• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Benghazi and the Banality of Evil

Wehrwolfen

Banned
Joined
May 11, 2013
Messages
2,329
Reaction score
402
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
By Daren Jonescu
August 13, 2013


Is it just me, or is the string of distractions that seem to pop up right on cue every time new light is about to be shed on the Benghazi story getting a little old?

Months late, CNN has gotten around to "breaking" a story that might help to complete the disturbing puzzle for the mainstream public, namely the allegation that Benghazi was the hub of a CIA weapons-running operation. Within hours, this was washed from the headlines by the "chatter" indicating an imminent terror plot that required the United States to close numerous diplomatic facilities. (Hurray, NSA!) And then, within days, the mainstream media was "breaking" the news that the first charges had been laid in connection with the Benghazi attack. (How convenient.)

True to pattern, a mainstream media outlet will get its "honest journalism" points, lifting the lid on the facts just long enough to release a little pressure before the pot explodes, but guaranteeing that by Sunday morning Benghazi will once again have been buried by supposedly more urgent issues.


Read more:
Articles: Benghazi and the Banality of Evil


Disinformation, the use of half truths and outright lies has always been the tool of the Progressive Socialist Left.
 
Is it just me, or is the string of distractions that seem to pop up right on cue every time new light is about to be shed on the Benghazi story getting a little old?[/B]

It's just you.
 
By Daren Jonescu
August 13, 2013


Is it just me, or is the string of distractions that seem to pop up right on cue every time new light is about to be shed on the Benghazi story getting a little old?

Months late, CNN has gotten around to "breaking" a story that might help to complete the disturbing puzzle for the mainstream public, namely the allegation that Benghazi was the hub of a CIA weapons-running operation. Within hours, this was washed from the headlines by the "chatter" indicating an imminent terror plot that required the United States to close numerous diplomatic facilities. (Hurray, NSA!) And then, within days, the mainstream media was "breaking" the news that the first charges had been laid in connection with the Benghazi attack. (How convenient.)

True to pattern, a mainstream media outlet will get its "honest journalism" points, lifting the lid on the facts just long enough to release a little pressure before the pot explodes, but guaranteeing that by Sunday morning Benghazi will once again have been buried by supposedly more urgent issues.


Read more:
Articles: Benghazi and the Banality of Evil


Disinformation, the use of half truths and outright lies has always been the tool of the Progressive Socialist Left.

you might get away with distracting people from seeing the baby elephant in the room but that elephant is getting bigger by the week and before to long it will be impossible to distract the public from seeing the full grown elephant Benghazi is becoming. it is going to sink Obama and Clinton both
 
No It's Wehrwolfen crap.

Thank you for attributing the erudite essay written by Daren Jonescu. However, I have nothing to do with his views other than to post them here. It is also apparent that you only read the clip and not the complete Op-ed.
 
Thank you for attributing the erudite essay written by Daren Jonescu. However, I have nothing to do with his views other than to post them here. It is also apparent that you only read the clip and not the complete Op-ed.

I don't read anything from you anymore to be honest. Your comments are too partisan in nature to be even REMOTELY serious.

I will give you props on upping your post count with toilet bowl partisan crap.
 
Back
Top Bottom