- Joined
- Apr 13, 2011
- Messages
- 34,951
- Reaction score
- 16,311
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
–It is revealed that Bill Higgins, the Pennsylvania District Attorney charging a teen with desecration of a Jesus statue for pictures simulating oral sex with the statue, had an affair in his court office and posted porn to Twitter.
Video @:
[/FONT][/COLOR][h=1]Attorney Charging Teen with Desecration of Jesus Statue Had Affair in Office, Posted Porn Online[/h]
Remember that teen that pissed off a lot of lot of people because he posted a "bad image" with Jesus? Well it seems that the DA might of been a bit naughty too.... :lamo:lamo:lamo
Video @:
[/FONT][/COLOR][h=1]Attorney Charging Teen with Desecration of Jesus Statue Had Affair in Office, Posted Porn Online[/h]
Remember that teen that pissed off a lot of lot of people because he posted a "bad image" with Jesus? Well it seems that the DA might of been a bit naughty too.... :lamo:lamo:lamo
While I think that charging the kid was really stupid, he did charge him based on a law on the books since the early 1970s, and he is the District Attorney, so whatever he did outside of his office isn't relevant to his job of enforcing the laws. Having an affair and being interested in porn aren't illegal acts. I think the voters who elected him expect him to do his job and not recuse himself from every potential law violation involving anything even remotely sexual because of his own transgressions.
That said, I think what the kid did was stupid, but kids can be stupid, and I hope this one doesn't have to pay a price for his stupidity.
I agree with you again. This is getting weird. STOP MAKING SENSE!
If he was having an affair with a Jesus statue, it might be an issue. Otherwise, it's really not connected at all.
While I think that charging the kid was really stupid, he did charge him based on a law on the books since the early 1970s, and he is the District Attorney, so whatever he did outside of his office isn't relevant to his job of enforcing the laws. Having an affair and being interested in porn aren't illegal acts. I think the voters who elected him expect him to do his job and not recuse himself from every potential law violation involving anything even remotely sexual because of his own transgressions.
That said, I think what the kid did was stupid, but kids can be stupid, and I hope this one doesn't have to pay a price for his stupidity.
What law did the teen break?
While I think that charging the kid was really stupid, he did charge him based on a law on the books since the early 1970s, and he is the District Attorney, so whatever he did outside of his office isn't relevant to his job of enforcing the laws. Having an affair and being interested in porn aren't illegal acts. I think the voters who elected him expect him to do his job and not recuse himself from every potential law violation involving anything even remotely sexual because of his own transgressions.
That said, I think what the kid did was stupid, but kids can be stupid, and I hope this one doesn't have to pay a price for his stupidity.
Yes, but this falls under the same catagory as laws that are no longer enforced but still on the books. Such as Texas there is still a law that says "It is illegal to take more than three sips of beer at a time while standing."
I really do hope this gets either thrown out or appealed. I believe it will be found this law is Unconstitutional.
I'm not sure why you said "Yes, but...." as if said something you disagreed with? Not enough coffee today for me.
I agree, it's a dumb law and I also hope the kid gets off. He's a dopey kid, but mine are pretty dopey too sometimes and I don't want them jailed for it. Some old laws are just nutty (like this one).
I think the OP was way off the mark. Like Rocket said, unless the DA was having an affair with a Jesus statue, there is no connection.
What law did the teen break?
Yes, there is no connection between what the attorney did LEGALLY versus this case. I just think its pretty silly to charge this teen with this and unless I'm wrong it is within the power of the district attorney to NOT do this. I don't think there are tons of Texas DA pursuing Men taking more than three sips of beer at a time while standing up even though it's still on the books.
Interestingly as far as I can tell adultery was a crime in Pa until recently - last few decades. It was a crime pretty much everywhere in the US until the middle of the last century.
One that I'd say has a better than even chance of being unconstitutional if it was ever challenged.
Video @:
[/FONT][/COLOR][h=1]Attorney Charging Teen with Desecration of Jesus Statue Had Affair in Office, Posted Porn Online[/h]
Remember that teen that pissed off a lot of lot of people because he posted a "bad image" with Jesus? Well it seems that the DA might of been a bit naughty too.... :lamo:lamo:lamo
You would hope, at least, that the State should not be determining what is and is not blasphemy. Unless it's the Islamic State.
Why does it really matter? the guy can't win the case.
I find this kid disgusting but at the same time he does have First Amendment rights - something I highly doubt those opposed to my ideas would even think to acknowledging for me....
It almost seems as if you're proud of this young deviant....
Disorderly Conduct and or a lewd act in public would certainly stick....
Both are BS charges anyways but what the kid did was no different than vandalism.
The kid doesn't belong in jail - he should be scolded tho.
Video @:
[/FONT][/COLOR][h=1]Attorney Charging Teen with Desecration of Jesus Statue Had Affair in Office, Posted Porn Online[/h]
Remember that teen that pissed off a lot of lot of people because he posted a "bad image" with Jesus? Well it seems that the DA might of been a bit naughty too.... :lamo:lamo:lamo
Those religious holy roller types always have skeletons in the closet, this is no surprise at all.
Just to point out, the statue was not damaged in any way. Therefore, it is different than vandalism.. there is monetary loss in vandalism.
Just to point out, the statue was not damaged in any way. Therefore, it is different than vandalism.. there is monetary loss in vandalism.
I don't actually approve of this kind of character attack. We should evaluate what the kid did entirely on its own, without caring about this DA. Of course, there's no way that what the kid did should be against any law, but that should be the issue, not the DA's private life.
That is definitely true. More often than the religious population at large would like to admit.
Do you have some evidence that the DA is a religious holy roller type?Those religious holy roller types always have skeletons in the closet, this is no surprise at all.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?