- Joined
- Dec 11, 2020
- Messages
- 1,659
- Reaction score
- 2,325
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
And that, my friends, is the ultimate question we're eventually going to have to come to grips with. Do we let the implicit, or explicit, threat of nuclear weapons immobilize us to the point that a monster like Putin can do pretty much anything he wants?
The parallels to Hitler's expansion in Europe circa 1938 are both unavoidable and accurate.
We as a nation [and a world] are going to have to decide if allowing a madman to have his way due exclusively to nuclear threats is a better or worse outcome than the threat of WW3.
The rest of this is all just noise. This is the only salient question facing this nation and the world.
The parallels to Hitler's expansion in Europe circa 1938 are both unavoidable and accurate.
We as a nation [and a world] are going to have to decide if allowing a madman to have his way due exclusively to nuclear threats is a better or worse outcome than the threat of WW3.
The rest of this is all just noise. This is the only salient question facing this nation and the world.