- Joined
- Jun 25, 2013
- Messages
- 7,317
- Reaction score
- 2,926
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Valid explanation: We're experiencing a lull in the economy, jobs are going away, and I'm having trouble fulfilling expectations of employers.
Excuse: Rich people suck, they're the reason why I don't have a job!
and as DVS is trying to deny, there is a lot of blaming people for being born poor.
So that explains how you view what they have to say for themselves. What about what others say on their behalf? In other words, if I think that a large part of my kids bad attitude today is because his Dad was a dick to him, chances are that while I still expect him to behave himself, I will probably address that behavior in a different way then if he just woke up in a ****ty little mood. So if someone is raised in poverty, got a ****ty education, their parents gave up a long time ago and raised them believing there was no hope, their community is riddled with violence etc... If that someone behaves in a way I deem anti-social or destructive to others, I will probably give that person a little more room and approach them differently. Because I would first have to convince them that not only is there opportunity for a better life but that they are capable of achieving it and until they believe that their lives stay the same. Those to me are examples of conditions and legit reasons why someone ends up failing themselves, some call those excuses. I am not naive enough to believe that everyone one who fails does so for these reasons but I do believe there are many lives that get lost in hopelessness for these very reasons that would not be if they were convinced about other options and their ability to achieve them.
We still live in a "land of opportunity" where social mobilization is as high, if not higher, than anywhere else in the world. If someone wants something badly enough, odds are likely that they'll get it. Poor people will have a tougher time in primary school, but once college time comes around, they have so many tickets out.
Everybody runs the same race. Some people have better starting points, but all participants have a reachable finish line.
If you're a poor minority, scholarship money is practically THROWN at you. If you're a black female, all you have to do is schedule a civil service exam, put down your name, check the "African-American" and "female" boxes, and show up next Monday. If that's not enough, start kickin' around words like "Affirmative Action" to sweeten your pot.
On top of that, there is nothing keeping children (or adults, for that matter) from self-improving. Hell, in school I learned more from myself reading books and satiating my intellectual curiosity than I did from listing to some apple-polisher drone on in her own cute little way.
Even though I'm a white male, I was latchkey since 6 with a mother who had to keep a home and food on the table with alimony checks and factory job paychecks. Ask me if I got grants for college, I dare you...
This is why I'm posting as someone with an MBA instead of an excuse. I wanted better for myself, and by God I went out and got it.
No, we're not number 1 for social mobility. In fact, Canada, Spain, France, and I believe Australia have us beat. http://carnegie.org/fileadmin/Media/Publications/social_mobility_summit_2012_v4.pdf
Social mobility: the charts that shame Britain | News | theguardian.com I hate to break it to you, but we're not the shining city on the hill we used to be. The only thing we have left to feel superior about is our military. Big whoop, we're the best at blowing people up.
I figured it may not be the highest (since there are so many countries out there, many of which are not in an economically bad place right now), but I'd still contend with anyone who says that it's not high.
At least we're not the UK. :lol:
Eh, I believe it. From what I hear the UK isn't doing to hot economically lately.Well, I question the validity of that report when it mentioned France and Spain as "socially mobile" anyway.
UK has to be higher than both of those countries.
Eh, I believe it. From what I hear the UK isn't doing to hot economically lately.
They had nowhere to go but down. When much of Europe was sinking, they were managing to stay afloat pretty well.
Everything's cyclical, I guess.
Don't take my word for it. Read what the Guardian has to say about it.
Define "victim", please.
Blaming people for being born poor? Nope, what they did for themselves afterwards, sure. See, here's the deal. I was born into a "working poor" family. We were "working poor" most of my childhood. We never too food stamps and we never sat around waiting for the government to do something for us. I started working when I was 13. Since then I have bought my own clothes, shoes and I purchased my own vehicle and paid for the insurance starting at age 15.
I am where I am today, not rich by any means, because of choices I made. If your born poor and you want to play the "victim" the only thing you are a victim of is your own poor choices and your unwillingness not to take opportunities to better yourself.
If you never had to take food stamps then you were not poor the way the people I'm talking about are. If you weren't constantly worried about paying your rent, then you were not poor the way the poor of this country are today. If you bought a car at 15 and paid for the insurance, then you were not poor the way food stamp recipients are today. When you were 15, the wages you were making for whatever job you had could buy four times as much as they can now. I don't mean due to inflation. I mean that it would have taken four times as many hours of work to buy the same thing now that it did then. The era you grew up in is gone. The divide, not just between rich and poor, but everybody and poor, is much wider. Saying that this change is just due to "poor choices" is exactly blaming the victim.
If you never had to take food stamps then you were not poor the way the people I'm talking about are. If you weren't constantly worried about paying your rent, then you were not poor the way the poor of this country are today. If you bought a car at 15 and paid for the insurance, then you were not poor the way food stamp recipients are today. When you were 15, the wages you were making for whatever job you had could buy four times as much as they can now. I don't mean due to inflation. I mean that it would have taken four times as many hours of work to buy the same thing now that it did then. The era you grew up in is gone. The divide, not just between rich and poor, but everybody and poor, is much wider. Saying that this change is just due to "poor choices" is exactly blaming the victim.
Is blaming the victim a problem in our society?
A Big Mac here is 3 bucks now. Are you saying that it was 75 cents when I was 15? I promise you that you're wrong.
When I was young, a VHS VCR costs 2,000 dollars. Today I can get a Blu-ray player for 70. Yeah, that dollar sure has lost its stretch...
Why are you talking about inflation? I'm talking about the ratio of time spent working for wages and buying power. The cost of a Big Mac, as you decide to measure this in, is not important because of how much it cost when you were 15. It matters how many hours of work earning that money took.
Well, when I was 15 the minimum wage was 4.25. It's now 3 dollars higher.
If you're asking me if the price of a Big Mac, ceteris paribus, has gone up 75% since I was 15...the answer is "nuh uh".
Is blaming the victim a problem in our society?
Congratulations? Do you want a cookie? Do you really think that the price of Big Macs is a good indicator for the whole economy? What is the point of your complaint here? To show how little you understand about the issue at hand? You did that, so I guess a cookie is in order. Or maybe a Big Mac, I suppose.
Okay then, what's your bar? I'd love to know your measuring stick on "everything's 4x more expensive".
If one of us lacks comprehension, it's clearly you. Of course, as a socialist, you can't help but be ignorant to economics. If you weren't, you wouldn't be a socialist.
Is blaming the victim a problem in our society?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?