• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

baiting / trolling ?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Slavister

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 8, 2018
Messages
7,413
Reaction score
4,532
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
I'd like to understand baiting / trolling guidelines a little better, as a result of my recent thread being closed.

The section on Forum rules is somewhat vague:

Forum rules said:
3. Baiting/Flaming/Trolling - To bait someone in a general sense is to make a comment with a purposeful intent to coerce some form of response from the individual. In some cases this device can be a useful tool of debate, eliciting responses to highlight a point or reveal an underlying truth concerning someone’s argument. However, in other cases the intent of the bait is less focused on debating.

Going by that definition, my thread was (I thought clearly) meant to "elicit responses to highlight a point or reveal an underlying truth concerning someone’s argument". Is that bad? I made a general point about DP opinions and provided supporting quotes.

(1) How was my thread considered any more of a baiting than say signature lines of many DP posters quoting someone else? Would not such signature quotes constitute much more of a baiting?

(2) Would it be better if I reopened the 13 older threads that I had quoted and quoted each individual in those threads with the same point in each one? It seems like that would be in line with pretty much how all threads are being discussed on this forum. However, I find it odd that this approach would be better than just starting a single thread devoted to the topic. Further, in some threads that would border on hijacking a thread, so I thought separating out a new thread is a better idea.

(3) Whenever possible, I prefer to have threads with links that support my point of view. So if I am arguing that many DP posters expressed a certain opinion, should I not be allowed to provide the quotes for it?

I am genuinely interested in understanding how I violated the forum rules with that thread and how I should have made my point while also proving it at the same time?

Thanks!
 

Kal'Stang

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 10, 2009
Messages
42,744
Reaction score
22,569
Location
Bonners Ferry ID USA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Moderator's Warning:
Thread Closed. Do not open another thread about this again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom