- Joined
- Mar 4, 2008
- Messages
- 14,102
- Reaction score
- 3,919
- Location
- New Jersey
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Frank, I think the American people have enough at stake here. No one is teaching a lesson in vain.
If you want to be a pragmatic person, you should live life pragmatically. The presidential candidates know that you can't please everyone. Conviction is one thing, but not participating in an open forum or debate doesn't make me see HRC as a more pragmatic candidate.
BS has said he does not consider himself a leader, but if you look back to what has been accomplished, HRC will try oneupmanship where Bernie can point to a meaningful contribution which directly impacted his constituents. Democrats should be interested in bipartisanship in the long term, inasmuch as Republicans will allow it. By stating that BS policies won't work, HRC has shown that she's very adverse to positive change. BS is not a wishful thinker. Trump is not a wishful thinker. I don't think HRC can win the election by playing hardball and victim at the same time, simply because she's a philanthropist. People don't want to see the President throw money around willy nilly. They don't want someone who's a "gosh darn good person," although that would be a significant benefit to that candidate's accountability. It's not enough to ignore the distaste people have for certain candidates, so what more can the DNC do for this country?
Any voter who feels that for whatever reason...he/she should not vote for Hillary Clinton...that person SHOULD NOT VOTE FOR HER.
If you are a Bernie Sanders supporter and you feel that Hillary or the DNC has not conceded enough to Bernie Sanders to earn a vote for Hillary Clinton...YOU SHOULD NOT VOTE FOR HER.
Whether it is teaching her a lesson...or simply standing on principles...THE PERSON SHOULD NOT VOTE FOR HER.
If enough do not...we will live with he consequences.
I'm agreeing with the people who are saying they cannot vote for her.
Okay?