• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bodycam footage of the attack on Paul Pelosi

If he is served a summons he will be on the spot. And I stand by position he will.

Now you know victims do testify or face the failure to do so when summoned.

The video of this idiot smashing windows to gain entry and then him attacking Pelosi on police bodycams isn’t enough for you? The bubble you live in is incredible
 
The defense will want PP to testify. You will come to find this so.
The defense will advise their client to plead guilty to the offense he committed on video.

Or they will plead insanity.

But that's now normal, rational people think.
 
The defense will advise their client to plead guilty to the offense he committed on video.

Or they will plead insanity.

But that's now normal, rational people think.
He’s already plead not guilty.
 
Video helps but it doesn't answer all questions. And obviously there is some editing done to the video.
The video does not tell us if Paul knew this guy or not. It does show the guy breaking in, but did he knock first and Paul didn't let him in and so he broke in? There is a clinch in the video. How do we know he didn't call out or knock first? We don't. This is why complete transparency is always important. In all likelihood the video clears up some things but in itself doesn't say he did or didn't know his attacker.
So we'll just put you down in favor of "beating an old man with a hammer."

Spare me your weak-ass excuses. You'd be happier if Paul Pelosi had died.
 
Oh, yeah that makes perfect sense. To a democrat.
But seriosly, Paul has a glass of something in his left hand, while his other hand is on the hammer with the assailant. It's strange.
And how does that mitigate the guy hitting an old man with a hammer?

Let's hear it.
 
The video of this idiot smashing windows to gain entry and then him attacking Pelosi on police bodycams isn’t enough for you? The bubble you live in is incredible

It's an appalling reflection on society that the authorities felt it necessary to release this footage to dispel the Faux disinformation.
 
I would like them to explain why it took them months to release the video and only after a judge ordered it. They played this same nonsense with his DWI.
 
The video of this idiot smashing windows to gain entry and then him attacking Pelosi on police bodycams isn’t enough for you? The bubble you live in is incredible
fox news is genius
 
It's an appalling reflection on society that the authorities felt it necessary to release this footage to dispel the Faux disinformation.
Do you also feel that way about the video footage of the police in Tenn too? Should that have been kept private as well?
 
Do you also feel that way about the video footage of the police in Tenn too? Should that have been kept private as well?

I think the victim of a crime or their family should be the ones who decide if footage gets released, not Tucker or Sean.

In the Pelosi case, it really is none of our business.
 
It should not be a surprise to anyone that people will fill in the blanks for themselves when things are hidden from them.

Especially when they are constantly being told by their favorite media outlets that "the truth" is being withheld from them.

Of course, the truth never matters to a conspiracy theorist or their purveyors, because they are already on to the next by the time they are proven to be full of it.
 
I would like them to explain why it took them months to release the video and only after a judge ordered it. They played this same nonsense with his DWI.

Yea it is a giant conspiracy.
 
Victims testify all the time. You know that right?
Alright. You are the defense attorney and you have Paul Pelosi on the stand. What would YOU ask him?
 
So what?

Just because Trumpist scum made up a bunch of bullshit about Paul Pelosi in a bid to troll the left doesn't mean anything needs to be "answered" in regard to their bullshit. Claiming to "have questions" doesn't mean anything, yet for some reason one group of people seem absolutely convinced that all they have to do to create a debate is to "ask questions".

That's not how investigation works. You follow the facts where they lead. You do not arbitrarily draw up a list of questions and treat their underlying assumptions as true unless they are proven false.
Wait, "Trumpist scum" that was what was initially reported as the perpetrator and Nancy the intended victim? Biden said as much just before the mid terms. Blamed MAGA.
 
Back
Top Bottom