While ngdawg's post told of something an intimate part of Mississippian history, you troll with your trivial definition of "trivia".
Dude, you're a jerk
Of course I am a Jerk. Boo frickity hoo. Go cry about it. His post was admittedly trivia--trivia is worthless inherently and it warrented pointing out. It was pointed out. In no way did it have any impact on the only valid answer to this thread. THere is one valid answer: mine.
1. No. It's not illegal or unconstitutional to have an amendment passed. It's ****ing absurd to think it would be. Grow at least half a brain, and then dictate answers to me.
And we get knowledge usable in debates how, exactly, if one is not willing to learn about even their OWN history?....ah yes...toss about two words...'strawman' and 'mastubatory', throw in a few insults...there ya go.
Well, no, there is no strawman here, so I don't feel a need to mention it. What is here are:
A. A stupid post topic
B. Stupid answers, except for a few lone individuals, including myself.
Your silly tirade about trival issues means nothing. You admittedly postd triva, trivia is worthless, therefore, don't mention worthless crap in a topic. In no way does your post rebuttle refute anything about the constitutionality of constitutional provisions being legal. This is a stupid thread, and it was based on a stupid question.
What I find really disparaging is that this same person did not know where Zurich was, what the Taj Majal looked like
What the hell are you babbling about you albino baboon? WHo doesn't know about Zurich or Taj Majal?
1. It's spelled Taj Mahal, not Majal.
2. Zurich is spelled with an umlaut, not a U. IE. Zürich