• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bannon

Why? Is this forum censored now?

Do you want to know what irony is?

Here is what you said in your first post.

Democrats, don't bother commenting on this because I know what you will say and it will be illogical.
 
I said please don't comment if you are going to be illogical and partisan.

Taking a small percent to pay a salary out of money you raised yourself is not the same as robbing a bank. And Bannon didn't take any for himself. And it probably was not stolen from the non-profit anyway.

Looks like a political set up to me.

Where are the links to back up what you have said?
 
I said please don't comment if you are going to be illogical and partisan.

Taking a small percent to pay a salary out of money you raised yourself is not the same as robbing a bank. And Bannon didn't take any for himself. And it probably was not stolen from the non-profit anyway.

Looks like a political set up to me.


What’s the old saw? There’s a lot of truth in jokes?

Steve Bannon jokes about stealing 'Build the Wall' money to buy a yacht in viral clip
 
Bannon didn't take any money for himself. I don't know the reason that other guy was paid such a big salary. I don't know if the money they paid him was actually stolen from the fund or just passed through. I haven't read everything about it yet.

I suspect that most of us don't have enough details to make more than a guess but when a guy is arrested for a crime, I would hope it's based on evidence and not some political bias. Especially since I find it unlikely that AG Barr hasn't followed this investigation.
 
It seems like he didn't. And if he did why would that be so horrible. This looks political to me.

You mean if he defalcated funds from a charitable cause raised to help build a border wall, but then laundered the money, and paid himself with it through some backdoor means? I do not know how you define "horrible," Good4Nothin. It's not as though he is stealing Social Security money from some impoverished old ladies. But it is certainly criminal and he should be charged.

Now, if you mean that this looks "political" in that it is selective enforcement of the law and that other people engage in just as bad if not worse fraud through charitable causes you may very well be right. However, one thief saying "Hey, there are worse thieves in my neighborhood, why are you picking on me??" does not fly. He is still a thief.

Certainly if I tried to enrich myself through some cockamamie scheme like this, I would almost certainly be arrested and deservedly charged with felony fraud.
 
Last edited:
Why? Is this forum censored now?

Of course not.

My point, you are making statement of opinion that you want others to take as fact. Noted you provide no links to documents/sites to back up what you say.

We all might was play the "what if game". If I posted, "Bannon is guilty of all charges", would you not expect links to something that backs it up? Without them it is an opinion.
 
Fear not G4N, trump will pardon Bannon no matter what he's guilty of doing.
 
You mean if he defalcated funds from a charitable cause raised to help build a border wall, but then laundered the money, and paid himself with it? I do not know how you define "horrible," Good4Nothin. It's not as though he is stealing from some impoverished old lady's Social Security money. But it is certainly criminal and he should be charged.

Now, if you mean that this looks "political" in that it is selective enforcement of the law and that other people engage in just as bad if not worse fraud through charitable causes you may very well be right. However, one thief saying "Hey, there are worse thieves in my neighborhood, why are you picking on me??" does not fly. He is still a thief.

He didn't pay himself. And he would have to be a dope to commit fraud when he has so many enemies, and when the Democrats are desperate to win the election.

So my guess is, this is political BS like Russiagate.
 
I suddenly just realized I was participating in a troll bait thread. I will leave now.
 
He didn't pay himself. And he would have to be a dope to commit fraud when he has so many enemies, and when the Democrats are desperate to win the election.

So my guess is, this is political BS like Russiagate.

Maybe. The truth will out.
 
He didn't pay himself. And he would have to be a dope to commit fraud when he has so many enemies, and when the Democrats are desperate to win the election.

So my guess is, this is political BS like Russiagate.

Russiagate turned out to be true. The Russians did interfere with our election on Trump's behalf. They're doing it again. Whether or not Trump conspired with the Russians doesn't change those facts.
 
He didn't pay himself. And he would have to be a dope to commit fraud when he has so many enemies, and when the Democrats are desperate to win the election.

So my guess is, this is political BS like Russiagate.

Political "BS" done by a Trump appointed federal attorney. :lol:

If you did 2 seconds of research, you wouldn't "guess" so much.
 
Russiagate turned out to be true. The Russians did interfere with our election on Trump's behalf. They're doing it again. Whether or not Trump conspired with the Russians doesn't change those facts.

CRAAAZZZZY. If Trump had nothing to do with it, then Russiagate is NOT TRUE.
 
I still have to investigate further, but it looks to me like someone was out to get Bannon. The money used for personal expenses was a tiny percent of what they raised. And Bannon didn't take any of that money, it was paid as a salary to another guy. And it was paid "through" the non-profit, not from the non-profit.

I don't know the whole story yet, but so far it seems obvious that Bannon didn't steal any money for himself, and might not have stolen any at all. Just passed it through, or laundered it. Ok, a crime but maybe not a big deal at all.

I still don't understand why Bannon would have taken a chance by committing any kind of a crime, considering how many people hate him and want him in jail. Maybe he really did not think he was doing anything terrible, because maybe he wasn't.

Democrats, don't bother commenting on this because I know what you will say and it will be illogical.

Funny how Trump is the only person that all of reality conspires to victimize.
 
He didn't pay himself. And he would have to be a dope to commit fraud when he has so many enemies, and when the Democrats are desperate to win the election.

So my guess is, this is political BS like Russiagate.

Have you actually read the indictment or are you getting this from talk radio?

Screen Shot 2020-08-21 at 12.36.58 PM.jpg

Bannon received over $1,000,000 from We Build the Wall and kept a substantial portion of that money for HIMSELF...

Page 15 of the actual indictment...

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/press-release/file/1306611/download
 
I suddenly just realized I was participating in a troll bait thread. I will leave now.

Isn’t that called an epiphany?
 
CRAAAZZZZY. If Trump had nothing to do with it, then Russiagate is NOT TRUE.

Trump wants you to believe (and he's happy you do) that the Mueller investigation was just about Trump's part in the interference. Mueller proved Russian interference; he proved Manafort's passing campaign data to Russians; he proved Stone's lying about his Russian connections; he proved the Russians attempted to make contacts within the Trump campaign. I suspect the only thing that saved making the connection between Trump and the Russians was the obstruction Trump caused to the investigation.
 
Have you actually read the indictment or are you getting this from talk radio?

View attachment 67292286

Bannon received over $1,000,000 from We Build the Wall and kept a substantial portion of that money for HIMSELF...

Page 15 of the actual indictment...

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/press-release/file/1306611/download

WITCH HUNT! That's patriotic grift! It's only a reasonable amount, I mean GOP grifters need their luxuries! It's all political FREE BANNON!

What? AOC got a free lunch at the capital cafeteria? Launch at least SIX congressional investigations against this anti 'murican socialist!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Don't you know how this is sposed to work? :roll:
 
Trump wants you to believe (and he's happy you do) that the Mueller investigation was just about Trump's part in the interference. Mueller proved Russian interference; he proved Manafort's passing campaign data to Russians; he proved Stone's lying about his Russian connections; he proved the Russians attempted to make contacts within the Trump campaign. I suspect the only thing that saved making the connection between Trump and the Russians was the obstruction Trump caused to the investigation.

WITCHHUNT! PROCESSD CRIMES!!! NOTHINGBURGER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh the HUMANITY! :roll:
 
They raised 25 million. Hundreds of thousands is a small percent. Bannon did not take any money for himself. And the money was "laundered" not stolen.

That's ok then; money laundering (a federal crime), only carries a maximum sentence 20 years in chokey. I'm cool with that.
 
WITCHHUNT! PROCESSD CRIMES!!! NOTHINGBURGER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh the HUMANITY! :roll:

You left out "No indictment!"

If you're stupid that's a great argument.

ETA: I forgot "Presidential Harassment". Legislation to follow sometime after the election -- like the healthcare plan, the deficit reduction plan, and the erase the debt plan.
 
Too complicated; we're discussing conservatives, remember?

That’s what is interesting... they didn’t even pull off a sophisticated scam.. they didn’t even use encrypted messaging until they were tipped off by bank that they were being investigated..


They thought they were invencible
 
Back
Top Bottom