• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Birth control and gun rights are red meat issues that the parties use to divide us.

craig

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 18, 2020
Messages
11,040
Reaction score
4,418
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
The majority of the moderates in both parties can compromise on both these issues. All abortions after second trimester must be medically justified court approved. All gun owners must be registered similar to concealed carry.
 
Make it like some are trying to do for voting and register everyone to own a gun when they reach a certain age.
 
The majority of the moderates in both parties can compromise on both these issues. All abortions after second trimester must be medically justified court approved. All gun owners must be registered similar to concealed carry.
Not original. Why not blog it?
 
Not original. Why not blog it?
Don't know what that means. Just want to insert some common sense into the discussion.
 
Don't know what that means. Just want to insert some common sense into the discussion.
It comes up in nearly every thread discussing those issues.

If it's your opinion you want showcased, blog it.
 
It comes up in nearly every thread discussing those issues.

If it's your opinion you want showcased, blog it.
Does anyone read or discuss a "blog".
 
I am a moderate, or center-right, on most issues. I am, however, opposed to registering all gun owners if it makes a privilege out of what is actually a right (ie in any way "discretionary"), or if it works like it does in most states that require it.

Birth control (I assume you mean abortions actually) isn't really a major issue that drives me to vote one way or the other.
 
Those 2 issues are just a way to obfuscate from the real issue which is race. Some whites are terrified that in less than 30 years that they will be in the minority, desperately trying to erase the words of Jefferson "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness".

Jefferson's words are finally coming true for his black descendants, those he enslaved and those of his fellow southerners.
 
The majority of the moderates in both parties can compromise on both these issues. All abortions after second trimester must be medically justified court approved. All gun owners must be registered similar to concealed carry.
I think you overestimate what people of conscious can compromise on. I'd be interested in what a suitable compromise would be for people who believe in abortion. For those against there isn't much to compromise on. Same for gun ownership. Those who believe in the 2nd amendment believe it's a right and not owning guns is pretty much out of the equation.
What does a moderate think is "fair" compromise?
 
The majority of the moderates in both parties can compromise on both these issues. All abortions after second trimester must be medically justified court approved. All gun owners must be registered similar to concealed carry.
False. They are red meat issues that Republicans use to divide us. It is Republican donors who benefit from these divisions, not Democrats.
 
The majority of the moderates in both parties can compromise on both these issues. All abortions after second trimester must be medically justified court approved. All gun owners must be registered similar to concealed carry.
except registration doesn't apply to criminals so it doesn't even meet a rational basis test for crime control. And the federal government doesn't have any proper power to demand it
 
False. They are red meat issues that Republicans use to divide us. It is Republican donors who benefit from these divisions, not Democrats.
another one of our shit don't smell arguments. Democrats use all sorts of issues to divide people. Attacking gun owners, whining about the "wealthy not paying their fair share" and other lies. The democrats have been trying to balkanize America into warring special interest groups sorted by ethnicity for years. The late great David Broder noted that over 30 years ago
 
The majority of the moderates in both parties can compromise on both these issues. All abortions after second trimester must be medically justified court approved. All gun owners must be registered similar to concealed carry.
FFS!! Court approved. A women is in serious life jeapordy but must wait for a judge to approve what only a qualified doctor has the right to judge appropriate.
 
except registration doesn't apply to criminals so it doesn't even meet a rational basis test for crime control. And the federal government doesn't have any proper power to demand it
Registering a gun has nothing to do with crime control Registering a gun merely makes it so we can know if a gun is stolen nothing more.
 
Registering a gun has nothing to do with crime control Registering a gun merely makes it so we can know if a gun is stolen nothing more.
registration is demanded by every group that wants to ban or severely limit gun rights. that is a good reason to oppose it. IT DOES NOTHING GOOD FOR A GUN OWNER
 
registration is demanded by every group that wants to ban or severely limit gun rights. that is a good reason to oppose it. IT DOES NOTHING GOOD FOR A GUN OWNER
Good old fashion slippery slope arguments. if nothing else you will not let go of trying to scare people into thinking that they will take your gun away.
 
The majority of the moderates in both parties can compromise on both these issues. All abortions after second trimester must be medically justified court approved. All gun owners must be registered similar to concealed carry.

That's some compromise. ~1% of abortions would be banned while 100% of gun owners have to be on some government list for no good reason.
 
Good old fashion slippery slope arguments. if nothing else you will not let go of trying to scare people into thinking that they will take your gun away.

There's nothing wrong with slippery slope arguments, especially when you have direct evidence of a slippery slope actually existing.
 
Good old fashion slippery slope arguments. if nothing else you will not let go of trying to scare people into thinking that they will take your gun away.
except the slippery slope has been proven true dozens of times including the reduction of magazine limits in NY for example. and the fact is-people hostile to legal gun ownership will continue to attack gun ownership. You pretend that those who want to restrict our rights have only one motivation-and harassing lawful gun ownership is not that motivation. In reality, your posts, as well as many of the posts from other gun restrictionists, display an outright hostility towards legal gun owners-calling us "fetishists" gun "fondlers" etc. To think people who spew this sort of venom are ever going to stop with trying to pass more and more harassing laws is specious
 
registration is demanded by every group that wants to ban or severely limit gun rights. that is a good reason to oppose it. IT DOES NOTHING GOOD FOR A GUN OWNER
But if we can train the crooks and thugs that are doing most of the killing to drop their guns before they flee, registration may have some marginal value.
 
Registering a gun has nothing to do with crime control Registering a gun merely makes it so we can know if a gun is stolen nothing more.
How does it allow you to know if a gun is stolen?
 
How does it allow you to know if a gun is stolen?
can someone tell me what benefit gun owners get from registration? The real purpose of registration is to both facilitate future confiscation by knowing who owns what, and by placing the burden of proof on an owner, rather than the government to prove the (non) possession of a firearm
 
can someone tell me what benefit gun owners get from registration? The real purpose of registration is to both facilitate future confiscation by knowing who owns what, and by placing the burden of proof on an owner, rather than the government to prove the (non) possession of a firearm
Make it the same way some want to see voting go. You are automatically registered to own a gun at a certain age.
 
Back
Top Bottom