- Joined
- Mar 7, 2018
- Messages
- 62,525
- Reaction score
- 19,318
- Location
- Lower Mainland of BC
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
More
Did you know that your first attachment is totally useless as it includes neither a source nor column headings?
More
Trump should stop wearing those.Unfortunately, "Freedom of religion" only applies if the Burqa is "religiously mandated" (and that means "in the Qur'an") but it isn't. What the Qur'an mandates is "modesty". The Burqa is only "culturally mandated" and the culture of the United States of America is NOT the same as the culture where it is mandated.
That being said, the only issue that arises is whether or not "The Gummint" should be in the business of mandating what clothing a person is allowed to wear, and, if so, under what specific circumstances and for what specific reasons.
Personally, I find
offensive, but I do not see it as any reason to "ban the Speedo".
A
The US is a Republic. You should have been taught this.
And again, Islamic faith does not allow separation of church and state so Indonesia is not following basic Islamic faith which you would know if you bothered to study it as I have.
But there is no winning when arguing with a true believer such as yourself.
And I prefer not to associate with someone who is supportive of institutional misogyny in the name of “tolerance” and political correctness. I prefer not to associate with someone who doesn’t even acknowledge the Islamic antagonism toward freedom as demonstrated by the files I have sent. I prefer not to associate with someone who doesn’t even acknowledge the surahs I have presented that make it clear what the Koran is suggesting in their form of proselytizing.
I find your attitude disturbing and because you are a total anonymous stranger I will simply wish you the best as I do all contentious people.
Burqa-ban for the simple fact that I would want to see their faces and body language better. That knife came out of nowhere.Banning the Burqa in the US?
The wording of my other poll was rather unclear.
Here now comes a poll with a clearcut wording.
For or against a burqa-ban?
Burqa-ban for the simple fact that I would want to see their faces and body language better. That knife came out of nowhere.
Jackets aren't typically tied to terrorism; burqas are.Going to ban jackets as well then?
How many burqa attacks have there been in the US?Jackets aren't typically tied to terrorism; burqas are.
It has nothing to do with Islam and everything to do with the oppression of women.I'm getting the feeling this has less to do with freedom for women and more to do with dislike of Islam.
It doesn't matter. There have been shitloads all over the globe. Better safe than sorry.How many burqa attacks have there been in the US?
Why would the same concern not be expressed about the way Amish women are forced to dress?It has nothing to do with Islam and everything to do with the oppression of women.
If you were really worried about terrorism in America you'd be on about white men with guns rather than women's clothing.It doesn't matter. There have been shitloads all over the globe. Better safe than sorry.
I'm worried about terrorism across the board. But since this thread is about women in burqas, I'm talking about that potential threat.If you were really worried about terrorism in America you'd be on about white men with guns rather than women's clothing.
Isn't it?Why would the same concern not be expressed about the way Amish women are forced to dress?
You're worried about Muslims across the board.I'm worried about terrorism across the board.
You're worried about anything outside the hivemind.You're worried about Muslims across the board.
Exactly.I can't believe that any person is for the burqa, let alone any woman.
Sounds just as insane as black people supporting slavery.
As I said before:Why would the same concern not be expressed about the way Amish women are forced to dress?
All are examples of modest attire that are traditional and may or may not be enforced by husbands or the community.As I said before:
An Amish bonnet and an Afghan burka are worlds apart.
Even though they have initial letters in common.
That reminds of one time I was with my girlfriend in the store buying some condoms and the clerk said "Do you want a bag with that?" And I said "come on man! She's not that ugly".There are only like 5 women in the US wearing a Burqa.
The Burqa is the thing used in Afghanistan, that covers the face like a bag.
Do you probably mean the Niqab - which more women are wearing ?
Do you really call an Afghan burka "modest"?All are examples of modest attire that are traditional and may or may not be enforced by husbands or the community.
Yes that is the function of the garb.Do you really call an Afghan burka "modest"?
Lots of bad traditions, such as religion generally and its almost universal marginalization of women. Nothing to say about that though right?And if something is "traditional" that must not always be a value in itself.
There are also bad traditions.
The burka is modest?Yes that is the function of the garb.
How is it not modest if no skin whatsoever can be seen? It is the antithesis of the mini skirt.The burka is modest?
Let us agree to disagree.
Why would the same concern not be expressed about the way Amish women are forced to dress?
And if you are Muslim, it's your right to pipe up about whether your traditions have value. The rest of us, not so much.if something is "traditional" that must not always be a value in itself