• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Best predictor of divorce? Age when couples cohabit, study says.

ALiberalModerate

Pragmatist
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Messages
36,151
Reaction score
26,764
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate


Read more here:

Best predictor of divorce? Age when couples cohabit, study says. - CSMonitor.com[/h]I have said this for years. Looks like the latest science agrees.
 
I was 23 and my wife (fiance at the time) was 22 when we moved in together. Guess we're due for a divorce.

Well its just a starter marriage you know... Just kidding. I was just 24 when my wife I got married. We had been shacked up since I was 23. We have been married 14 years, have 3 kids, and are happy.
 
Well I'm 24 and my wife is 32, don't know where the **** that leaves us.
 
Read more here: [/FONT]
Best predictor of divorce? Age when couples cohabit, study says. - CSMonitor.com[/h]I have said this for years. Looks like the latest science agrees.

Your thread title, which I see that you pulled from the CSM article, is misleading. Age is not the "best" nor the "biggest" predictor because this study (which is forthcoming and the only info presented is Press Releases) doesn't compare against other predictors. All the study author did was look at age. If you only look at one variable, then you can't argue that it's the best or biggest predictor of divorce.

I'm looking at the author's summary right now and I've got to think about it for a bit because I'm sensing that there are methodological flaws and I want to work this through in my mind before I say more.
 
After some thought, I do think there are problems with the conclusions of this study. Here is a summary of what the researcher did:

Kuperberg did something new: She compared the relationships using the date of first moving in together. That date, she reasoned, is when a couple really takes on the roles of marriage, regardless of whether they have a legal certificate.

Using this method, she found no link between whether people had cohabited before marriage and their rate of divorce. The turning point in age for picking a life partner seems to be about 23, Kuperberg said.

"That's when people are able to pick a partner who is more compatible," she said. "Maybe they are a little more mature. They're a little set up in the world."

The timing seems to coincide with college graduation, she added. Moving in with someone before both people are set in their career paths and schooling may increase the risk that one decides to take a job in New York while the other wants to go to graduate school in California.​

What I suspect is going on is that there is a class bifurcation going on. College graduates leave college and then begin to live together while those who don't go to college begin living together at an earlier age. Those non-college people bring with them the effects which arise from social class and economics and these effects influence quality of life and marriage and divorce whereas college graduates have a somewhat less rocky road and this, in turn, leads to a more stable married life.

I'd be very surprised if this finding has stronger effect size than that noted for the woman's sexual partner count.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…