• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Australian Red Cross defends spending 10% of bushfire donations on office costs

JacksinPA

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Dec 3, 2017
Messages
26,290
Reaction score
16,771
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
Australian Red Cross defends spending 10% of bushfire donations on office costs | Australia news | The Guardian

Charity faces criticism from an MP who nearly lost his home in a fire for taking too long to distribute $115m in donations

The Australian Red Cross has defended its decision to spend up to 10% of bushfire donations on administration costs as “essential”, but its past fundraising history shows it has previously promised to put 100% of all money raised directly to a cause.

Facing criticism from the New South Wales Liberal MP for Bega, Andrew Constance, who nearly lost his home in the fires, for taking to taking too long to distribute $115m in donations it has received since July, the charity on Thursday clarified that it would not withhold money for future disasters.
============================================================
I once worked in a factory where one of my co---workers had spent his career doing work for charities. His reply as to which is the most legitimate charity: the Salvation Army.
 
Salvation Army overhead is 18% so in this case they would not be "the most legitimate charity"
 
Back
Top Bottom