• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

At least 6 people were killed in a shooting at a Walmart in Virginia, officials say. The shooter is also dead

rahl said:
saw it. You remain objectively incorrect, and have been proven so.
Click to expand...
You forgot to stomp, not that it would help with your alternate reality.
Why not spend the time on a remedial English language course?
 
blue scorpion said:
You forgot to stomp, not that it would help with your alternate reality.
Click to expand...
I don't need to stomp. You are objectively incorrect, and have been proven so. There is a written record of it in this thread.
blue scorpion said:
Why not spend the time on a remedial English language course?
Click to expand...
Why? I've schooled you sufficiently lol.
 
blue scorpion said:
Which you clearly are unable to understand.
Click to expand...
Of course I do. Either of these claims (which mean exactly the same thing) "guns are designed to kill" or "the primary purpose of guns is to kill" is objectively false. And it has been proven so. The existence of a single firearm that's purpose is NOT to kill, refutes the statement.
blue scorpion said:
In your delusion.
Click to expand...
Right here in reality, and you are fully aware of that.
 
rahl said:
Of course I do. Either of these claims (which mean exactly the same thing) "guns are designed to kill" or "the primary purpose of guns is to kill" is objectively false.
Click to expand...
Still haven't asked someone with basic language skills eh?
rahl said:
The existence of a single firearm that's purpose is NOT to kill, refutes the statement.
Click to expand...
Actually it does not. One exception does not negate the general rule. Don't you know anything?
rahl said:
Right here in reality
Click to expand...
Your alternate reality.
rahl said:
and you are fully aware of that.
Click to expand...
Of your failures, yes just like everyone reading your posts.
 
blue scorpion said:
Still haven't asked someone with basic language skills eh?
Click to expand...
I've schooled you on them.
blue scorpion said:
Actually it does not.
Click to expand...
Of course it does.
blue scorpion said:
One exception does not negate the general rule. Don't you know anything?
Click to expand...
Of course it does. You made a categorical claim. A single example refutes that claim. Had you said, SOME guns primary purpose is to kill, you wouldn't look so foolish.
blue scorpion said:
Your alternate reality.
Click to expand...
Nope, right here on the forum.
blue scorpion said:
Of your failures, yes just like everyone reading your posts.
Click to expand...
You remain, objectively incorrect. Sorry.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom