Hunter? Always an original comeback.And Biden, the man you seem proud to have voted for has the country in a huge mess. It also looks as if we are going to discover that he lied about knowing about his son Hunter's illegal dealings with foreign countries will Old Joe was VP.
If ya' don't want to support the troops when they come home, don't send them overseas.The projected cost of this PACT bill calculates to $74,000,000 dollar per day. That's $74 million dollars...every day for the next 10 years. (not sure what happens after that.)
Maybe the proposal is worth all the money. Dunno. But would be great for someone in government to itemize where all that cash is going. Seems like a lot for filling a gap that for some reason has been under the radar for all these decades.
..
The ones that celebrated when they killed it out of revenge.He's ready to sign a bill helping US veterans. If only Republicans in the Senate were willing to send him that bill.
Let us know when that IF becomes reality.And Biden, the man you seem proud to have voted for has the country in a huge mess. It also looks as if we are going to discover that he lied about knowing about his son Hunter's illegal dealings with foreign countries will Old Joe was VP.
Making a virtual appearance is the responsible thing to do when one has a COVID diagnosis. I am proud that he made that choice.Nice of Captain Asthma to make a virtual appearance.
If ya' don't want to support the troops when they come home, don't send them overseas.
And Biden, the man you seem proud to have voted for has the country in a huge mess. It also looks as if we are going to discover that he lied about knowing about his son Hunter's illegal dealings with foreign countries will Old Joe was VP.
WTF is this "captain asthma" bullshit anyway? Joe's not the one who need help to navigate a shallow ramp.Get over what? There's no doubt in my mind that Captain Asthma was planning to show up in person for that unplanned meeting. I'm sure it had nothing to do with the vote, either. Just a classy guy wanting to hand out some pizza.
Oh please, they all voted for it a few weeks ago. This is just another RWNJ temper tantrum. They're like a buncha spoiled little kids, lashing out at their own suppoprters becuase they're pissed at the democrats.The projected cost of this PACT bill calculates to $74,000,000 dollar per day. That's $74 million dollars...every day for the next 10 years. (not sure what happens after that.)
Maybe the proposal is worth all the money. Dunno. But would be great for someone in government to itemize where all that cash is going. Seems like a lot for filling a gap that for some reason has been under the radar for all these decades.
..
Of course.....you know him as your Dear Leader....aka the orange godlet.Who?
YOu mean like corporal Bone Spurs?What's that got to do with being a draft-dodger?
Bullshit. His son served. He knows.Truly a nice gesture but I'm afraid if he was so low in polls and having so many people bail on him he wouldn't be doing it. He's digging for some points.
They all voted for it a few weeks ago.Remove the non-related $400B spending and the bill will pass.
They all voted for it a few weeks ago.The point of my post seems to have slipped by you.
Am all for supporting veterans. And attending to medical treatment for burn pit ailments that have somehow (reportedly) gone unaddressed for all these years.
But how much of this massive spending bill is actually going to be spent on the topic that is cited in the emotional title ("Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics Act" HR3967)?? Appears a majority of the spending is for a variety of other unrelated items.
$74,000,000. $74 million dollars per day. For forever.
..
temporarily ???I suppose Trumpism can temporarily return to ugliness being the point.
temporarily ???
have a nice day
Truly a nice gesture but I'm afraid if he was so low in polls and having so many people bail on him he wouldn't be doing it. He's digging for some points.
Remove the non-related $400B spending and the bill will pass.
That's what the link says.There is no “non-related” spending.
That was then.They all voted for it a few weeks ago.
it was the temporarily thing IMO it is always but oh wellEvil is usually the point, but yes, sometimes it's just ugliness that they go for.
read the billThat's what the link says.
The link was adequate in explaining.read the bill
Have a nice day
The link was adequate in explaining.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?