- Joined
- Mar 17, 2016
- Messages
- 14,235
- Reaction score
- 1,453
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Yeah, looks like a lone wolf or mental illness to me. Sort of like the suspect in the Orlando massacre.
Islam is now a mental illness?
Yeah, looks like a lone wolf or mental illness to me. Sort of like the suspect in the Orlando massacre.
Islam is now a mental illness?
Those that blame an entire religion for all their problems are the ones with mental illness.
What do you think is the inspiration? What else could it be but Islamic doctrine? There is no difference between what is sanctioned and the acts of a crazy evil person emulating his prophet. This is what is taught and therefore the religion is to blame. There is no way around it.
Those that blame an entire religion for all their problems are the ones with mental illness.
Simple question, is Tunisia largely sunni or shia?
http://www.debatepolitics.com/europ...ls-according-top-eu-off-4.html#post1065265382
I know of no one who blames Islam for all their problems. Do you PoS? The point is that Islam is an absolutist, intolerant and fanatic philosophy, incompatible with civilised values. The Koran and the Hadith abound with incitements to violence. It is unsurprising that some Muslims act on them.
Well, your statement certainly seems to be justifying that we keep our heads in the sand on what, without doubt to the sane observer, is happening all over the planet. Ignoring the problem is not solving the problem.It is like any ideology. You can justify anything.
What do you think is the inspiration? What else could it be but Islamic doctrine? There is no difference between what is sanctioned and the acts of a crazy evil person emulating his prophet. This is what is taught and therefore the religion is to blame. There is no way around it.
Thanks for proving my point. :dohI know of no one who blames Islam for all their problems. Do you PoS? The point is that Islam is an absolutist, intolerant and fanatic philosophy, incompatible with civilised values. The Koran and the Hadith abound with incitements to violence. It is unsurprising that some Muslims act on them.
Well, your statement certainly seems to be justifying that we keep our heads in the sand on what, without doubt to the sane observer, is happening all over the planet. Ignoring the problem is not solving the problem.
The suspect ate pork and wasn't considered a radical.
Well its official then, no good Muslim terrorist who kills for Allah would eat pork. :doh
Wonderful strawman you have since the suspect wasn't even religious. Got any more hot air to exhale?
What we know about Nice attacker Mohamed Lahouaiej Bouhlel - NY Daily News
Bouhlel was not religious. He did not go to the mosque. He did not pray. He did not observe Ramadan,” his wife’s cousin Walid Hamou told MailOnline. “He drank alcohol, ate pork and took drugs. This is all forbidden under Islam.
Actually, I am not sure that is proven, that it is fine of itself. Not in the stage it is in now, just like other religions in the past that were in an Imperialistic phase.Nope. Doesn't solve the problem. It is more the order of thinking that it structures. There is no point in being pissed off at Islam or decrying it. It's fine of itself.
The same thing with blacks or women. Racism and misogyny are (but for the cases of a few idiots) no real problem in our society. The structure of our laws and society are a problem. And that is what needs thinking about.
Actually, I am not sure that is proven, that it is fine of itself. Not in the stage it is in now, just like other religions in the past that were in an Imperialistic phase.
With over a billion adherents worldwide, even the small percentages that may be radicalized and the larger percentages that do not seem to have distaste, or at least show in any particular manner a strong outcry against those that practice their radicalism often to the permanent disadvantage of innocent civilians... this really is not so fine of itself.
I don't think either of those were religions that I am aware of?You mean like the case of the Franks dominating the Saxons With barbarian force? Or were you thinking of the modern Belgians in the Kongo or Germans in Warsaw? Everyone is mean, when hungry and lean.
Best not to mind him, he distorts what others say at the first given opportunity.Those that blame an entire religion for all their problems are the ones with mental illness.
"ISIL claimed responsibility Saturday for the attack. An Islamic State-run media outlet says the man who drove his truck into a crowd in the French coastal city of Nice is a "soldier" of the group."Wonderful strawman you have since the suspect wasn't even religious. Got any more hot air to exhale?
What we know about Nice attacker Mohamed Lahouaiej Bouhlel - NY Daily News
Unlike you who distorts at almost EVERY opportunity.Best not to mind him, he distorts what others say at the first given opportunity.
The Frank-Saxon conflict was about Christianity against paganism. But also about imperial power vs. rebellion against its establishment.I don't think either of those were religions that I am aware of?
The Frank religion, didn't it combine with beans, that turned out to be a bit of stinker. And I am pretty sure sure Belgium, even when it didn't have a true government there for a while, was not a religion but a country, yano?
Give an exampleUnlike you who distorts at almost EVERY opportunity.
Yes, it was originally a response to Saxon initiated incursion [see the Saxon attack on Deventer] and so was not, as you quickly admit, all about religious Imperialism on Charlemagne's part. The Franks are what became the French, which had power structures divided between those of governance and religion.The Frank-Saxon conflict was about Christianity against paganism. But also about imperial power vs. rebellion against its establishment.
Charlemagne executed some 4,500 Saxons on the same day. The Saxon wars were not solved until all Saxons had (been)converted to Christianity
By force.
If you so desire you can go back and look up where we crossed words earlier, for example, on violence going on in Europe. You were ONLY concerned with acts that seemed to affect you, I believe you had a friend die in one. Remember?Give an example