• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

BP Engineer Called Doomed Rig a 'Nightmare Well'

ADK_Forever

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 6, 2008
Messages
3,706
Reaction score
1,001
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
BP took measures to cut costs in the weeks before the catastrophic blowout in the Gulf of Mexico as it dealt with one problem after another, prompting a BP engineer to describe the doomed rig as a "nightmare well," according to internal documents released Monday.

The comment by BP engineer Brian Morel came in an e-mail April 14, six days before the Deepwater Horizon rig explosion that killed 11 people and has sent tens of millions of gallons of oil into the Gulf in the nation's worst environmental disaster.
The e-mail was among dozens of internal documents released by the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which is investigating the explosion and its aftermath.
In a letter to BP CEO Tony Hayward, Reps. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., and Bart Stupak, D-Mich., noted at least five questionable decisions BP made in the days leading up to the explosion.

"The common feature of these five decisions is that they posed a trade-off between cost and well safety," said Waxman and Stupak. Waxman chairs the energy panel while Stupak heads a subcommittee on oversight and investigations.

"Time after time, it appears that BP made decisions that increased the risk of a blowout to save the company time or expense," the lawmakers wrote in the 14-page letter to Hayward. "If this is what happened, BP's carelessness and complacency have inflicted a heavy toll on the Gulf, its inhabitants, and the workers on the rig."
The letter by Waxman and Stupak focuses on details such as the design of the well, saying that the company apparently chose a riskier option among two possibilities to provide a barrier to the flow of gas in space surrounding steel tubes in the well.
Despite warnings from its own engineers, "BP chose the more risky casing option, apparently because the liner option would have cost $7 to $10 million more and taken longer," Waxman and Stupak said.

In the brief e-mail, Morel said the company is likely to make last-minute changes in the well. "We could be running it in 2-3 days, so need a relative quick response. Sorry for the late notice, this has been nightmare well which has everyone all over the place," Morel wrote.

BP apparently rejected advice of a subcontractor, Halliburton Inc., in preparing for a cementing job to close up the well. BP rejected Halliburton's recommendation to use 21 "centralizers" to make sure the casing ran down the center of the well bore. Instead, BP used six centralizers.

In an e-mail on April 16, a BP official involved in the decision explained: "It will take 10 hours to install them. I do not like this." Later that day, another official recognized the risks of proceeding with insufficient centralizers but commented: "who cares, it's done, end of story, will probably be fine."
FOXNews.com - BP Engineer Called Doomed Rig a 'Nightmare Well'

BP should just start signing blank checks.
 

apdst

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 23, 2009
Messages
131,540
Reaction score
30,457
Location
Bagdad, La.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative

ADK_Forever

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 6, 2008
Messages
3,706
Reaction score
1,001
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
And, more interpertation of reality. Accuracy doesn't matter, only the mythology.

Incredible that a couple innocuous emails define what exactly went wrong on the rig.

At least this OP proves that Halliburton may not have been at fault...:rofl



Well, hell, I'm sold, if Waxman and Stupack said it...:rofl
Well, it's not like they said something really stupid like, "They cemented the entire well.". :2wave:
 

tacomancer

Big Scary Liberal
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
39,762
Reaction score
20,589
Location
Akron
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
And, more interpertation of reality. Accuracy doesn't matter, only the mythology.

Incredible that a couple innocuous emails define what exactly went wrong on the rig.

At least this OP proves that Halliburton may not have been at fault...:rofl



Well, hell, I'm sold, if Waxman and Stupack said it...:rofl
Yeah, its not like an engineer has any technical expertise or insight into what might have gone wrong! :lol:

Seriously adpst, this is your argument?
 

danarhea

Slayer of the DP Newsbot
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
43,603
Reaction score
26,254
Location
Houston, TX
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Documents Show Risky Decisions Before BP Blowout

Internal BP documents, including an e-mail message calling the well drilled by the Deepwater Horizon a “nightmare,” show a pattern of risky choices made to save time and money in the weeks before the disastrous April 20 blowout, according to a letter sent to the oil company by the leaders of a House committee on Monday.

The leaders of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce cited five areas in which the company had made decisions that “increased the danger of a catastrophic well,” including the choice for the design of the well, preparations for and tests of the cement job and assurances that the well was properly sealed on the top.

Taken together, the documents offer the strongest case yet that BP bears much of the responsibility for the catastrophic explosion that killed 11 workers and the still-unchecked leaking of millions of gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico.
To those who continue to defend BP's reckless actions, you no longer have a leg to stand on. The evidence is in, in black and white, from BP's own internal documents. So yes, BP has a lot to account for, and bears responsibility for this catastrophe. But the responsibility does not end with BP. In a highly publicized press conference, Obama had given the green light to offshore drilling. I have no problem with that. My problem is that Obama bears responsibility for giving the green light without restoring some of the regulation that had been previously gutted. Obama bears responsibility for the oil company shills that ran MMS. And, finally, Obama bears responsibility for not taking charge, but by putting those who created the mess in charge of dealing with the aftermath of the spill, just like the fox in the henhouse.

Yea, I know, I know. Some of you are going to say that it was Bush who gutted the regulations, and installed oil company shills in MMS. For those who do, I've got news for you. Bush has not been in office in almost a year and a half. For the last year and a half, Obama has had every opportunity to set things right. Instead of doing that, he staged a photo-op, in which he gave the green light to offshore drilling, while not giving a damn about the consequences of not regulating it. This will be Obama's legacy - A big fat middle finger, jabbed in the face of the American people, while attempting to score political points for his own image.

Meanwhile, the oil still gushes into the Gulf. Thank you, BP.

Article is here.
 
Last edited:

ADK_Forever

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 6, 2008
Messages
3,706
Reaction score
1,001
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Re: Documents Show Risky Decisions Before BP Blowout

To those who continue to defend BP's reckless actions, you no longer have a leg to stand on. The evidence is in, in black and white, from BP's own internal documents. So yes, BP has a lot to account for, and bears responsibility for this catastrophe. But the responsibility does not end with BP. In a highly publicized press conference, Obama had given the green light to offshore drilling. I have no problem with that. My problem is that Obama bears responsibility for giving the green light without restoring some of the regulation that had been previously gutted. Obama bears responsibility for the oil company shills that ran MMS. And, finally, Obama bears responsibility for not taking charge, but by putting those who created the mess in charge of dealing with the aftermath of the spill, just like the fox in the henhouse.

Yea, I know, I know. Some of you are going to say that it was Bush who gutted the regulations, and installed oil company shills in MMS. For those who do, I've got news for you. Bush has not been in office in almost a year and a half. For the last year and a half, Obama has had every opportunity to set things right. Instead of doing that, he staged a photo-op, in which he gave the green light to offshore drilling, while not giving a damn about the consequences of not regulating it. This will be Obama's legacy - A big fat middle finger, jabbed in the face of the American people, while attempting to score political points for his own image.

Meanwhile, the oil still gushes into the Gulf. Thank you, BP.

Article is here.
Yes but, Bush's evil ghost still haunts us. This has his and Cheeney's fingerprints all over it.

However I do, and have, agree that Obama should have done much more to restructure MMS. To that end, I can't understand why the hell a Bush oil man, Salazar, is in there. It's like having Barracuda Barbie charged with teaching public speaking to our children. :doh
 

Deuce

Outer space potato man
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 6, 2010
Messages
74,107
Reaction score
32,323
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Re: Documents Show Risky Decisions Before BP Blowout

Hey, if a couple out of context emails between a handful of scientists on one project can become PROOF THAT THE ENTIRE GLOBAL WARMING THEORY IS A HOAX then clearly BP deliberately wanted to blow up the well ;)
 

apdst

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 23, 2009
Messages
131,540
Reaction score
30,457
Location
Bagdad, La.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
Yeah, its not like an engineer has any technical expertise or insight into what might have gone wrong! :lol:

Seriously adpst, this is your argument?
So, what did said engineer say?
 

apdst

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 23, 2009
Messages
131,540
Reaction score
30,457
Location
Bagdad, La.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
Re: Documents Show Risky Decisions Before BP Blowout

Yes but, Bush's evil ghost still haunts us. This has his and Cheeney's fingerprints all over it.

However I do, and have, agree that Obama should have done much more to restructure MMS. To that end, I can't understand why the hell a Bush oil man, Salazar, is in there. It's like having Barracuda Barbie charged with teaching public speaking to our children. :doh
"It's Bush's fault!"...I'm gonna be sick.

Let us not forget that the director of the MMS, that was calling the shots prior to the blowout was an Obama girl.
 

apdst

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 23, 2009
Messages
131,540
Reaction score
30,457
Location
Bagdad, La.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
Re: Documents Show Risky Decisions Before BP Blowout

To those who continue to defend BP's reckless actions, you no longer have a leg to stand on. The evidence is in, in black and white, from BP's own internal documents. So yes, BP has a lot to account for, and bears responsibility for this catastrophe. But the responsibility does not end with BP. In a highly publicized press conference, Obama had given the green light to offshore drilling. I have no problem with that. My problem is that Obama bears responsibility for giving the green light without restoring some of the regulation that had been previously gutted. Obama bears responsibility for the oil company shills that ran MMS. And, finally, Obama bears responsibility for not taking charge, but by putting those who created the mess in charge of dealing with the aftermath of the spill, just like the fox in the henhouse.

Yea, I know, I know. Some of you are going to say that it was Bush who gutted the regulations, and installed oil company shills in MMS. For those who do, I've got news for you. Bush has not been in office in almost a year and a half. For the last year and a half, Obama has had every opportunity to set things right. Instead of doing that, he staged a photo-op, in which he gave the green light to offshore drilling, while not giving a damn about the consequences of not regulating it. This will be Obama's legacy - A big fat middle finger, jabbed in the face of the American people, while attempting to score political points for his own image.

Meanwhile, the oil still gushes into the Gulf. Thank you, BP.

Article is here.
Whose been defending BP? Speaking for myself, I'm only interested in the facts.

So far, the "facts" haven't matched up to what happened. Nevermind that I'm one of only about three people on this forum that even know what a centralizer is.
 

Frozengale

Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2010
Messages
161
Reaction score
56
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
Re: Documents Show Risky Decisions Before BP Blowout

I've been going out on the idea that this whole thing was just an unavoidable tragedy. But if the Engineer E-mails are real then now I'm pissed at BP. The question is how do we go after those responsible without actually taking the company out and costing thousands and thousands of people their jobs. It's a delicate situation as it is and I fear the the US/Obama is going to do something rash and stupid.
 

American

Constitutionalist
Bartender
Supporting Member
Monthly Subscriber
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
88,574
Reaction score
27,832
Location
SE Virginia
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Re: Documents Show Risky Decisions Before BP Blowout

To those who continue to defend BP's reckless actions, you no longer have a leg to stand on. The evidence is in, in black and white, from BP's own internal documents. So yes, BP has a lot to account for, and bears responsibility for this catastrophe. But the responsibility does not end with BP. In a highly publicized press conference, Obama had given the green light to offshore drilling. I have no problem with that. My problem is that Obama bears responsibility for giving the green light without restoring some of the regulation that had been previously gutted. Obama bears responsibility for the oil company shills that ran MMS. And, finally, Obama bears responsibility for not taking charge, but by putting those who created the mess in charge of dealing with the aftermath of the spill, just like the fox in the henhouse.

Yea, I know, I know. Some of you are going to say that it was Bush who gutted the regulations, and installed oil company shills in MMS. For those who do, I've got news for you. Bush has not been in office in almost a year and a half. For the last year and a half, Obama has had every opportunity to set things right. Instead of doing that, he staged a photo-op, in which he gave the green light to offshore drilling, while not giving a damn about the consequences of not regulating it. This will be Obama's legacy - A big fat middle finger, jabbed in the face of the American people, while attempting to score political points for his own image.

Meanwhile, the oil still gushes into the Gulf. Thank you, BP.

Article is here.
Maybe we could try sealing up the leak with your buttplug. :lamo Course that would cause another leak.
 

ADK_Forever

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 6, 2008
Messages
3,706
Reaction score
1,001
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Re: Documents Show Risky Decisions Before BP Blowout

I'm only interested in the facts.

So far, the "facts" haven't matched up to what happened. Nevermind that I'm one of only about three people on this forum that even know what a centralizer is.

And yet, you still don't have a clue what they did. Tell us again how they cemented "the entire well".
:lol:

"It's Bush's fault!"...I'm gonna be sick.

I'll get the puke bucket fer ya. You're gonna need it.
:mrgreen:
 

ReverendHellh0und

I don't respect you.
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 13, 2007
Messages
79,901
Reaction score
20,981
Location
I love your hate.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
Re: Documents Show Risky Decisions Before BP Blowout

To those who continue to defend BP's reckless actions, you no longer have a leg to stand on. The evidence is in, in black and white, from BP's own internal documents. So yes, BP has a lot to account for, and bears responsibility for this catastrophe. But the responsibility does not end with BP. In a highly publicized press conference, Obama had given the green light to offshore drilling. I have no problem with that. My problem is that Obama bears responsibility for giving the green light without restoring some of the regulation that had been previously gutted. Obama bears responsibility for the oil company shills that ran MMS. And, finally, Obama bears responsibility for not taking charge, but by putting those who created the mess in charge of dealing with the aftermath of the spill, just like the fox in the henhouse.

Yea, I know, I know. Some of you are going to say that it was Bush who gutted the regulations, and installed oil company shills in MMS. For those who do, I've got news for you. Bush has not been in office in almost a year and a half. For the last year and a half, Obama has had every opportunity to set things right. Instead of doing that, he staged a photo-op, in which he gave the green light to offshore drilling, while not giving a damn about the consequences of not regulating it. This will be Obama's legacy - A big fat middle finger, jabbed in the face of the American people, while attempting to score political points for his own image.

Meanwhile, the oil still gushes into the Gulf. Thank you, BP.

Article is here.




And it's a gift that keeps on giving, as 13 countries offer help, Obama chooses to not waive the jones act as we get a new valdez every 8 days. It's criminal.
 

ReverendHellh0und

I don't respect you.
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 13, 2007
Messages
79,901
Reaction score
20,981
Location
I love your hate.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
Re: Documents Show Risky Decisions Before BP Blowout

Yes but, Bush's evil ghost still haunts us. This has his and Cheeney's fingerprints all over it.

However I do, and have, agree that Obama should have done much more to restructure MMS. To that end, I can't understand why the hell a Bush oil man, Salazar, is in there. It's like having Barracuda Barbie charged with teaching public speaking to our children. :doh



wow light critisizm of obama, I would be impressed however knowing your penchant for vulgarity, it's painfully clear this is simple lip service. The MMS is but one small part of this, it is however far more that obama still fiddles by not waiving the jones act and trying to bankrupt BP while the gulf is destroyed.
 

apdst

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 23, 2009
Messages
131,540
Reaction score
30,457
Location
Bagdad, La.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
Re: Documents Show Risky Decisions Before BP Blowout


And yet, you still don't have a clue what they did. Tell us again how they cemented "the entire well".
:lol:


I'll get the puke bucket fer ya. You're gonna need it.
:mrgreen:
I gotta better idea. How 'bout you explain how they inserted three cement plugs inside the production string? Hmmm?

How do you know I'm wrong? From your extensive experience in the oilfield? I'm a third generation oilfield hand. What the hell could I possibly know? Right? If you worked on a rig, you would still be looking for the keys to the v-door. :rofl

Care to tell us what the centralizers had to do with it?

This is a centralizer. Since, I doubt you know.


 

Goshin

The Hammer of Chaos
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 16, 2009
Messages
45,490
Reaction score
50,037
Location
Dixie
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Re: Documents Show Risky Decisions Before BP Blowout

Has anyone mentioned that they might not be doing this deep-water drilling at all, if they were allowed to drill closer to shore in most places? Or in ANWR? oopps...... :mrgreen:
 

tacomancer

Big Scary Liberal
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
39,762
Reaction score
20,589
Location
Akron
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
Re: Documents Show Risky Decisions Before BP Blowout

Has anyone mentioned that they might not be doing this deep-water drilling at all, if they were allowed to drill closer to shore in most places? Or in ANWR? oopps...... :mrgreen:
Well first of all, I don't think you are going to be able to get much gulf oil in anwr :2razz:
Also, it might have been better, and probably would have, but it was what it was and the oil companies should have known the risks of drilling where they did and acted accordingly, including a choice to not drill if there were too many potential problems.
 

apdst

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 23, 2009
Messages
131,540
Reaction score
30,457
Location
Bagdad, La.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
Re: Documents Show Risky Decisions Before BP Blowout

Well first of all, I don't think you are going to be able to get much gulf oil in anwr :2razz:
Also, it might have been better, and probably would have, but it was what it was and the oil companies should have known the risks of drilling where they did and acted accordingly, including a choice to not drill if there were too many potential problems.
There have been 40,000 wells drilled in the GOM. What potential problems? **** will happen, no matter what.
 

tacomancer

Big Scary Liberal
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
39,762
Reaction score
20,589
Location
Akron
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
Re: Documents Show Risky Decisions Before BP Blowout

There have been 40,000 wells drilled in the GOM. What potential problems? **** will happen, no matter what.
A potential massive spill that covers much of the gulf perhaps.
 

apdst

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 23, 2009
Messages
131,540
Reaction score
30,457
Location
Bagdad, La.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
Re: Documents Show Risky Decisions Before BP Blowout

A potential massive spill that covers much of the gulf perhaps.
It covers some of the GOM. Not, "much", not even, "most".

The GOM is 615,000 square miles. How many square miles does Obama's slick cover?

But hey, the good news is, the Coast Gaurd just approved ten more vac barges. That brings the total to a whopping, 13! Nearly two months after the blowout. Just imagine how insignificant this slick would have been, had Obama removed his thumb from his ass and did his job. That wouldn't have helped his agenda, though. huh?
 

tacomancer

Big Scary Liberal
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
39,762
Reaction score
20,589
Location
Akron
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
Re: Documents Show Risky Decisions Before BP Blowout

It covers some of the GOM. Not, "much", not even, "most".
It is coming ashore in multiple states. The term much is fine.

The GOM is 615,000 square miles. How many square miles does Obama's slick cover?
Enough to be a disaster.

But hey, the good news is, the Coast Gaurd just approved ten more vac barges. That brings the total to a whopping, 13! Nearly two months after the blowout. Just imagine how insignificant this slick would have been, had Obama removed his thumb from his ass and did his job. That wouldn't have helped his agenda, though. huh?
This has nothing to do with the role of regulation or any mistakes BP may have made and is pretty much a paranoid rant.

Aren't you complaining about people not staying on subject in another thread tonight?
True dat. I believe there's a rule that governs staying on topic, too. .
 
Last edited:

goldcatt

Member
Joined
May 14, 2010
Messages
58
Reaction score
16
Location
Pennsylvania
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
Re: Documents Show Risky Decisions Before BP Blowout

It covers some of the GOM. Not, "much", not even, "most".

The GOM is 615,000 square miles. How many square miles does Obama's slick cover?

But hey, the good news is, the Coast Gaurd just approved ten more vac barges. That brings the total to a whopping, 13! Nearly two months after the blowout. Just imagine how insignificant this slick would have been, had Obama removed his thumb from his ass and did his job. That wouldn't have helped his agenda, though. huh?
Obama's slick?

Uh-huh.

Tell me, Mr. "Very Conservative", why would the profits from that rig have belonged to BP, but somehow the losses belong to the government?
 

apdst

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 23, 2009
Messages
131,540
Reaction score
30,457
Location
Bagdad, La.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
Re: Documents Show Risky Decisions Before BP Blowout

It is coming ashore in multiple states. The term much is fine.



Enough to be a disaster.



This has nothing to do with the role of regulation or any mistakes BP may have made and is pretty much a paranoid rant.

Aren't you complaining about people not staying on subject in another thread tonight?
I'm only responding to your posts, sir. Not complaining about the lack of intelligent content of your posts.
 
Top Bottom