• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bill Clinton To Speak Tuesday Night At the DNC - Fee?

Kushinator said:
This thread had soooooo much promise! If only it could have went on for 10 pages.....
Click to expand...

Yes, it would have been fun. However, someone got their panties in a bunch and had to screw it up because they got suckered.
 
radcen said:
Did he really? He should have been happy somebody remembered his name and woke him up.
Click to expand...

HAHA no he didn't. It was in response to Risky's OP (yes, I was one of the ones who knew this was a spoof because i opened the link in his OP).

Who in their right mind would pay Charles in Charge $1 million?
 
iguanaman said:
It's no more of a hoax than most all of the stuff you say and "believe" about the Clintons. They have been the most abused first family in history and I hope you are proud. And do you know what through them and their unprecedented 2nd trip to the Whitehouse we all get to thumb our noses at you all.....and it feels good.
Click to expand...

Lets all have a nice cry for the Clinton's. :lol:
 
tres borrachos said:
HAHA no he didn't. It was in response to Risky's OP (yes, I was one of the ones who knew this was a spoof because i opened the link in his OP).

Who in their right mind would pay Charles in Charge $1 million?
Click to expand...
Got me. :3oops: :lol:

On the one hand it seemed far-fetched, but on the other hand political truth is often stranger than fiction, so... :2razz:
 
radcen said:
Got me. :3oops: :lol:

On the one hand it seemed far-fetched, but on the other hand political truth is often stranger than fiction, so... :2razz:
Click to expand...

Of course, I will admit, I did watch the mini-series from a few years ago. "Scott Baio is 45 and Still Single" or something like that. It was pretty eye opening. I had a huge crush on him when I was younger. He and I are pretty much the same age. He was a pretty cute fellow. And remember, he was the first man to be engaged to Pamela Anderson, right after she became famous courtesy of Playboy. He dated lots and lots of bunnies.
 
eohrnberger said:
I'll admit I got taken in by the OP
Click to expand...

While denying that you believe things simply because you like the way they sound without regard for whether they are actually true

if you do the same
Click to expand...

I didn't do the same. I actually clicked on the link in the OP because I choose to withold belief until something is proven to be true. You, on the other hand, believed something because "someone on the internet said it's true" and you like the way it sounds
 
tres borrachos said:
HAHA no he didn't. It was in response to Risky's OP (yes, I was one of the ones who knew this was a spoof because i opened the link in his OP).

Who in their right mind would pay Charles in Charge $1 million?
Click to expand...

Yeah but I might give Chachi a few bucks.
 
tres borrachos said:
HAHA no he didn't. It was in response to Risky's OP (yes, I was one of the ones who knew this was a spoof because i opened the link in his OP).

Who in their right mind would pay Charles in Charge $1 million?
Click to expand...

I knew you knew as soon as you posted the Scott Baio post. Thank you for not spilling the beans. It was fun while it lasted.
 
Henrin said:
What's ya gotta do, pass some laws to punish people? :lamo
Click to expand...

No. That would be a Trump payback. We will settle for 8 more years of a Clinton Whitehouse. That is payback enough.
 
iguanaman said:
No. That would be a Trump payback. We will settle for 8 more years of a Clinton Whitehouse. That is payback enough.
Click to expand...

But we all be meanies to them for the next eight years. :lamo
 
Henrin said:
But we all be meanies to them for the next eight years. :lamo
Click to expand...

That 's the beauty of the Clinton's. What doesn't kill them makes them stronger. No wonder the right is so afraid.
 
iguanaman said:
That 's the beauty of the Clinton's. What doesn't kill them makes them stronger. No wonder the right is so afraid.
Click to expand...

Do you think the rape accusations following Bill for decades has made him stronger?
 
sangha said:
While denying that you believe things simply because you like the way they sound without regard for whether they are actually true



I didn't do the same. I actually clicked on the link in the OP because I choose to withold belief until something is proven to be true. You, on the other hand, believed something because "someone on the internet said it's true" and you like the way it sounds
Click to expand...

Of course not. I didn't expect you to own up to being in denial as to Hill and Bill's long sordid history of corruption and scandals. Just can't get past your partisan blinkers.
 
eohrnberger said:
Of course not. I didn't expect you to own up to being in denial as to Hill and Bill's long sordid history of corruption and scandals. Just can't get past your partisan blinkers.
Click to expand...

All you've done is prove that you will believe anything simply because you want it to be true.
 
sangha said:
All you've done is prove that you will believe anything simply because you want it to be true.
Click to expand...

Hill and Bill's long sordid history of corruption and scandals is well documented in the press.
There is no 'because you want it to be true' about it.
 
eohrnberger said:
Hill and Bill's long sordid history of corruption and scandals is well documented in the press.
There is no 'because you want it to be true' about it.
Click to expand...

What is well documented is how many of them are false and you know it. Falsehoods and innuendos are the meat in all of them.
 
eohrnberger said:
Hill and Bill's long sordid history of corruption and scandals is well documented in the press.
Click to expand...

No it hasn't

But I can understand why someone who believes everything they read simply because it says what they want to hear would believe it's been documented
 
sangha said:
No it hasn't

But I can understand why someone who believes everything they read simply because it says what they want to hear would believe it's been documented
Click to expand...

I can't understand why someone would ignore that which is true but don't want to hear it, see it, or acknowledge it.

iguanaman said:
What is well documented is how many of them are false and you know it. Falsehoods and innuendos are the meat in all of them.
Click to expand...

Next you are going to try and tell me that Hill & Bill are as pure as the driven snow. Sorry, no sale.
 
eohrnberger said:
I can't understand why someone would ignore that which is true but don't want to hear it, see it, or acknowledge it.



Next you are going to try and tell me that Hill & Bill are as pure as the driven snow. Sorry, no sale.
Click to expand...

You have proven that you are not capable of determining which stories are true and which are not.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom