And? She nor Trump did anything illegal.
Which pedophile rapist? And she defends her man.. oh the horror... at least she has the balls to take a stand, unlike Trump who lies and pleads the 5th when asked about his sexual assaults, sexism and possible pedophilia.
Eh? context would be nice. Now with Trump we have cases going back to the 70s not to mention "his African American friend" comment... among many other issues on race.
If you have followed any of my posts from the past, you would know that I would prefer to burn down this government.
Assange is a leach, a liar, and a women abuser.
How will we know the emails are legit, and untampered & unedited?
Assange needs to be taken out.
He's just another white speck on a chicken turd.
Yeah, but with a chain of custody that goes through a fugitive from investigation & currently under Ecuadorian asylum, and is prefaced by God only knows what other scurrilous individuals and/or nation states, do you really believe those emails could survive trial?That's what the Independent Council law was set up for, and also why the US Constitution gives Impeachment powers to the Congress. There's nothing restricting the impeachment and conviction of a President or Secretary of State, AFTER he or she has left office - although that would be very ugly politically.
However, we don't know what, if anything, this document dump will actually show. It may just be a lengthy discussion about toe jam, jock itch, and airplane talks about grandchildren.
How do you know?I'm sure we'll know more once it gets released. As far as right now, all we have is his past practice and he has nor provided tampered or false materials before.
Yeah, but with a chain of custody that goes through a fugitive from investigation & currently under Ecuadorian asylum, and is prefaced by God only knows what other scurrilous individuals and/or nation states, do you really believe those emails could survive trial?
How do you know?
I wonder what it would take for these emails to make any kind of diffference? I think it will just confirm what all of the anti-Hillary folks already know( lack of charcter,fundamentally dishonest) .
The Hillary supporters will just say. " That's bad but all politicians lie,but , Trump called somebody fat!!!"
And? She nor Trump did anything illegal. That was never the point of the Trump tax issue and you know it. It is all about how rich he is, the charities he has given too and of course his credibility over all.
Which pedophile rapist? And she defends her man.. oh the horror... at least she has the balls to take a stand, unlike Trump who lies and pleads the 5th when asked about his sexual assaults, sexism and possible pedophilia.
Eh? context would be nice. Now with Trump we have cases going back to the 70s not to mention "his African American friend" comment... among many other issues on race.
Thank you.You have a point.
The public, well, the rational public, has seen how Hillary Clinton's machine has fabricated, deceived, and lied regarding Trumps comments, etc., so it's possible the same could be done with whatever WikiLeaks could be planning to release.
It's hard to believe the information we as voters are asked to absorb would come from a return of the height of yellow journalism perfected by William Randolph Hearst.
Thank you.
Exactly!
The amount of dis-information overload we suffer is unbelievable. I believe that's why the political process has become so crazy!
If we allow these outside sources to influence our political process, I can easily see the campaigns surreptitiously establishing their own counter-leakers! :doh
Up until recently we were able to function in non-internet real-life, and were warned to not interact with or believe the crazy stuff on the internet. Now, the internet *is used* for real-life, including some electronic voting machines in several states!
I just feel it's becoming crazier, and rather than being better informed, we are becoming more easily mis-informed!
Hey, fair enough - I like your post.Well, perhaps it's the eternal optimist in me, but I would suggest there are some who are easily miss-informed, while most remain skeptical of the deluge of BS floated out by the hour.
The challenge is getting to the truth without becoming indifferent to the whole thing.
How do you know?
Like you, I have no proof at hand.It's never been refuted as such. For example, the DNC emails weren't criticized for being fake or tampered with, just a claim from the Clinton campaign that Russia did it. No one has claimed any of Snowden's files were fake or doctored.
But, sure, you're more than free to give me an example where it was demonstrated he did so.
Like you, I have no proof at hand.
But without review of all the emails against known data, it cannot be said they're authentic or accurate.
They're accuracy is unknown.
Assange needs to be taken out.
He's just another white speck on a chicken turd.
:lamo*their
I win.
Fair enough. I'm not going to go on banging against you on all four of your new posts.I have no concerns about the accuracy. Again, that's never been refuted by anyone, to include those who were involved. Debbie didn't resign over fake emails. They were the real deal.
:lamo
Alright, I'll concede this point! :mrgreen:
So basically, I look at this stuff as an interesting diversion, but I'm not putting serious stock in it. I demand a somewhat higher evidentiary bar, and have no problem with that.
:lamo
Alright, I'll concede this point! :mrgreen:
Fair enough. I'm not going to go on banging against you on all four of your new posts.
I disagree here, in technicality terms.
But some of your points are reasonable, even if unproven.
However, regardless of past appearances (which I don't necessarily trust), I do not see that as a predictor of the future.
So basically, I look at this stuff as an interesting diversion, but I'm not putting serious stock in it. I demand a somewhat higher evidentiary bar, and have no problem with that.
Correct, you can't silence it, but you can ignore it like the FBI and DOJ have done and you discredit it like Hillary, Bill, and their minions have done for ~30 years.
Julian Assange canceled plans to do a balcony announcement Tuesday due to " specific " safety concerns
The anticipated anouncment will be made during a Belrin press conference tomorrow
https://www.google.com/amp/www.foxn...ent.amp.html?client=ms-android-hms-tmobile-us
I bet the NYTs will refuse to post any of these newly released e-mails. You know, because they were obtained " illegally "
She has? Oh what tax issues? What sexism issues? And racism? come on... Let me guess you are a Trumpman all the way, regardless if he has lusted for his own daughter, been screwing around and been clearly racist for decades.. not to mention a massive con man. Yea Clinton is sooo much worse.. she has lived in a freaking glass bubble for 30+ years and the GOP has not been able to nail anything to her.
This level of partisan blindness is truly astonishing.
As a practical matter it's nearly certain that whatever is released will be true and accurate. That's because it's checkable. What's not certain is whether the release would be the whole truth.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?