• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Blake Masters Wants to Fire All Generals and Replace Them With Conservatives

Mycroft said:
Yes. And now we have Generals who "are “woke” and “left-wing” losers who’ve never won a war".

That's why we need to fire the CinC.
Click to expand...
Michael Flynn would make an excellent Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

MAGA.
 
Mycroft said:
Yes. And now we have Generals who "are “woke” and “left-wing” losers who’ve never won a war".

That's why we need to fire the CinC.
Click to expand...
As we’ve seen, the strong masculine anti-woke militaries around the world are truly peak operational forces. Shining examples of professionalism and skill one and all.
 
jpn said:
Blake Masters, the Republican nominee for Senate in Arizona, has repeatedly said the U.S. should clean house on the senior ranks of the military, pushing the claim that all the generals and admirals are “woke” and “left-wing” losers who’ve never won a war.​
His solution? Fire them all, and promote “the most conservative colonels.”​
Click to expand...
This is a MAGA movement to go after good officers who stood for or still stands to protect the US from domestic terrorism. imo

Republicans are gearing up to wage a war on Gen. Mark Milley

www.msn.com

It’s a clear sign that the increasingly MAGA-infused GOP is keen on waging a war against Milley and painting him as a villain for inappropriately politicizing the military. But the irony of this enterprise is that Milley’s most overtly political behavior has been a response to former President Donald Trump’s instability, authoritarianism and attempts to politicize the military. When his hand was forced, he appropriately chose the track of defending the nation against anti-democratic extremism instead of being deferential to it.

All of it is part of a broader program to try to force the military to yield to MAGA politics.
 
jpn said:
Blake Masters, the Republican nominee for Senate in Arizona, has repeatedly said the U.S. should clean house on the senior ranks of the military, pushing the claim that all the generals and admirals are “woke” and “left-wing” losers who’ve never won a war.​
His solution? Fire them all, and promote “the most conservative colonels.”​
​
Masters obviously never served. The U.S. military is diverse. It is inclusive. It encourages independent thinking (to a degree) and initiative on the part of junior officers.

Leadership includes fostering strong relations and respect for its "blue collar employees," meaning the enlisted ranks.

Firing the professionals and replacing them with political toadies would be a terrific way to destroy the greatest fighting institution on the planet.
Click to expand...
He admires Stalin... ✌️
 
Mycroft said:
Yes. And now we have Generals who "are “woke” and “left-wing” losers who’ve never won a war".

That's why we need to fire the CinC.
Click to expand...
" Left wing losers who never won a war???
LOL
we won WWI and Woodrow Wilson was a Dem.
we won WWII and FDR was a DEM President
we lost the Korean " War " when it ended in 1953 and IKE was President and he was a Republican,
the Viet Nam war ended when Nixon was President and He was a Republican
and TRUMP signed the " agreement " that gave the Taliban EVERYTHING they were fighting for for 20 years and he was a Republican
so just how is it the " “left-wing” losers who’ve never won a war". when it was REPUBLICAN Presidents that walked away from the last 3 wars we were in.
NO it was NOT the " Left wing losers " but the RIGHT WING LOSERS
Please do a little research before you open your mouth and tell lies
Have a nice night
 
Tbird19482 said:
" Left wing losers who never won a war???
LOL
we won WWI and Woodrow Wilson was a Dem.
we won WWII and FDR was a DEM President
we lost the Korean " War " when it ended in 1953 and IKE was President and he was a Republican,
the Viet Nam war ended when Nixon was President and He was a Republican
and TRUMP signed the " agreement " that gave the Taliban EVERYTHING they were fighting for for 20 years and he was a Republican
so just how is it the " “left-wing” losers who’ve never won a war". when it was REPUBLICAN Presidents that walked away from the last 3 wars we were in.
NO it was NOT the " Left wing losers " but the RIGHT WING LOSERS
Please do a little research before you open your mouth and tell lies
Have a nice night
Click to expand...
yawn...

What part of the word "now" do you not understand?
 
Mycroft said:
yawn...

What part of the word "now" do you not understand?
Click to expand...
well lets see just what left wing President has lost a war NOW?? or in the last well over 100 YEARS.
NONE it was Trump that GAVE EVERYTHING to the Taliban that they have been fighting for for 20 years and we were fighting against and THOUSANDS of Americans died and over 20 Thousand injured JUST read it.
there has NOT been a " Left wing President " loose a war in OVER a 100 YEARS so don't try and say the left wing are the ones losing them
MAYBE it the right wing President didn't keep sticking their noses in and let the Military do their job we wouldn't be losing wars. EX Nixon in Nam every time we turned around there was a cease fire WE had to stand down and could NOT resupply but the North did . they kept moving more and more supplies into the South while they were talking
Nixon screwed the Military.
Have a nice day
 
Last edited:
Indlib said:
The problem is, like everything else to MAGAs, the military is only as good and professional as Trump and his sychophants say it is.
Click to expand...
I imagine this will be great for cohesion….. about as great as having an SS jackass shouting over your shoulder all the time because you might not be bloodthirsty enough.
 
Tbird19482 said:
well lets see just what left wing President has lost a war NOW?? or in the last well over 100 YEARS.
NONE it was Trump that GAVE EVERYTHING to the Taliban that they have been fighting for for 20 years and we were fighting against and THOUSANDS of Americans died and over 20 Thousand injured JUST read it.
there has NOT been a " Left wing President " loose a war in OVER a 100 YEARS so don't try and say the left wing are the ones losing them
MAYBE it the right wing President didn't keep sticking their noses in and let the Military do their job we wouldn't be losing wars. EX Nixon in Nam every time we turned around there was a cease fire WE had to stand down and could NOT resupply but the North did . they kept moving more and more supplies into the South while they were talking
Nixon screwed the Military.
Have a nice day
Click to expand...
LOL!!

Who gave the Taliban $58 BILLION in military hardware?

Hint: That was last year. Trump wasn't President.
 
Mycroft said:
LOL!!

Who gave the Taliban $58 BILLION in military hardware?

Hint: That was last year. Trump wasn't President.
Click to expand...
Why don't you read the " AGREEMENT " Trump signed and stop making a fool of yourself by asking stupid questions
IF the Taliban had kept their word they wouldn't have got that equipment that just shows us just how stupid Trump really is thinking they would keep their word.

Yahoo Search - Web Search

The search engine that helps you find exactly what you're looking for. Find the most relevant information, video, images, and answers from all across the Web.
search.yahoo.com search.yahoo.com
www.factcheck.org

Timeline of U.S. Withdrawal from Afghanistan - FactCheck.org

We lay out many of the key diplomatic decisions, military actions, presidential pronouncements and expert assessments of the withdrawal agreement that ended the U.S. military's 20-year war in Afghanistan.
www.factcheck.org www.factcheck.org
thehill.com

Trump’s deal with the Taliban set the stage for the Afghan collapse

The real date that the Taliban’s victory was assured is Feb. 29, 2020, the day the Trump administration signed what it characterized as a “peace” deal with the Taliban.
thehill.com thehill.com
time.com

President Trump's Disgraceful Peace Deal with the Taliban

The Afghanistan peace plan will strengthen the Taliban and make America less safe.
time.com time.com

I had the "agreement " as it was printed up and IF I remember right Trump gave them foreign aid
so is Biden going by TRUMP'S " AGREEMENT "
Heck TRUMP gave them everything what the heck why not some Foreign aid
Have a nice day
 
Tbird19482 said:
Why don't you read the " AGREEMENT " Trump signed and stop making a fool of yourself by asking stupid questions
IF the Taliban had kept their word they wouldn't have got that equipment that just shows us just how stupid Trump really is thinking they would keep their word.
Click to expand...
Trump had a contingency within the agreement to deal with the Taliban not keeping their word. Biden didn't use that contingency.

So...the loss of military equipment was all on Biden.

Look. You've pulled this far off topic. If you want to discuss this further, start a thread. Add to the dozens of threads that already exist on this topic. Have fun with it.

You are dismissed.
 
Mycroft said:
LOL!!

Who gave the Taliban $58 BILLION in military hardware?

Hint: That was last year. Trump wasn't President.
Click to expand...

What was Biden supposed to do, demand the Afghan Army turn in all their weapons before we left?
 
Mycroft said:
Trump had a contingency within the agreement to deal with the Taliban not keeping their word. Biden didn't use that contingency.

So...the loss of military equipment was all on Biden.

Look. You've pulled this far off topic. If you want to discuss this further, start a thread. Add to the dozens of threads that already exist on this topic. Have fun with it.

You are dismissed.
Click to expand...
HE did????????????????????????
Please show us where.
Have a nice day
 
Callen said:
Hate to tell Masters this but almost without exception top military people are conservative, not MAGA but conservative.
Click to expand...

Exactly what I was going to say. Very very few "woke" in the military.
 
Mycroft said:
Trump had a contingency within the agreement to deal with the Taliban not keeping their word. Biden didn't use that contingency.

So...the loss of military equipment was all on Biden.

Look. You've pulled this far off topic. If you want to discuss this further, start a thread. Add to the dozens of threads that already exist on this topic. Have fun with it.

You are dismissed.
Click to expand...
and YOU also haven't shown us where the LEFT WING had lost a war like you have said they have ,
EVERY war we have ever lost back over a HUNDRED years has been under REPUBLICAN Presidents
Have a nice day
 
Mycroft said:
LOL!!

Who gave the Taliban $58 BILLION in military hardware?

Hint: That was last year. Trump wasn't President.
Click to expand...
Who was President when the military hardware was brought into Afghanistan?
Hint: most of it was not delivered under the current President.

Your post is a bit dishonest. The hardware was for the Afghanistan government at the time it was delivered. They decided to concede to the Taliban.
How is President Trump's agreement with the Taliban working out for the US and the Afghanistan people?
 
Mycroft said:
Yes. And now we have Generals who "are “woke” and “left-wing” losers who’ve never won a war".

That's why we need to fire the CinC.
Click to expand...
Which conservative generals won a war? Have we even won a war recently?
 
As Pres. Washington said the US military is the final bulwark of the nation against the willful designs and malevolent plans and purposes of a would be dictator.

Which is why the first Congress of the new United States honored Pres. Washington's request to create an oath for the armed forces.

The armed forces oath was the first bill and the first law enacted by the First Session of the First Congress as Public Law 1, Chapter 1 and signed into law by Potus Washington on June 1st 1789.

The armed forces would act as the last bulwark of democracy under civilian control and leadership that remains democratic -- according to Washington's keenly stated intent and purpose. It's what Potus Washington could foresee as a possibility in our experiment in democracy that he knew needed to be addressed.

Blank Masters had better believe Milley and the armed forces are prepared and ready for any eventuality involving an election and a dictator tyrant groveling for absolute power.

Trump meanwhile couldn't get any GI's out of anywhere, miserable CinC that he was and never will be again. Neither would the armed forces join his insurrection. In the Military Times Pentagon authorized annual poll across all services and ranks, the only one of its kind, only Obama ranked lower (by 3 points) in approval than Trump did by the time Trump got run out of office to include by the military vote. Putin's Guy Michael Flynn got nowhere proposing the armed forces move into blue states in 2020 to seize voting machines and the election personnel to rerun the voting so Trump would win.

The armed forces know they are the final bulwark against a dictator tyrant seizing power, and that the armed forces will always be controlled and led by elected civilian leadership that is loyal to the Constitution and sworn to it. So this Blank nothingness has no chance but to end badly for PutinTrump & Rowers.
 
poweRob said:
Click to expand...


You know that is not a "thing", right?

I still laugh whenever I see that. It was literally created from a bunch of people on 4chan about 5 years ago that wanted to troll "Liberals", so they created a meme trying to equate that old hand sign with "White Supremacy". And like morons, now a lot of people believe it is real. And now use it as their opening claim about anybody they are against.

Well, better add this to the list, obviously one of the leaders of the Racists.

obama-blog2010.jpg
 
Oozlefinch said:
You know that is not a "thing", right?

I still laugh whenever I see that. It was literally created from a bunch of people on 4chan about 5 years ago that wanted to troll "Liberals", so they created a meme trying to equate that old hand sign with "White Supremacy". And like morons, now a lot of people believe it is real. And now use it as their opening claim about anybody they are against.

Well, better add this to the list, obviously one of the leaders of the Racists.

obama-blog2010.jpg
Click to expand...
It was adopted by white supremacy movements. That's what made 4chan folk so ecstatic. So yes... it is a thing. Differing intents depending on whose using it and why.
 
poweRob said:
It was adopted by white supremacy movements. That's what made 4chan folk so ecstatic. So yes... it is a thing. Differing intents depending on whose using it and why.
Click to expand...

You obviously do not understand the meaning of the word "troll".

So tell me, who determines the "intent", and "who" can use it or not?

Either it absolutely is such a sign, or it is not at all and any such claims should be discarded as coming from a poisoned well.

Oh, and it was not "adopted" by anybody. They only took it up to troll as well. And that is the funniest part to me, in that now those that scream about it are literally trolling themselves. And not even realizing how many of us are laughing at them whenever they repeat this claim.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom