• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Black Female Conservative Calls Out President Biden for a Fight

Nothing is gonna stop that. There are threads about Jill Biden’s legwear.

GOP is kinda lost right now.

Yeah, really. People are confused. In a world where the leader of the white supremacist Proud Boys is some Afro-Cuban guy... hey, why not have an African American GOP member?
 
Candace Owens is reeeeeally dumb.

Hey, that seems to be almost a job requirement to be a GOP politician these days. The more stupid stuff you can come up with to say, and the louder and more aggressively you can say it, the more of a bump in the polls you will get. Jewish space laser lady isn't the only one who has figured this out by now.
 
Hey, that seems to be almost a job requirement to be a GOP politician these days. The more stupid stuff you can come up with to say, and the louder and more aggressively you can say it, the more of a bump in the polls you will get. Jewish space laser lady isn't the only one who has figured this out by now.

It just be equal parts nightmarish and easy pandering to that base.
 
Well
Hey, that seems to be almost a job requirement to be a GOP politician these days. The more stupid stuff you can come up with to say, and the louder and more aggressively you can say it, the more of a bump in the polls you will get. Jewish space laser lady isn't the only one who has figured this out by now.

So, are you going substantiate with facts the stupid stuff she comes up?
 
It just be equal parts nightmarish and easy pandering to that base.

Facts or just rhetoric? (language designed to have a persuasive or impressive effect on its audience, but often regarded as lacking in sincerity or meaningful content)
 
So, are you going substantiate with facts the stupid stuff she comes up?

Facts don’t matter anymore. Its not about facts at all. That’s a very quaint and obsolete concept. It’s now only about whether what’s being said is entertaining or pleasing to the audience- like a WWE episode.

When the unanimous consensus of every single science organization on the entire planet, with a century and a half of data, and mountains of data and observations on climate change is dismissed as fake news- when the recommendations of all the specialist doctors, scientists, and public health specialists are dismissed during a deadly pandemic- but then when they spend 6 years straight searching for Obama’s secret birth certificate, and put Jewish space laser lady in Congress with important committee assignments to boot- what facts could possibly ever substantiate anything for them?
 
Not always. I've heard him express himself quite well. However, in addition to mistakes or inaccuracies which all politicians make, he at times appears confused, can't remember or follow a train of thought and and mumbles while he's talking. To be honest, I'm somewhat embarrassed for him. There are just too many occurrences to excuse it as lack of eloquence. I won't go as far to say its a result of some developing some mental disease, but I understand why some people do.

That is inaccurate, he always made these foot in mouth comments, even when he was not old. The man just sometimes flaps out things he thinks but should not say because it might be a good thought with good intentions but it comes out really crappy.
 
Facts don’t matter anymore. Its not about facts at all. That’s a very quaint and obsolete concept. It’s now only about whether what’s being said is entertaining or pleasing to the audience- like a WWE episode.

When the unanimous consensus of every single science organization on the entire planet, with a century and a half of data, and mountains of data and observations on climate change is dismissed as fake news- when the recommendations of all the specialist doctors, scientists, and public health specialists are dismissed during a deadly pandemic- but then when they spend 6 years straight searching for Obama’s secret birth certificate, and put Jewish space laser lady in Congress with important committee assignments to boot- what facts could possibly ever substantiate anything for them?

So, you call somebody stupid and your answer is , "it's not about the facts" and "It’s now only about whether what’s being said"

And, your entire justification is about climate change, the pandemic, a birth certificate, and Jewish space lady?

OK, you have no facts, so you must have examples or statements of what she's said that was so stupid!

What are they?
 
Last edited:
So, you call somebody stupid and your answer is , "it's not about the facts" and "It’s now only about whether what’s being said"

And, your entire justification is about climate change, the pandemic, a birth certificate, and Jewish space lady?


OK, you have no facts, so you must have examples or statements of what she's said that was so stupid!

What are they?

The head of the white supremacist group Proud Boys is some Afro-Cuban guy. Stupid? You bet.

But I bet you can’t come up with anything he has said that would make him sound stupid, rather than just the bigot that he is.
 
That is inaccurate, he always made these foot in mouth comments, even when he was not old. The man just sometimes flaps out things he thinks but should not say because it might be a good thought with good intentions but it comes out really crappy.

Yes, he may flap out comments with good intentions. I'm talking about.....

"he at times appears confused, can't remember or follow a train of thought and and mumbles while he's talking"

Can you give me a few examples/videos from the 8 years he served as vice president with President Obama? I'll find a few in the last year that show you the difference.
 
Facts or just rhetoric? (language designed to have a persuasive or impressive effect on its audience, but often regarded as lacking in sincerity or meaningful content)

She is clearly uneducated on the topics she opines on. And she praised Hitler once.
 
The head of the white supremacist group Proud Boys is some Afro-Cuban guy. Stupid? You bet.

But I bet you can’t come up with anything he has said that would make him sound stupid, rather than just the bigot that he is.

In post 104, you responded to the statement Candace Owens is reeeeeally dumb.

I was referring to Candice Owens, you apparently are talking about somebody else.
 
In post 104, you responded to the statement Candace Owens is reeeeeally dumb.

I was referring to Candice Owens, you apparently are talking about somebody else.

African Americans who join the party of the Southern Strategy and the recent Georgia election laws can’t be too bright.
 
And she praised Hitler once.[/QUOTE]

"But if Hitler just wanted to make Germany great and have things run well, OK, fine."

“I actually don’t have any problems at all with the word ‘nationalism,'” Owens said. “I think that the definition gets poisoned by elitists that actually want globalism. “Whenever we say nationalism, the first thing people think about, at least in America, is Hitler,” Owens said. “He was a national socialist. But if Hitler just wanted to make Germany great and have things run well, OK, fine. “The problem is that … he wanted to globalize. He wanted everybody to be German, everybody to be speaking German … To me, that’s not nationalism. In thinking about how we could go bad down the line, I don’t really have an issue with nationalism. I really don’t.

Are you referring to the 30 second clip that Mr. Lieu played out of 2 hr out of her discussion on Nationalism and Globalism? How about the full question asked of her, and her full answer? How about her response to Mr. Nader who misquoted her even during the hearing, and her response?

The full statement is on the twitter link below. Her response to Mr Nader in the CNN link below.

If within the context of a discussion about Nationalism and Globalism, and after reviewing the videos on these 2 links, you think she was praising Hitler and uneducated on the subject, that's fine.


 
"But if Hitler just wanted to make Germany great and have things run well, OK, fine."

“I actually don’t have any problems at all with the word ‘nationalism,'” Owens said. “I think that the definition gets poisoned by elitists that actually want globalism. “Whenever we say nationalism, the first thing people think about, at least in America, is Hitler,” Owens said. “He was a national socialist. But if Hitler just wanted to make Germany great and have things run well, OK, fine. “The problem is that … he wanted to globalize. He wanted everybody to be German, everybody to be speaking German … To me, that’s not nationalism. In thinking about how we could go bad down the line, I don’t really have an issue with nationalism. I really don’t.

Are you referring to the 30 second clip that Mr. Lieu played out of 2 hr out of her discussion on Nationalism and Globalism? How about the full question asked of her, and her full answer? How about her response to Mr. Nader who misquoted her even during the hearing, and her response?

The full statement is on the twitter link below. Her response to Mr Nader in the CNN link below.

If within the context of a discussion about Nationalism and Globalism, and after reviewing the videos on these 2 links, you think she was praising Hitler and uneducated on the subject, that's fine.




Yup. That’s the comment where she praises Hitler. Thanks!
 
Yup. That’s the comment where she praises Hitler. Thanks!

Yup, I knew, that after an unbiased and thorough review of the videos and statement, you would understand.

Thanks for the concession! (y)
 
Yup, I knew, that after an unbiased and thorough review of the videos and statement, you would understand.

Thanks for the concession! (y)

That’s weird; you pulled up the quote that proved me right. Huh.
 
Back
Top Bottom