- Joined
- Oct 24, 2009
- Messages
- 3,969
- Reaction score
- 1,209
- Location
- Dallas TEXAS
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Yet you have zero evidence to support your "born gay" theory. And thats the point.
The reaction and the fact 95% of the people living on this planet kind of makes that point
Its been fun kids. But since none of you can argue a different biological sexual reaction in homosexuals vs heterosexuals and you cannot deny heterosexual sex is the only natural way to procreate, my point has been made.
Have a good day :2wave:
Absolutely not but I recognize the reaction and its genetic link to heterosexual sex.
LOL You are only making my argument stronger.
Yes... and? So you're saying turned on is turned on. And....?You are not listening. Fetishes can turn people on sexually but the boilogical sexual reaction remains constant despite what an individual claims to find sexually arousing.
So having sex, having sex a certain way, having children, wanting children, none of that is required for marriage?It is a choice we as a society made to recognize one man and one woman based on the nature's procreation requirments and our natural sexual attractions.
Are you so far gone that you actually CARE what turns other people on?Are you really that far gone you think 95% of the world's population is heterosexual by coincidence?
No clue what you're talking about. There is no "genetic link in one man and one woman"I've proven the genetic link in one man and one woman. You want to change the law based on feeling and not factual evidence.
Difference without a distinction.Nobody can stop them from "marrying." The relevant issue is whether government should or shouldn't recognize such marriages.
Do you have some evidence that fetishes are not genetic or did you just make that up for your argument?LOL Fetishes wouldn't turn people on either. No one is claiming they are genetic :lol:
Sorry sport, you can't change the context of someone else's argument by adding "naturally". Producing a child does not require sex at all.Sorry sport. To produce a child naturally requires heterosexual sex. There is no way beyond it.
What? More stupid responses from the Catholic church to the priest abuse scandals? Say it isn't so!
Because it is. And you didn't even address the statement he DID make.How can anybody consider that a stupid statement?
Sex is everywhere - duh. Welcome to earth.Sex and pedophilia are everywhere.
What's that got to with sex and/or pedophilia?Ever watched Teen-Nickelodeon with your kids? They have shows dedicated to boys asking other boys out, on freaking Nickelodeon!
Yeah, I'm sure it has nothing at all to do with it being more acceptable for people to just be who they are instead of being forced to pretend they're someone else - as they have had to for centuries. :roll:I went back to a high school football game this year and there was gay kids all over the damn place. Boys talking like girls, dressing like girls, and even acting like girls. Where are the parents to allow this? I saw it more in the boys then in the girls. Is it something in the water? But they sure do wear some cute white belts with those cute designer, tight jeans. :rofl:
Sex is advertised everywhere, which is why its important parents are actually there to raise their kids, but since that isn't happening either, you got a bunch of confused, feminine boys running around b/c mom and dad can't keep it together and if they do, are to busy working 2 jobs and letting some stranger raise their kids for them.
Revel in people being free to be themselves? Absolutely I will! Thank you :mrgreen:You are witnessing "tolerance" played out to its logical conclusion. To tolerate everything, is to stand for anarchy. So revel in it folks.
Please do tell us how it's filled with pedophilia.But don't act like society is not filled with sex and pedophilia. Why anybody would disagree with that statement from the Bishop is either deluding themselves or is totally lost in the notion of "tolerance themselves".
Its always humorous for the far left nutballs to claim people don't understand science when they can't even point to science to explain homosexual behavior. In fact the opposite is true.
There are many half baked theories from the failed twins study to the fruit fly fiasco to relying on unsupervised questionnaires but it never changes the basic knowledge of science.
Biological sexual reactions are purely preparation for heterosexual sex. No matter how much the pro gay marriage group screams and cries the biological sexual reaction does not change for hetero or homosexual people. Men still produce and ejaculate sperm and women still divert blood to the uterus in anticipation for conception. These are measured and rock solid constants yet despite the evidence the religion of "homosexuality must be genetic" never ceases to draw new members to its flock based purely on faith alone.
How can anybody consider that a stupid statement?
Sex and pedophilia are everywhere.
Ever watched Teen-Nickelodeon with your kids? They have shows dedicated to boys asking other boys out, on freaking Nickelodeon!
Then you got this which is nothing new:Sex sells: Soft-core pornography still hot stuff on cable TV - latimes.com
Our kids are exposed to sex at daycare ages (2-5). Day in and day out, they are bombarded with it. Nobody can say there has not been a drastic change in the behavior of boys in their teenage years. I went back to a high school football game this year and there was gay kids all over the damn place. Boys talking like girls, dressing like girls, and even acting like girls. Where are the parents to allow this? I saw it more in the boys then in the girls. Is it something in the water? But they sure do wear some cute white belts with those cute designer, tight jeans. :rofl:
Sex is advertised everywhere, which is why its important parents are actually there to raise their kids, but since that isn't happening either, you got a bunch of confused, feminine boys running around b/c mom and dad can't keep it together and if they do, are to busy working 2 jobs and letting some stranger raise their kids for them.
You are witnessing "tolerance" played out to its logical conclusion. To tolerate everything, is to stand for anarchy. So revel in it folks.
But don't act like society is not filled with sex and pedophilia. Why anybody would disagree with that statement from the Bishop is either deluding themselves or is totally lost in the notion of "tolerance themselves".
I think alot of it has to do with this:
It's official: Men really are the weaker sex - Science, News - The Independent
Chemical Cocktail in Consumer Products Destroys Male Fertility
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?