There we have it folks. Just read Tony's papers and the collapse of WTC7 is solved.:mrgreen:
Well whatever Tonys paper says, is clearly better than the silly 1D models of Bazant, that you guys claim explains the collapses.....hahahahahaha!!
No need for details on CD. Just know "they" did it. Doesn't matter how.
No need for details on WTC 7. Just know "Fires" did it. Doesn't matter how.
You are something of irony master.
You seem to object to any detailed questions.
After scouting through this thread, I've not seen any come from you.
Then came up with some explanation of C4, fire resistance fuses, and arson. Why wouldn't someone want details of such claims?
You know something, you would have a strong point if Tony was in charge of the investigation, but guess what, he's not.
Is this one of your
detailed questions you mentioned up above?
Detailed explanation of C4? It explodes.
Detailed explanation of fire resistant fuse? Do they have to be fire proofed if the explosive and fuse aren't within the vicinity of a fire? Rhetorical question of course! lol
Detailed explanation of arson? Shall we charge the planes with arson.
Really its quite sad to watch you try and attack the CD theory with what you think is logic, when it's nothing more than your objections because you can't mentally accept the possibility there were explosives.
You never answered the question if you have ever went back and changed your first paper or just put out a new explanations?
Have fun at the next AE911T convention. :2wave:
A bit like you guys changing your mind. It was a pancake collapse, no a pile driver collapse, a crush down collapse, no I mean a crush down/crush up collapse, no I mean truss failure collapse, no a tube in a tube collapse......15 years......and you guys still can't decide.....lol
And to be fair to Tony, I don't blame him for not wanting to participate, seeing as you don't have arguments for debate, you argue beliefs.....not evidence and certainly not facts!