- Joined
- Sep 16, 2012
- Messages
- 46,433
- Reaction score
- 52,286
- Location
- Tucson, AZ
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
For reference -
Woodward book: Former intel chief Dan Coats believed "Putin had something on Trump" - Axios
The premise -
The clear implication is that Coats had reason to believe that Trump was under Putin's control at least to some extent.
The evidence? -
So Coates had his staff investigate Trump/Russia ties for two and a half years, while he was the ****ing DNI, and didn't find any proof of a relationship but he still believed that Trump was compromised.
Now, as to the media bias -
The article implies that a senior Trump official believed that Trump was compromised by Putin. That's nothing but grist for the propaganda mill.
The actual story that SHOULD be written here is that the DNI spend two and a half years investigating the president he was supposed to be serving! The further story should be that after two and a half years of trying to **** over the guy the American people voted for and elected president he STILL didn't come up with anything! That should be the story.
Heck, if this is the kind of stuff that Trump has been dealing with for damned near 4 years then he's 100% correct in talking about "the swamp" and 100% correct in talking about "fake news".
No American should be OK with the conduct Coates exhibited and no American should be OK with a "media" outlet that so brazenly takes sides in political matters.
Woodward book: Former intel chief Dan Coats believed "Putin had something on Trump" - Axios
The premise -
Former director of national intelligence Dan Coats could not shake his "deep suspicions" that Russian President Vladimir Putin "had something" on President Trump, seeing "no other explanation" for the president's behavior, according to Bob Woodward's new book "Rage," which was obtained by CNN ahead of its publication next week.
The clear implication is that Coats had reason to believe that Trump was under Putin's control at least to some extent.
The evidence? -
Coats was the president's top intelligence official from March 2017 until August 2019. Woodward reports that Coats and his staff examined the intelligence regarding Trump's ties to Russia "as carefully as possible" and that he "still questions the relationship" between Trump and Putin despite the apparent absence of intelligence proof.
So Coates had his staff investigate Trump/Russia ties for two and a half years, while he was the ****ing DNI, and didn't find any proof of a relationship but he still believed that Trump was compromised.
Now, as to the media bias -
The article implies that a senior Trump official believed that Trump was compromised by Putin. That's nothing but grist for the propaganda mill.
The actual story that SHOULD be written here is that the DNI spend two and a half years investigating the president he was supposed to be serving! The further story should be that after two and a half years of trying to **** over the guy the American people voted for and elected president he STILL didn't come up with anything! That should be the story.
Heck, if this is the kind of stuff that Trump has been dealing with for damned near 4 years then he's 100% correct in talking about "the swamp" and 100% correct in talking about "fake news".
No American should be OK with the conduct Coates exhibited and no American should be OK with a "media" outlet that so brazenly takes sides in political matters.