Angel
DP Veteran
- Joined
- May 3, 2017
- Messages
- 18,001
- Reaction score
- 2,910
- Location
- New York City
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Beliefs and Skepticism
Belief - acceptance of an idea as true; the idea so accepted
Skepticism - doubt about the truth of an idea; the doubt itself
The Blind Men and the Elephant
by John Godfrey Saxe (1816-1887)
It was six men of Indostan,
To learning much inclined,
Who went to see the Elephant
(Though all of them were blind),
That each by observation
Might satisfy his mind.
The First approach'd the Elephant,
And happening to fall
Against his broad and sturdy side,
At once began to bawl:
"God bless me! but the Elephant
Is very like a wall!"
The Second, feeling of the tusk,
Cried, -"Ho! what have we here
So very round and smooth and sharp?
To me 'tis mighty clear,
This wonder of an Elephant
Is very like a spear!"
The Third approach'd the animal,
And happening to take
The squirming trunk within his hands,
Thus boldly up and spake:
"I see," -quoth he- "the Elephant
Is very like a snake!"
The Fourth reached out an eager hand,
And felt about the knee:
"What most this wondrous beast is like
Is mighty plain," -quoth he,-
"'Tis clear enough the Elephant
Is very like a tree!"
The Fifth, who chanced to touch the ear,
Said- "E'en the blindest man
Can tell what this resembles most;
Deny the fact who can,
This marvel of an Elephant
Is very like a fan!"
The Sixth no sooner had begun
About the beast to grope,
Then, seizing on the swinging tail
That fell within his scope,
"I see," -quoth he,- "the Elephant
Is very like a rope!"
And so these men of Indostan
Disputed loud and long,
Each in his own opinion
Exceeding stiff and strong,
Though each was partly in the right,
And all were in the wrong!
MORAL,
So, oft in theologic wars
The disputants, I ween,
Tread on in utter ignorance
Of what each other mean;
And prate about an Elephant
Not one of them has seen!
Just so a Seventh stumbles in,
A skeptic, I presume,
And overreaches from behind
In atheistic gloom
Denying what the blind can see
The Elephant in the room
The theme of the classic poem in the new light of the amended verse is that while the skeptic doubts the conclusions of the blind men as to the nature of the beast,
the skeptic misses the very existence of the beast he knows intimately.
Comments?
Questions?
Doubts?
Denials?
Blind Men and the Elephant
John Godfrey Saxe - Poems by the Famous Poet - All Poetry
NB Last stanza composed by Angel Trismegistus.
You could've spared us your post then.There is nothing more to be said.
Here's a photograph of an elephant. Anyone can go to the zoo and be guaranteed to see a real one for themselves.Beliefs and Skepticism
Belief - acceptance of an idea as true; the idea so accepted
Skepticism - doubt about the truth of an idea; the doubt itself
The Blind Men and the Elephant
by John Godfrey Saxe (1816-1887)
....
The theme of the classic poem in the new light of the amended verse is that while the skeptic doubts the conclusions of the blind men as to the nature of the beast,
the skeptic misses the very existence of the beast he knows intimately.
Comments?
Questions?
Doubts?
Denials?
Three replies so far from Internet Skeptics who apparently are unfamiliar with the nature of poetry. Sad.
Three replies so far from Internet Skeptics who apparently are unfamiliar with the nature of poetry. Sad.
Beliefs and Skepticism
Belief - acceptance of an idea as true; the idea so accepted
Skepticism - doubt about the truth of an idea; the doubt itself
The Blind Men and the Elephant
by John Godfrey Saxe (1816-1887)
It was six men of Indostan,
To learning much inclined,
Who went to see the Elephant
(Though all of them were blind),
That each by observation
Might satisfy his mind.
The First approach'd the Elephant,
And happening to fall
Against his broad and sturdy side,
At once began to bawl:
"God bless me! but the Elephant
Is very like a wall!"
The Second, feeling of the tusk,
Cried, -"Ho! what have we here
So very round and smooth and sharp?
To me 'tis mighty clear,
This wonder of an Elephant
Is very like a spear!"
The Third approach'd the animal,
And happening to take
The squirming trunk within his hands,
Thus boldly up and spake:
"I see," -quoth he- "the Elephant
Is very like a snake!"
The Fourth reached out an eager hand,
And felt about the knee:
"What most this wondrous beast is like
Is mighty plain," -quoth he,-
"'Tis clear enough the Elephant
Is very like a tree!"
The Fifth, who chanced to touch the ear,
Said- "E'en the blindest man
Can tell what this resembles most;
Deny the fact who can,
This marvel of an Elephant
Is very like a fan!"
The Sixth no sooner had begun
About the beast to grope,
Then, seizing on the swinging tail
That fell within his scope,
"I see," -quoth he,- "the Elephant
Is very like a rope!"
And so these men of Indostan
Disputed loud and long,
Each in his own opinion
Exceeding stiff and strong,
Though each was partly in the right,
And all were in the wrong!
MORAL,
So, oft in theologic wars
The disputants, I ween,
Tread on in utter ignorance
Of what each other mean;
And prate about an Elephant
Not one of them has seen!
Just so a Seventh stumbles in,
A skeptic, I presume,
And overreaches from behind
In atheistic gloom
Denying what the blind can see
The Elephant in the room
The theme of the classic poem in the new light of the amended verse is that while the skeptic doubts the conclusions of the blind men as to the nature of the beast,
the skeptic misses the very existence of the beast he knows intimately.
Comments?
Questions?
Doubts?
Denials?
Blind Men and the Elephant
John Godfrey Saxe - Poems by the Famous Poet - All Poetry
NB Last stanza composed by Angel Trismegistus.
MORAL,
So, oft in theologic wars
The disputants, I ween,
Tread on in utter ignorance
Of what each other mean;
And prate about an Elephant
Not one of them has seen!
Just so a Seventh stumbles in,
A skeptic, I presume,
And overreaches from behind
In atheistic gloom
Denying what the blind can see
The Elephant in the room
Is this a prose forum?Is this the poetry forum?
Is that what you heard -- a whine? Hmm. Internet Skeptics appear to be acutely sensitive to that tone.It's interesting to me that you ask for:
Comments?
Questions?
Doubts?
Denials?
And then whine when you get them.
First, the God you persist in calling "my" God is everybody's God -- including the atheist's God.More interesting things about this story...
First, although I'm sure that you're again going to try to claim it only applies to your "God", it does not. It could apply to belief in anything.
Second, that's not the moral of how this story was originally used.
"The parable has been used to illustrate a range of truths and fallacies; broadly, the parable implies that one's subjective experience can be true, but that such experience is inherently limited by its failure to account for other truths or a totality of truth. At various times the parable has provided insight into the relativism, opaqueness or inexpressible nature of truth, the behavior of experts in fields of contradicting theories, the need for deeper understanding, and respect for different perspectives on the same object of observation."
It's interesting that you have taken a story who's moral is, at least in part, that we should respect others and their different points of view, and turned it into, "you all are blind" and "the objective truth is what I claim".
Thanks for the post, ataraxia. I'm delighted someone got the humor.That's a pretty funny picture at the end there Angel! :lamo
I would just hate to be the guy standing behind the elephant doing that. That's a pretty sensitive area for the elephant, and one wrong move and.... BAM! If you think a horse can kick hard, you haven't been kicked by an elephant!
No wonder the other one is keeping her distance. Smart girl.
First, the God you persist in calling "my" God is everybody's God -- including the atheist's God.
Second, another unattributed quotation.
Third, You misread my amended version of the poem. I'm saying the blind men see better than the Internet Skeptic.
For the record, I was commenting on comments that showed a startling lack of poetic sensibility.
You failed to produce this phantom stolen proof, and yet you bring it up again. Are you readu now to produce it?No...it's YOUR "God". For example, when you steal from the ancient Greek Philosophers, they weren't making an argument for YOUR "God", but for Zeus and the rest of the Greek pantheon.
Dispute an interpretation of Saxe's poem? Of course not. Do you dispute my interpretation of my amended version of Saxe's poem? Let's hear your dispute.I put in the link... Do you dispute what it says?
The Elephant is "there" in the universe of discourse of the poem.Better to say that people in an insane asylum see better than the Internet Skeptic (btw, I have no trouble believing in the internet). People in an insane asylum often claim to see things that aren't there, too.
Possessing the wherewithal to appreciate and understand poetry."Poetic sensibility"? What exactly do you define that as being?
That we don't believe in fantasies based on a parable?
You failed to produce this phantom stolen proof, and yet you bring it up again. Are you readu now to produce it?
Dispute an interpretation of Saxe's poem? Of course not. Do you dispute my interpretation of my amended version of Saxe's poem? Let's hear your dispute.
The Elephant is "there" in the universe of discourse of the poem.
Possessing the wherewithal to appreciate and understand poetry.
I don't know what you mean here. You alleged that my proof was stolen from the Ancient Greeks, I asked you to produce the proof you attribute to me, and you shrugged and said it doesn't matter. And here you are talking about a stolen proof. What proof are you referring to?You claimed it?
/shrug
...
Er...you really don't get it, do you?
No one has said a word against the poem, itself. People have disputed your contrived moral based on the poem.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?