Biden’s corporate tax plan is simple, yet revolutionary.

[Patriotic Voter]

Socialists, progressives and other wealth vandals, always pretend that their envy-based schemes are for the greater good. Why do you have a valid argument against what a CEO makes? That is between him and his board of directors. Claiming they don't pay their fair share is envy laden bullshit. Chances are, they pay more in a year than you will pay in your life.

Socialists are not Democrats. You know that. Progressives are at the far left end of the Democratic Party platform. You have to know that too. There is no such thing as wealth vandalism either. Vandalism is a type of robbery that requires going inside a home to go steal a person's actual assets. I am sure you have known that longer than the word progressive has meant extreme Democrat.

Where is your valid argument against helping the poor who have no way to earn money on their own? Do you want them to die of extreme poverty just because rich people refuse to pay their fair share? Do you even know what a fair share is in terms of taxes paid or did you just make up your own definition?

 

[AFrench2]

people who run major corporations tend to be smarter than politicians

People who run major corporations tend to run politicians.

 

[TurtleDude]

Socialists are not Democrats. You know that. Progressives are at the far left end of the Democratic Party platform. You have to know that too. There is no such thing as wealth vandalism either. Vandalism is a type of robbery that requires going inside a home to go steal a person's actual assets. I am sure you have known that longer than the word progressive has meant extreme Democrat.

Where is your valid argument against helping the poor who have no way to earn money on their own? Do you want them to die of extreme poverty just because rich people refuse to pay their fair share? Do you even know what a fair share is in terms of taxes paid or did you just make up your own definition?

I have yet to actually see a definitive differentiation between the various strains of the disease known as collectivism

 

[TurtleDude]

People who run major corporations tend to run politicians.

Yeah, that has lots of merit

 

[Patriotic Voter]

I have yet to actually see a definitive differentiation between the various strains of the disease known as collectivism

You know for a fact there is no disease called collectivsm.

 

[Patriotic Voter]

You claim you are smarter than I am. Whatever helps you sleep at night. and yes, I am far smarter than Graham or AOC.

Nobody who fails to correctly read the Constitution's Second Amendment and supports giving kids firearms is smarter than AOC.

 

[TurtleDude]

Nobody who fails to correctly read the Constitution's Second Amendment and supports giving kids firearms is smarter than AOC.

she's not very bright, her academic credentials are OK, and your interpretation of the second amendment is contrary to every controlling supreme court case and contrary to the writings of every major constitutional scholar.

 

[TurtleDude]

You know for a fact there is no disease called collectivsm.

collectivism has killed more people in the last century than almost any other plague

 

[Patriotic Voter]

Collectivism has killed more people in the last century than almost any other plague.

Again, collectivism is not a disease. There is no reason to compare it to one.

I am still waiting for a valid detailed argument against helping the poor via repealing tax cuts on the rich and making them pay their fair share. Metaphors do not exist on this topic.

 

[TurtleDude]

Again, collectivism is not a disease. There is no reason to compare it to one.

I am still waiting for a valid detailed argument against helping the poor via repealing tax cuts on the rich and making them pay their fair share.

do you think the CDC should study "gun violence"?

 

[Patriotic Voter]

Do you think the CDC should study "gun violence"?

Do you have any answers to my original question?

I will not answer your questions until you answer mine.

 

[TurtleDude]

Do you have any answers to my original question?

I will not answer your questions until you answer mine.

I suspect you would answer yes, meaning you think disease can mean more than pathogens.

 

[Patriotic Voter]

I suspect you would answer yes, meaning you think disease can mean more than pathogens.

This thread and my question are only about taxes, not diseases. And I was very clear diseases only mean medical, not financial, problems. You keep deflecting.

 

[TurtleDude]

This thread and my question are only about taxes, not diseases. And I was very clear diseases only mean medical, not financial, problems. You keep deflecting.

I think collectivism is a mental illness

 

[Patriotic Voter]

I think collectivism is a mental illness.

Collectivism is not any kind of illness. You made up that idea.

My question was: WHAT VALID ARGUMENT DO YOU HAVE AGAINST HELPING THE POOR BY MAKING RICH PEOPLE PAY THEIR FAIR SHARE?

 

[TurtleDude]

Collectivism is not any kind of illness. You made up that idea.

My question was: WHAT VALID ARGUMENT DO YOU HAVE AGAINST HELPING THE POOR BY MAKING RICH PEOPLE PAY THEIR FAIR SHARE?

the rich pay more than their fair share so your question is stupid. and I don't believe the rich paying more actually helps the poor

 

[Excon]

Yes, so we should let the corporations bend the public over and take it up the ass with more gubment money.

Why do you have a problem with "the people" getting their own money back?

They vote against their own interests out of some misguided sense of duty, and curl up in a ball when the beating comes.

I see, you want them to vote selfishly.

 

[Patriotic Voter]

the rich pay more than their fair share so your question is stupid. and I don't believe the rich paying more actually helps the poor

What is your valid argument against helping the poor via repealing tax cuts?

 

[TurtleDude]

What is your valid argument against helping the poor via repealing tax cuts?

another stupid question -repealing tax cuts don't hurt the poor

 

[Lafayette]

you seem to think that some doing well prevents others from doing well.

Define "doing well". THAT is the megabuck question.

And those who would "do nothing" except lower upper-income taxation, as Donald-Dork did during his reign, IS NOT THE ANSWER .... !

 

[Lafayette]

DANGEROUS SOCIAL DECREPITUDE

another stupid question -repealing tax cuts don't hurt the poor

More blah-blah-blah from the Rabid-Right, who have their collective heads down a hole which is why they do not see the dangerous decrepitude of life-at-the-bottom in president day America.

What must happen? That the poor revolt and burn down your house? Can't happen? Better yet, at the next rally against human-unfairness do knock someone down and then four of your-kind sit squarely on them for 20 minutes to see what happens ... !

Push a person to the financial-extreme and expect backfire - that's "real-freedom" ...

 

[iguanaman]

I have no problem with it in principle but it just seems like another name for a tariff. I support tariffs in principle when they are used to balance trade.

Tariffs on goods never work to "balance" anything. We do it here for sugar and it costs us Americans billions a year and outsources jobs too. Candy companies had no choice but to move to Canada or Mexico because sugar was so much cheaper there. All to subsidize a few big corporations with a small number of employees.

 

[trouble13]

It is about wanting what is best for everyone, not having a privileged few and millions of others struggling to make ends meet. As someone who personally experiences the consequences of essentially having no money every day except for three stimulus checks I have every right to complain about CEOs saving too much money via income tax cuts. The amount of money they save by not paying their fair share would make poor people feel like they are getting rich if it went to them instead of a rich man's savings account. I assume at no time did you ever rely on your mom to transfer money to your bank account just because no rich people were willing to help pay taxes for anything that could help you earn and keep it. Let me know when you do.

Here is the problem I see with the argument your making....

Excessive taxes on profits strangles growth and innovation. It gives the current people at the top an advantage over the people who are trying to become rich. There is no incentive for the next wave of pioneers to try to bring their ideas to market.

 

[Patriotic Voter]

Another stupid question -repealing tax cuts don't hurt the poor.

My question is extremely intelligent. You are still refusing to answer it.

 

[Patriotic Voter]

Here is the problem I see with the argument you are making....

Excessive taxes on profits strangles growth and innovation. It gives the current people at the top an advantage over the people who are trying to become rich. There is no incentive for the next wave of pioneers to try to bring their ideas to market.

Paying your fair share is not excessive taxes in anyone's mind except yours. Fair share means rich people are not eligible for any tax cus based on their earned income. That is not adding new taxes or tax increases.