• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Brad Parscale hospitalized after he was armed and threatening to harm himself

Maybe, but Mueller was also an old man within millimeters of retirement when this was tossed in his lap.

Marvelous. The fate of our nation was put in the hands of a guy muttering, "I'm gettin' too old for this shit."
 
Marvelous. The fate of our nation was put in the hands of a guy muttering, "I'm gettin' too old for this shit."

Well, I mean really. The guy is 75 years old and couldn’t answer questions about what was in his own report. Nobody wants to spend their twilight years getting roped out of retirement to deal with that crap and be yelled at by Congress for it.
 
Well, I mean really. The guy is 75 years old and couldn’t answer questions about what was in his own report. Nobody wants to spend their twilight years getting roped out of retirement to deal with that crap and be yelled at by Congress for it.

That's fine. It's not like 210,000 people died as a result or anything.
 
I reject the notion that his institutionalism prevented him from arriving at a conclusion of obstruction of justice or conspiracy. He allowed himself to be bullied by the Trump Administration, pure and simple.
That has become clear with the revelation that the Mueller team spent every day on the job believing they could be fired at any minute. They did not investigate Trump's finances or subpoena Trump to testify because it was a "red line" for the Whitehouse. I wonder how many other red lines Mueller did not cross?
 
amusing that your claim IS Goebbelsian. I provided you links disproving this Goebbelsian claim.

Your link to George Watson, whose views on socialisms are based on mistranslation and distorted by his political and ideological biases are proof of absolutely nothing. Hitler only came to power thanks to the backing of right wing conservatives. In February of 1933 Hitler and Goering met with a large group of German industrialists and declared to them that business and democracy were incompatible and that the workers needed to be dragged away from socialism. They promised bold actions that would protect their businesses and property from communism. Those German industrialists then contributed more than two million Reichsmarks to the Nazi election fund. When Hitler became Chancellor in 1933 he made good on those promises to the industrialists and his voters to destroy socialism in Germany. Much of 1933 was spent persecuting socialists and communists. Liquidating their parties, imprisoning and in numerous cases murdering their leadership and rank and file members.

Watson would have you believe that a Nazi government brought to power by conservatives and subjected communists, socialists, trade unionists, and liberals to internment or execution, was done in order to create a socialist state. The contradictions in that are just too great to be even remotely credible.
 
Your link to George Watson, whose views on socialisms are based on mistranslation and distorted by his political and ideological biases are proof of absolutely nothing. Hitler only came to power thanks to the backing of right wing conservatives. In February of 1933 Hitler and Goering met with a large group of German industrialists and declared to them that business and democracy were incompatible and that the workers needed to be dragged away from socialism. They promised bold actions that would protect their businesses and property from communism. Those German industrialists then contributed more than two million Reichsmarks to the Nazi election fund. When Hitler became Chancellor in 1933 he made good on those promises to the industrialists and his voters to destroy socialism in Germany. Much of 1933 was spent persecuting socialists and communists. Liquidating their parties, imprisoning and in numerous cases murdering their leadership and rank and file members.

Watson would have you believe that a Nazi government brought to power by conservatives and subjected communists, socialists, trade unionists, and liberals to internment or execution, was done in order to create a socialist state. The contradictions in that are just too great to be even remotely credible.
Not to mention all the German corporations that got rich from the slave labor Hitler supplied them.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...sche-Bank-VW-VERY-rich-using-slave-labor.html
 
Actually, my opinion is bit more than the thoughts of "guy at the end of the bar." My opinion is based on the excerpts from Weissman's book. It's a picture of Mueller constantly deferring to the image of the White House and not wanting to stir up a hornet's nest. He got bullied.
Of course (to the bolded).

Not familiar with the book, nor author.
 
All he did was IT work and data processing for the Trump campaign. Of course the MSM of the super rich would lie trying to protray him as Trump's top campaign manager.

He literally was the top campaign manager, did you think nobody would realize this was propaganda bulshit?

As for Parscale’s arrest, he was beating his wife and threatening to kill her. The “suicidal” stuff Is cover.
 
That is disputed. What isn't is that Goebbels was a socialist who hated capitalists. Please read something other than what is spoon fed to you by MSM.
Nazi Germany wasn’t socialist, it’s just what they called themselves.
Want proof?
 
Nazi Germany wasn’t socialist, it’s just what they called themselves.
Want proof?
This isn't a Biden debate where you change the subject. I am talking about Joseph Goebbels. But,since you asked, here's a link:


It is now clear beyond all reasonable doubt that Hitler and his associates believed they were socialists, and that others, including democratic socialists, thought so too. The title of National Socialism was not hypocritical. Many recent analysts have fastidiously refused to study the mind of Hitler; and they accept, as unquestioningly as many Nazis did in the 1930s, the slogan "Crusade against Marxism" as a summary of his views. "I have learned a great deal from Marxism" he once remarked, "as I do not hesitate to admit". He was proud of a knowledge of Marxist texts acquired in his student days before the First World War. "I have put into practice what these peddlers and pen pushers have timidly begun", adding revealingly that "the whole of National Socialism" was based on Marx. Hitler's discovery was that socialism could be national as well as international. There could be a national socialism. That is how he reportedly talked to his fellow Nazi Otto Wagener in the early 1930s. The socialism of the future would lie in "the community of the volk", not in internationalism, he claimed, and his task was to "convert the German volk to socialism without simply killing off the old individualists", meaning the entrepreneurial and managerial classes left from the age of liberalism. They should be used, not destroyed. The state could control, after all, without owning, guided by a single party, the economy could be planned and directed without dispossessing the propertied classes.
 
Back
Top Bottom