worlds. We landed there in the 20th century.

The Israelis have been in that area since the old testiment. Perhaps you should read a bible. :shock:
 
Yes and still the US has been up to its neck in it since the 50s. I wonder, why would they want to give themselves such trouble? Is it the clear blue skies? The beautiful sand dunes, the atmospheric music and the sense of the exotic? Perhaps its the love of those amazing creatures called Camels, the ships of the desert. No? then whatever could it be?



... :2rofll:

Good one! :lamo
 
My administration? I didn't even vote for Bush.

You do realize it is possible to disagree with the Bush administration and not support the Mullahs, don't you? You probably haven't figured that out by the looks of it.

And yes, I wish more were being done about the horrors in Sudan. Thanks for asking.


I don't disagree with you. And yes, I wish my government would do more too. Fact is, it's embarrassing that this is happening to the world's ignorance.

The main point I was trying to make is to put forth other world problems to those who consistantly throw the Iraqi humanitarian card. It was never humanitarian mission, nor will it ever be.
 
The Israelis have been in that area since the old testiment. Perhaps you should read a bible. :shock:


You're right, I apologise.

I should have remembered that we must always be mindful of the Israelis in any of our discussions since their interests are our interests and we=Israel.

Israel, I hereby apologise unreservedly for leaving you out of my thoughts for a few moments. It wont happen again.:2bigcry:
 
Back
Top Bottom