- Joined
- Feb 26, 2012
- Messages
- 56,981
- Reaction score
- 27,029
- Location
- Chicago Illinois
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Private
Most of those weapons will probably end up in the hands of ISIS. Very foolish move by the Aussies.
Most of those weapons will probably end up in the hands of ISIS. Very foolish move by the Aussies.
Mornin' Pos. :2wave: More importantly.....is the Aussies willingness to bomb the hell out of these terrorists. Then let the Brits and others keep on with their own. Even Canada wants to get in on the action.
Mornin' Pos. :2wave: More importantly.....is the Aussies willingness to bomb the hell out of these terrorists. Then let the Brits and others keep on with their own. Even Canada wants to get in on the action.
There were more countries than that fighting Al Qaeda and guess what, they are still around. Western military intervention is not the answer.
Not really.....who else has really been fighting Al Qaida in several different countries.
If there isn't any Western military intervention.....the problem will not be handled.
Military interventions invite more attacks against the west and enables more terrorist recruitment so no, its counter-productive.
Military interventions invite more attacks against the west and enables more terrorist recruitment so no, its counter-productive.
The alternative argument is they will end up bringing it to the West anyway.....and in doing so they will use their religion as the excuse.
Bzzt. ISIS only declared war against the US after we bombed them.Successful military interventions decimate the enemy and preclude any possibility of counterattack - hopefully for at least a generation. "Proportional" interventions simply guarantee endless war. No intervention invites our destruction, which is the stated goal of ISIS.
That argument is a myth perpetuated by neocons and warmongers. Almost every terrorist attack can be traced back to a cause due to either a military occupation or support for a regime that has militarily occupied a region in the ME.
Bzzt. ISIS only declared war against the US after we bombed them.
Bzzt. ISIS only declared war against the US after we bombed them.
Really? Huh. Then the stated goal of the Caliphate isn't a world wide thing. Wonderful. They'll win us over with roses, chocolate, and just a couple of beheadings.
That was the old style of thinking.....until there was a Caliphate in place and all different types of people that support it. Now it has to do with some wanting to impose their way of life upon all others. Time is all they need.
Islamists arent commies, they are not after a worldwide empire, not even Bin Laden wanted to conquer the world. You need better sources.
There's a Caliphate in place? Pray tell, which one?
I would go with what the Maps of ISIS.....and what they have under their control and their operations. So that one first.
Islamists arent commies, they are not after a worldwide empire, not even Bin Laden wanted to conquer the world. You need better sources.
ISIS has no government in place or industry. So how are they an all-encompassing Caliphate again?
ISIS has no government in place or industry. So how are they an all-encompassing Caliphate again?
What do you mean they have no government in Place.....they are issuing passports, they have leadership and go thru the Shura council.
So?How Iraq's black market in oil funds ISIS - CNN.com
And? How does that make them an all-encompassing caliphate which threatens the US?
So?
Well you said they had no government.....I never said it made them into anything thats All encompassing. As to their threats.....they have already made them. There, here and anywhere. Is their thought.
10,000 people is an Islamic Caliphate?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?