- Joined
- Apr 18, 2013
- Messages
- 94,262
- Reaction score
- 82,620
- Location
- Barsoom
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Attorneys for Trump accuser E. Jean Carroll ask court to keep DOJ from defending case
I agree with plaintiff's lawyers. There is no valid reason why DoJ lawyers are involved in this civil suit, nor why US taxpayers should pay for defending Donald Trump.
Trump's defamation of Ms. Carroll was not part of his presidential duties.
4/16/21
A federal appeals court should deny the Justice Department's attempt to substitute for former President Donald Trump in a defamation lawsuit brought by former Elle columnist E. Jean Carroll, her attorneys said in a new court filing Friday night. Instead, Carroll urged the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to affirm "Trump did not act within the scope of his employment as President of the United States when he repeatedly, willfully defamed a private citizen to punish and retaliate against her after she revealed that he had sexually assaulted her decades before he took office." Carroll sued the former president for defamation after he accused her of playing politics and lying about an alleged 1990s rape in a dressing room at Bergdorf Goodman. Last October, U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan rejected the Justice Department's bid to replace Trump as the defendant, ruling that his statements about Carroll were not made as part of his official duties and that the legal theory cited by the DOJ does not apply to the president.
"Trump has tried and failed repeatedly to get my lawsuit booted," Carroll said in a statement Friday. "Last fall, he had his Justice Department intervene and try to get it dismissed in federal court. He lost. Then, just a week before President Biden’s inauguration, Trump’s private lawyers and the DOJ joined forces to argue on appeal that when Trump called me a liar who was too ugly to rape, he was somehow being presidential. This is offensive to me." Carroll published a book excerpt in 2019 in which she wrote that Trump raped her in the 1990s. Almost immediately after publication of the excerpt, Trump -- who by then was president -- told the press that Carroll had made up the rape story and he never met her. Carroll sued him in New York State court. At first, the former president defended the case as a private individual. He was represented by his personal lawyers, not by DOJ or other government lawyers. The state court rejected his claim he could not be sued because he was president. It was at that point that the U.S. government inserted itself into the case.
I agree with plaintiff's lawyers. There is no valid reason why DoJ lawyers are involved in this civil suit, nor why US taxpayers should pay for defending Donald Trump.
Trump's defamation of Ms. Carroll was not part of his presidential duties.