• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Best political advertisement, EVER

Damn. Zombies have now reached politics. Whelp the world is going to hell in a hand basket.
Yes indeed it is awesome and correct, too. The opponents of Amendment 4 have ads saying vote it down because it can't be estimated how much it will cost. How the heck can you estimate the cost, or savings, of greater public input into land use decision making? Vote it down because of an impossible standard that is only there because a prior amendment says it has to be included on all amendments, every time? When in this case it is nonsensical and inapplicable?

Goes to show just what frickin' idjits the Chambers of Commerce and developers think Floridians are. YES on 4! Have your say mean more.

Regards from Rosie
Now that I've seen the awesomeness that is this ad . . .

. . . can someone explain to me what the feck Amendment 4 is? :lol:
Top Bottom