• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bodycam footage of the attack on Paul Pelosi

Video helps but it doesn't answer all questions. And obviously there is some editing done to the video.
The video does not tell us if Paul knew this guy or not. It does show the guy breaking in, but did he knock first and Paul didn't let him in and so he broke in? There is a clinch in the video. How do we know he didn't call out or knock first? We don't. This is why complete transparency is always important. In all likelihood the video clears up some things but in itself doesn't say he did or didn't know his attacker.
 
Looking again at the video, Does Paul have a glass of something in his left hand?
 
Integrityrespec said:
Video helps but it doesn't answer all questions. And obviously there is some editing done to the video.
The video does not tell us if Paul knew this guy or not. It does show the guy breaking in, but did he knock first and Paul didn't let him in and so he broke in? There is a clinch in the video. How do we know he didn't call out or knock first? We don't. This is why complete transparency is always important. In all likelihood the video clears up some things but in itself doesn't say he did or didn't know his attacker.
Click to expand...
It was actually McCarthy that knew Depape. He hired him to do a hit on Nancy Pelosi so he could steal the Chair.
 
daeler said:
It was actually McCarthy that knew Depape. He hired him to do a hit on Nancy Pelosi so he could steal the Chair.
Click to expand...
Oh, yeah that makes perfect sense. To a democrat.
But seriosly, Paul has a glass of something in his left hand, while his other hand is on the hammer with the assailant. It's strange.
 
Integrityrespec said:
Oh, yeah that makes perfect sense. To a democrat.
Click to expand...
makes as much sense as all the other conspiracies.
Integrityrespec said:
But seriosly, Paul has a glass of something in his left hand, while his other hand is on the hammer with the assailant. It's strange.
Click to expand...
He had a glass of water, after calling the cops he tried as well as he could to stall, didn't you read any of the earlier stuff? they mentioned the stalling tactic. Personally I would rather know how the security failed so badly that Pelosi was almost killed by some random hate filled guy, makes you wonder if a certain politician paid off the security firm to gain more power in congress.
 
Integrityrespec said:
Video helps but it doesn't answer all questions. And obviously there is some editing done to the video.
The video does not tell us if Paul knew this guy or not. It does show the guy breaking in, but did he knock first and Paul didn't let him in and so he broke in? There is a clinch in the video. How do we know he didn't call out or knock first? We don't. This is why complete transparency is always important. In all likelihood the video clears up some things but in itself doesn't say he did or didn't know his attacker.
Click to expand...

So what?

Just because Trumpist scum made up a bunch of bullshit about Paul Pelosi in a bid to troll the left doesn't mean anything needs to be "answered" in regard to their bullshit. Claiming to "have questions" doesn't mean anything, yet for some reason one group of people seem absolutely convinced that all they have to do to create a debate is to "ask questions".

That's not how investigation works. You follow the facts where they lead. You do not arbitrarily draw up a list of questions and treat their underlying assumptions as true unless they are proven false.
 
"You know that ain't their style.
1. Make outrageous statement
2. Never retract outrageous statement even in the face of overwhelming evidence
3. Leave their viewers to have a "well you never know" attitude about everything and anything that can be categorically proven
4. Repeat"
 
daeler said:
Personally I would rather know how the security failed so badly that Pelosi was almost killed by some random hate filled guy,
Click to expand...
It seems appalling, but apparently the security policy was only to protect the Speaker, who was not there. I have to wonder if we're going to see an expansion of security for federal officials and their families. How we usually seem to do it is, we're lax on it, then one or more tragedies happen, then we react.
 
Integrityrespec said:
Video helps but it doesn't answer all questions. And obviously there is some editing done to the video.
The video does not tell us if Paul knew this guy or not. It does show the guy breaking in, but did he knock first and Paul didn't let him in and so he broke in? There is a clinch in the video. How do we know he didn't call out or knock first? We don't. This is why complete transparency is always important. In all likelihood the video clears up some things but in itself doesn't say he did or didn't know his attacker.
Click to expand...
This is so low class and embarrassing. These contrived, horseshit questions... you should be embarrassed of yourself.
 
Integrityrespec said:
Video helps but it doesn't answer all questions. And obviously there is some editing done to the video.
The video does not tell us if Paul knew this guy or not. It does show the guy breaking in, but did he knock first and Paul didn't let him in and so he broke in? There is a clinch in the video. How do we know he didn't call out or knock first? We don't. This is why complete transparency is always important. In all likelihood the video clears up some things but in itself doesn't say he did or didn't know his attacker.
Click to expand...
Jeez, man. What is wrong with you?
 
daeler said:
It was actually McCarthy that knew Depape. He hired him to do a hit on Nancy Pelosi so he could steal the Chair.
Click to expand...
Yeah, everyone's been saying that.
 
Integrityrespec said:
Video helps but it doesn't answer all questions. And obviously there is some editing done to the video.
The video does not tell us if Paul knew this guy or not. It does show the guy breaking in, but did he knock first and Paul didn't let him in and so he broke in? There is a clinch in the video. How do we know he didn't call out or knock first? We don't. This is why complete transparency is always important. In all likelihood the video clears up some things but in itself doesn't say he did or didn't know his attacker.
Click to expand...

Why do you and the other Pelosi hater matter to law enforcement as they charged the individual? Police charged the male, but you want more?
 
daeler said:
It was actually McCarthy that knew Depape. He hired him to do a hit on Nancy Pelosi so he could steal the Chair.
Click to expand...
I don't think he was suppose to hit Paul that hard.
 
Integrityrespec said:
Oh, yeah that makes perfect sense. To a democrat.
But seriosly, Paul has a glass of something in his left hand, while his other hand is on the hammer with the assailant. It's strange.
Click to expand...
While opening the door. Hmmm
 
Integrityrespec said:
Oh, yeah that makes perfect sense. To a democrat.
But seriosly, Paul has a glass of something in his left hand, while his other hand is on the hammer with the assailant. It's strange.
Click to expand...
How should have Paul Pelosi have acted to satisfy you?
 
VySky said:
Like most people would have acted under that circumstance.
Click to expand...
I doubt most people could have handled it as well as that old guy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom