• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

'Blue Dog' Democrats Seek Larger Role (1 Viewer)

Navy Pride

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 11, 2005
Messages
39,883
Reaction score
3,070
Location
Pacific NW
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
Like I told you Liberals when it came to the elections last year..........Be careful what you wish for.........You might just get it.....;)


http://newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/11/15/171127.shtml?s=ic


'Blue Dog' Democrats Seek Larger Role

For a dozen years, the Democratic conservatives known as Blue Dogs have been baying at the moon, ignored by Republicans and tolerated by their more liberal Democratic colleagues. Now, these House lawmakers say that is about to change.

Republicans "did not lose their seats to liberal Democrats" in last weeks elections, said Rep. Mike Ross, D-Ark. "Republicans lost their seats to Blue Dog Democrats."

"We'll have a lot to say about what passes and what doesn't" when the 110th Congress convenes in January with Democrats in control for the first time in 12 years, said Ross, new communications director for the caucus.



With the addition of nine newly elected freshmen, the Blue Dogs claim 44 members, nearly 20 percent of the incoming Democratic majority. They will be led by Rep. Allen Boyd, D-Fla., and include Rep. Collin Peterson, D-Minn., in line to become the next Agriculture Committee chairman.
 
Navy Pride said:
Like I told you Liberals when it came to the elections last year..........Be careful what you wish for.........You might just get it.....;)


http://newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/11/15/171127.shtml?s=ic


'Blue Dog' Democrats Seek Larger Role

For a dozen years, the Democratic conservatives known as Blue Dogs have been baying at the moon, ignored by Republicans and tolerated by their more liberal Democratic colleagues. Now, these House lawmakers say that is about to change.

Republicans "did not lose their seats to liberal Democrats" in last weeks elections, said Rep. Mike Ross, D-Ark. "Republicans lost their seats to Blue Dog Democrats."

"We'll have a lot to say about what passes and what doesn't" when the 110th Congress convenes in January with Democrats in control for the first time in 12 years, said Ross, new communications director for the caucus.



With the addition of nine newly elected freshmen, the Blue Dogs claim 44 members, nearly 20 percent of the incoming Democratic majority. They will be led by Rep. Allen Boyd, D-Fla., and include Rep. Collin Peterson, D-Minn., in line to become the next Agriculture Committee chairman.

Well its about time they got a say-so in what happens. They are right they did not lose to the "Liberal Democrats" they lost to Moderate and Conservative Democrats. I can do only one this and that is :cheers:

By the way did you notice my Avatar?
 
ModerateDem said:
Well its about time they got a say-so in what happens. They are right they did not lose to the "Liberal Democrats" they lost to Moderate and Conservative Democrats. I can do only one this and that is :cheers:

By the way did you notice my Avatar?


Like Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid?:confused:

Yeah i did..........
 
Navy Pride said:
Like Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid?:confused:

Pelosi and Reid were already in office. The Republicans didn't lose anything to them.

Personally, I'm glad for this trend in the Democratic Party. We need more stable, temperate leadership in Washington, and that's something we haven't had for the entire time I've been following politics.

Hope the Republicans run a solid centrist in 2008. We might get something accomplished.
 
Korimyr the Rat said:
Pelosi and Reid were already in office. The Republicans didn't lose anything to them.

Personally, I'm glad for this trend in the Democratic Party. We need more stable, temperate leadership in Washington, and that's something we haven't had for the entire time I've been following politics.

Hope the Republicans run a solid centrist in 2008. We might get something accomplished.

Reid and Pelosi were not the majority leaders...they are now.........
 
Navy Pride said:
Reid and Pelosi were not the majority leaders...they are now.........

The large majority did not, do not know who these folks were/are, this was an election to split the power of government, and a new plan in Iraq, little more.
 
Navy Pride said:
Like Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid?:confused:

Yeah i did..........

Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi are about as Moderate or conservative as Ted Kennedy and John Kerry.

"The Blue Dogs were right the republicans did not lose to "Liberal Democrats" they lost to Blue Dog Moderate to Conservative Democrats."

I hope that clears what I said up for you.
 
Last edited:
ModerateDem said:
Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi are about as Moderate or conservative as Ted Kennedy and John Kerry.

"The Blue Dogs were right the republicans did not lose to "Liberal Democrats" they lost to Blue Dog Moderate to Conservative Democrats."

I hope that clears what I said up for you.

They are all four left wingers.........

I agree, the voting on the issues should be interesting.....Like I said when Reagan was president the Blue Dogs voted with him more then they did with their own party............
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom