• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Biodiesel: The answer to foreign oil dependency.

ILikeDubyah said:
All of the things you mentioned (except for extinct species (survival of the fittest) and the Ozone layer, which is actually less important than it was originally made out to be) were renewable. You can always plant tree.

The Ozone layer is not important? I fail to see how a layer that absorbs 98% of the sun's ultraviolet rays and keeps us alive....is not important.

There's a difference between natural extinction and human caused extinction.
While it is true that 99% of all species that ever lived are now extinct by natural process....many of them evolved into new species by the process of speciation...so in fact, all species today are descendants extinct species.

When a species becomes extinct by human intervention, there is no posterity.

When you cut down a forest, you cannot replace it by planting trees, as you suggest, because a forest is more than mere trees. It is an ecosystem where thousands of species live. The world's biodiversity is declining at an unprecedented rate...between 100 and 1,000 (World Conservation Union)times higher than natural rates, depending on whom you believe.
 

First, I said the ozone layer was found to be LESS important than they first brainwashed us to believe.
Second, as for not being able to create an eco-system, what about Bio-sphere & Bio-sphere 2? Biosphere 2 is in the middle of the desert (Down near Tucson), and they created an entire ecosystem out of nothing. It can be done. Back on topic though, I'd say that rather than looking for alternative fuels that will still be burned, they should all take a closer look at the Air Car, and see howe they can improve on it.
 
 

Most of it is already recycled anyway, not much to gain there.
 

How big were those artifical ecosystems? And at what cost? You really think you can replace the Amazon or a Pacific Northwest forest with a Biosphere? And how do you replace the thousands of species that are becoming extinct? From nothing?
 
There is a bio diesel in use now. Hemp seed oil, it is the safest and cleanest burning oil man can use as a pertoleum product. They will not release the ban on Hemp, it's that simple.

http://www.mtn.org/iasa/hempcar.html

http://www.hempcar.org/biofacts.shtml

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread19515/pg1

http://www.rense.com/general67/FORD.HTM

http://www.masscann.org/hempcar.htm

http://india_resource.tripod.com/alternateenergy.html

http://www.montana.edu/wwwpb/ag/baudr318.html

http://www.crrh.org/cannabis/biodiesel.html

Try a search yourself for Hemp Seed oil bio-diesel, the results may amaze you.

KMS
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…