• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Back-Alley Abortions or how the market helped women bypass the state


No. I'm arguing that an unregulated free market will provide better quality and lower prices than a government regulated market which restricts competition and often protects bad actors.
 
aociswundumho said:
No. I'm arguing that an unregulated free market will provide better quality and lower prices than a government regulated market which restricts competition and often protects bad actors.
Click to expand...

So is access to a safer abortion not better quality?
 

Hear that, women? The "free market" is going to protect you from dangerous, back-alley abortions. The "free market" is always without error and never gets anything wrong.
 
multivita-man said:
So is access to a safer abortion not better quality?
Click to expand...

I agree a regulated market is safer than a black market, but apparently even black market abortions aren't that dangerous. From the OP:

 
aociswundumho said:
I agree a regulated market is safer than a black market, but apparently even black market abortions aren't that dangerous. From the OP:
Click to expand...

There's no barrier to entry. Of course it's dangerous. Could you find providers who were qualified and less dangerous, sure, but for many others, abortions were/are dangerous.
 
aociswundumho said:
I agree a regulated market is safer than a black market, but apparently even black market abortions aren't that dangerous. From the OP:
Click to expand...
Right, they were safe for people with money and/or connections. Unsafe for the poor who were unable to access those safe options.
 
JasperL said:
Right, they were safe for people with money and/or connections. Unsafe for the poor who were unable to access those safe options.
Click to expand...

Yes, but we have no reason to believe that would be the case in a free market, for reasons previously stated.

Regulation protects bad cops, bad teachers, and bad doctors. See post 23.

Healthcare is probably the most regulated market in the country, yet medical errors are the third leading cause of death in the US:


Note that the source isn't some libertarian think tank.
 
aociswundumho said:
Good. You don't want barriers to entry for anything. It's my life, if I want to hire someone to work on my body, how is that any of your concern?
Click to expand...

That's a pro-choice argument. Did you flip sides all of a sudden?
 
aociswundumho said:
It's my life, if I want to hire someone to work on my body, how is that any of your concern?
Click to expand...

Well, YOU can get your healthcare in an alley, if that's the way you want to go. (pun intended)

But most women would prefer their OB/GYN in a hospital sertting.
 
aociswundumho said:
No. I'm arguing that an unregulated free market will provide better quality and lower prices than a government regulated market which restricts competition and often protects bad actors.
Click to expand...
History has already proven this to be false.

The only way a person can believe this is to completely ignore all of human history and the reality of what life was like during the course of human history.
 
aociswundumho said:
Good. You don't want barriers to entry for anything. It's my life, if I want to hire someone to work on my body, how is that any of your concern?
Click to expand...

It's not just about you. As I said, people in a marketplace make transactional decisions based on transparency. Probably a majority of people want transparency when making their healthcare decisions. That's part of what a regulatory system offers. A medical doctor who graduates from an accredited medical school, passes licensing exams, and completes a residency has some degree of transparent qualification, as opposed to an abortionist someone might find through word of mouth.
 
Phys251 said:
You want Roe reinstated, right?
Click to expand...

IMO, according to the constitution, Dobbs got it right. Abortion is a state issue.

You want abortion to be a federal issue, pro-lifers want it to be a state issue, I want government out of it completely.
 
aociswundumho said:
IMO, according to the constitution, Dobbs got it right. Abortion is a state issue.
Click to expand...

That's not pro-choice. You're contradicting yourself.

aociswundumho said:
You want abortion to be a federal issue, pro-lifers want it to be a state issue, I want government out of it completely.
Click to expand...

Wrong. We pro-choicers want abortion to be a personal issue.
 

Yes, but they don't want restrictions, which is the purpose of regulation.

Consider the construction industry, and how many thousands of people hire unlicensed contractors. This is evidence that people do not want restrictions on who they may hire.

You're starting with the assumption that the state know what's best for everyone. That assumption is false.
 
aociswundumho said:
Good. You don't want barriers to entry for anything. It's my life, if I want to hire someone to work on my body, how is that any of your concern?
Click to expand...
Kind of like how one's abortion choices is anyone else's concern or business? It's not. Neither should there be restrictions on the procedure itself. It's those restrictions which cause women to seek unreputable or unregulated "providers," thus increasing the risk of harm to the woman. Besides, there is simply no rational, logical, or legal based reason to restrict abortion at all.
 
aociswundumho said:
Yes, but they don't want restrictions, which is the purpose of regulation.
Click to expand...

You're just spouting ideologically-driven crap without taking into consideration the context or the perspective. If you're the patient, you don't want restrictions to abortion access; however, you do want restrictions on who can perform abortions.

aociswundumho said:
Consider the construction industry, and how many thousands of people hire unlicensed contractors. This is evidence that people do not want restrictions on who they may hire.
Click to expand...

Consider how many consumers are unaware that their homebuilder has hired unlicensed contractors. Consider how many home buyers are unaware of the fact that repairs stated on a contract disclosure form were performed by unlicensed contractors. Again, transparency.

aociswundumho said:
You're starting with the assumption that the state know what's best for everyone. That assumption is false.
Click to expand...

Regulations and laws are often a response to some sort of problem that the market itself failed to correct. It's often constituents who ask people in a legislative or administrative capacity to change the laws, rules, regulations in order to correct market deficiencies, oversights, etc.
 
aociswundumho said:
No, you want the state to regulate, i.e. control, doctors. That's pro-state, not pro-choice.
Click to expand...

With one side of your mouth, you claim to be pro-choice, but with your other side of your mouth, you say that.

Maybe you are into anarchism.
 

That doesn't address the point. If consumers valued licensing and regulation, then illegal contractors wouldn't have any customers. Yet we observe they have plenty.

multivita-man said:
It's often constituents who ask people in a legislative or administrative capacity to change the laws, rules, regulations in order to correct market deficiencies, oversights, etc.
Click to expand...

Milton Friedman studied occupational licensing intensely, and he never found a single instance where licensure was demanded by the public. In every single case, it was the industry itself that demanded licensing in order to make lower cost competition illegal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.