- Joined
- Jul 12, 2018
- Messages
- 15,570
- Reaction score
- 7,979
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Would you care to explain how it is you think Harris can reach down and control the prosecution, defence, the witnesses and the jury? Or is this just something you heard on RW media?
Common sense, my friend.
(De facto) President Harris has no doubt indirectly (in some ways that this nobody would not know) let the big boys (and girls) know that a "Not guilty" verdict would plunge the nation into rioting the likes of which would make last year's outrages look like child's play.
The judge, of course, does not want to be known as the judge who let the ex-cop go free. The jury, of course, are terrified of what would happen to them if they came back with "Not guilty."
Of course, the media would love rioting because (a) it would "sell papers" and (b) it would help to spread the mantra that certain folks are treated so badly in this country.
C'mon. We all know the verdict will be GUILTY! (And yet there will still be rioting -- out of joy, of course!)