- Joined
- Apr 20, 2013
- Messages
- 12,331
- Reaction score
- 1,941
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
So you are saying then, not to arrive at that hypocritical tipping point, that you agree/agreed with the Invasion of Iraq, the use of force? And you agree with "taking military action against them"...all of them?The United States has added Cuba, Libya and Syria to the nations it claims are deliberately seeking to obtain chemical or biological weapons.
The US Under Secretary of State said that the three nations could be grouped with other so-called "rogue states" - Iraq, Iran and North Korea - in actively attempting to develop weapons of mass destruction.
He also warned that the US would take action.
"America is determined to prevent the next wave of terror," he said, referring to the 11 September attacks in Washington and New York that killed up to 3,000 people.
"States that sponsor terror and pursue WMD (weapons of mass destruction) must stop. States that renounce terror and abandon WMD can become part of our effort, but those that do not can expect to become our targets," he said.
Seems now that Syria has used chemical weapons, taking military action against them is U.S. policy.
And you really should identify who exactly you are speaking of, we have had a lot of Secretaries of State...the he I assume is GW?
Last edited: