- Joined
- Nov 16, 2005
- Messages
- 2,315
- Reaction score
- 134
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Bill O'Reilly is the popular originator of the great "War on Christmas" debacle. Obviously Christmas came and went without a hitch and a non-Christian (though some Christian groups claim that it is) movie, "The Chronicals of Narnia", was number one at the box office for several weeks.
So what was his true agenda? He doesn't really seem to be so stupid as to believe that there actually is a war on Christmas and therefore Christianity. Perhaps he just trying to keep our minds off of whom the true war is against?
I mean for the Jewish peoples of our world it is not really 2006 it is more like 5768 (forgive me, I am not Jewish and do not know the exact year this is in the Jewish calander). Yet these people have to go by the year 2006 at their jobs, in dating correspondence, while filling out a personal check or filing their taxes.
It is the same for the Muslims for whom the year is somewhere between 1398 and 1404 (again, forgive me I am not a Muslim and I do not know their calender either). Yet they have to live under the same rules of time that the Christians have forced upon all of us.
This month we celebrated the new year and called it 2006 which is really not the year that it is for humanity just the number of years that have passed since Christ, as the messiah, allegedly died on the cross. The only exception I can think of now is the Chinese that have their own new year coming up (and I am not Chinese either so I don't really know what year it is for them but I think that it is still somewhere in the 5,000's).
There is no war on Christmas and no war on Christians either. All there is is what the Christians are doing to our Jewish, Muslim, Chinese, Athiest and Agnostic freinds.
I think Bill O'Reilly, and everyone who agrees with him, might just be full of hate.
BTW, in case you are curious, time does not really mean a lot to me as it is totally based on the revolution of this planet around the sun. Even to date the universe we do it under the conditions of the terms of our existance, as if we are so benevolent.
So what was his true agenda? He doesn't really seem to be so stupid as to believe that there actually is a war on Christmas and therefore Christianity. Perhaps he just trying to keep our minds off of whom the true war is against?
I mean for the Jewish peoples of our world it is not really 2006 it is more like 5768 (forgive me, I am not Jewish and do not know the exact year this is in the Jewish calander). Yet these people have to go by the year 2006 at their jobs, in dating correspondence, while filling out a personal check or filing their taxes.
It is the same for the Muslims for whom the year is somewhere between 1398 and 1404 (again, forgive me I am not a Muslim and I do not know their calender either). Yet they have to live under the same rules of time that the Christians have forced upon all of us.
This month we celebrated the new year and called it 2006 which is really not the year that it is for humanity just the number of years that have passed since Christ, as the messiah, allegedly died on the cross. The only exception I can think of now is the Chinese that have their own new year coming up (and I am not Chinese either so I don't really know what year it is for them but I think that it is still somewhere in the 5,000's).
There is no war on Christmas and no war on Christians either. All there is is what the Christians are doing to our Jewish, Muslim, Chinese, Athiest and Agnostic freinds.
I think Bill O'Reilly, and everyone who agrees with him, might just be full of hate.
BTW, in case you are curious, time does not really mean a lot to me as it is totally based on the revolution of this planet around the sun. Even to date the universe we do it under the conditions of the terms of our existance, as if we are so benevolent.