BBC climate editor whose sister is an Insulate Britain fanatic made false claims on global warming

[PoS]

BBC climate editor made false claims on global warming

The programme Wild Weather, presented by climate editor Justin Rowlatt (pictured), said deaths worldwide were rising due to extreme weather caused by climate change.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Yup. The climate change scam is finally getting exposed for what it is.

(Now watch the climate nuts attempt a shoot the messenger fallacy-as well as engage in other fallacies-without actually refuting the story)

 

[Loulit01]

Climate change is a fact. Facts have no impact on today's conservatives. I'm out.

 

[Mr Person]

Argument from fallacy - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Climate change is a fact. Facts have no impact on today's conservatives. I'm out.

Nevermind the sheer idiocy of claiming AGW is a hoax because the Daily Mail says a TV program said something wrong on a show, then pre-emptively attacking anyone who does not agree with that idiocy of for engaging in a "fallacy".

Oh, God, get this:

The introduction of Wild Weather said 'the death toll is rising around the world and the forecast is that worse is to come'. The ECU said this risked giving the impression the rate of deaths from extreme weather-related events was increasing. In fact, as noted by a recent report from the World Meteorological Organisation, while the number of weather-related disasters – such as floods, storms and drought – has risen in the past 50 years, the number of deaths caused by them has fallen because of improved early warnings and disaster management.​

​

BBC News said 'it accepted the wording in the programme was not as clear as it should have been and a public acknowledgement was put on the BBC's Corrections and Clarifications website before the complaint reached the ECU'.​

Daily Mail says a TV program risked giving the impression that deaths increased when in fact the extreme whether increased, but we just so happened to get better at stopping it from killing anyone.

Risked.

Giving.

The.

Impression.

And extreme weather DID increase, per his own source. That is what the latest horseshit thread is based on.

 

[Taylor]

Blatant lying is never a good persuasion tactic.

 

[Mr Person]

Blatant lying is never a good persuasion tactic.

^^​

And this is why this subforum is such a joke, folks. The deniers just swarm each others' threads making a big show of agreeing, even when they don't have the slightest clue what any particular thread is about.

 

[Taylor]

^^​

And this is why this subforum is such a joke, folks. The deniers just swarm each others' threads making a big show of agreeing, even when they don't have the slightest clue what any particular thread is about.

See Post #4.

 

[Lloyd Christmas]

Oh my god, reads like spaceballs

"MY father’s brother’s nephew’s cousin’s former roommate did something" therefore liberals stupid poopyheads

LOL

 

[Mr Person]

Oh my god, reads like spaceballs

"MY father’s brother’s nephew’s cousin’s former roommate did something" therefore liberals stupid poopyheads

LOL

It really is as lame as that a TV program could have given the impression that deaths rose from extreme whether when in fact it was only the extreme weather that increased, while deaths from it fell because we got better at dealing with weather emergencies.

That's what PoS is trying to use to disprove AGW. It's a lie wrapped in stupid wrapped in holy ****ing derp.

 

[PoS]

Argument from fallacy - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Nevermind the sheer idiocy of claiming AGW is a hoax because the Daily Mail says a TV program said something wrong on a show, then pre-emptively attacking anyone who does not agree with that idiocy of for engaging in a "fallacy".

Oh, God, get this:

The introduction of Wild Weather said 'the death toll is rising around the world and the forecast is that worse is to come'. The ECU said this risked giving the impression the rate of deaths from extreme weather-related events was increasing. In fact, as noted by a recent report from the World Meteorological Organisation, while the number of weather-related disasters – such as floods, storms and drought – has risen in the past 50 years, the number of deaths caused by them has fallen because of improved early warnings and disaster management.​

​

BBC News said 'it accepted the wording in the programme was not as clear as it should have been and a public acknowledgement was put on the BBC's Corrections and Clarifications website before the complaint reached the ECU'.​

Daily Mail says a TV program risked giving the impression that deaths increased when in fact the extreme whether increased, but we just so happened to get better at stopping it from killing anyone.

Risked.

Giving.

The.

Impression.

And extreme weather DID increase, per his own source. That is what the latest horseshit thread is based on.

LOL strawman fallacy as predicted.

Here is the relevant quotes in the article that Mr. P ignored (as usual):

The programme Wild Weather, presented by climate editor Justin Rowlatt, said deaths worldwide were rising due to extreme weather caused by climate change – whereas the opposite is true.

It also claimed Madagascar was on the verge of the first famine caused by climate change – despite other factors being involved.

So yes, the program did lie, and your silly climate nut gaslighting is exposed. Keep up the bad work.

 

[bluesmoke]

LOL strawman fallacy as predicted.

Here is the relevant quotes in the article that Mr. P ignored (as usual):



So yes, the program did lie, and your silly climate nut gaslighting is exposed. Keep up the bad work.

Are you reducing your claim to the program lying, and no longer saying it is proof that AGW is a hoax? Are you refusing to accept the clarification of "the program" and disagree with that clarification?

 

[American]

Climate change is a fact. Facts have no impact on today's conservatives. I'm out.

When debating climate change, it is Anthropogenic Climate Change that we're debating. No one disbelieves that natural climate change occurs. With that in mind, you do not have all the facts, nor is the intensity settled science. What the Left is doing is lots of hyperbole and hand-waving, not to mention their questionable intentions. Using disreputable organizations like the IPCC is the usual route taken. Nothing the UN does is worth the paper it's printed on, like much of anything else the UN does. They are the definition of bloated, pompous bureaucracies. Universities merely answer to their money-masters.

 

[PoS]

Are you reducing your claim to the program lying, and no longer saying it is proof that AGW is a hoax? Are you refusing to accept the clarification of "the program" and disagree with that clarification?

Prove manmade AGW is real. Go on, Im waiting.

 

[Schism]

^^​

And this is why this subforum is such a joke, folks. The deniers just swarm each others' threads making a big show of agreeing, even when they don't have the slightest clue what any particular thread is about.

You just described every Trump-hate thread.

 

[American]

Prove manmade AGW is real. Go on, Im waiting.

One puff out of a volcano, and there goes a hundreds of burning fuel. It's insanity.

 

[HenryChinaski]

Prove manmade AGW is real. Go on, Im waiting.

Start with NASA and go from there..

Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

Vital Signs of the Planet: Global Climate Change and Global Warming. Partial list of leading scientific organizations endorsing human-induced climate change, along with a selection of related resources.

climate.nasa.gov

Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree*: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.

 

[bluesmoke]

Prove manmade AGW is real. Go on, Im waiting.

Feel free to honestly answer the question or refuse and move on.

 

[bluesmoke]

Start with NASA and go from there..

Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

Vital Signs of the Planet: Global Climate Change and Global Warming. Partial list of leading scientific organizations endorsing human-induced climate change, along with a selection of related resources.

climate.nasa.gov

You're honestly responding to a poster who refuses to honestly respond to the pertinent questions asked. Why give info to someone who refuses to give info to legitimate debate question previously asked?

 

[HenryChinaski]

You're honestly responding to a poster who refuses to honestly respond to the pertinent questions asked. Why give info to someone who refuses to give info to legitimate debate question previously asked?

Gotcha thanks. It’d be like trying to have a discussion with a young earth creationist or someone who thinks the moon landings were faked.

 

[bluesmoke]

Gotcha thanks. It’d be like trying to have a discussion with a young earth creationist or someone who thinks the moon landings were faked.

No matter what evidence of fact you produce that refute claims made, or they do not to support their own word, they'll continue to make the same argument.

 

[Steve Case]

BBC climate editor made false claims on global warming

The programme Wild Weather, presented by climate editor Justin Rowlatt (pictured), said deaths worldwide were rising due to extreme weather caused by climate change.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Yup. The climate change scam is finally getting exposed for what it is.

(Now watch the climate nuts attempt a shoot the messenger fallacy-as well as engage in other fallacies-without actually refuting the story)

"Yup. The climate change scam is finally getting exposed for what it is."

That supposedly happened with the so-called "Climategate" email drop November 2009.
A lot of people thought that would be the end of it. It wasn't, and what some no-name babe
in the UK said is going to change things even less.

 

[PoS]

Start with NASA and go from there..

Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

Vital Signs of the Planet: Global Climate Change and Global Warming. Partial list of leading scientific organizations endorsing human-induced climate change, along with a selection of related resources.

climate.nasa.gov

Name the studies and links to them, not some crappy website that shows nothing but propaganda.

Feel free to honestly answer the question or refuse and move on.

I'll honestly answer when you post an honest question.

 

[HenryChinaski]

Name the studies and links to them, not some crappy website that shows nothing but propaganda.

The list of scientific organizations and their positions and links to their studies are in NASA’s link. However as you view NASA as “propaganda”. I’m done. It’d be as productive as talking to Kirk Cameron about the origins of the banana.

 

[PoS]

The list of scientific organizations and their positions and links to their studies are in NASA’s link. However as you view NASA as “propaganda”. I’m done. It’d be as productive as talking to Kirk Cameron about the origins of the banana.

Ah, so its clear that you relaly dont have any proof at all, otherwise you would have surely linked the exact study. Thanks for once again proving that your fake beliefs are all fake.

 

[HenryChinaski]

Ah, so its clear that you relaly dont have any proof at all, otherwise you would have surely linked the exact study. Thanks for once again proving that your fake beliefs are all fake.

I’ve led a horse to water but I’m not gonna try and make ‘em drink. One stop shopping in NASA‘s link.. later Kirk..

 

[PoS]

I’ve led a horse to water but I’m not gonna try and make ‘em drink. One stop shopping in NASA‘s link.. later Kirk..

So still nothing. Have fun with your false religion, Mr. Swaggart.