• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ashli Babbitt, justified shooting based on legality? Yes or no

Ashli Babbitt, justified shooting based on legality? Yes or no

  • Total voters
    101
Hamish Howl said:
Yes, a howling mob screaming "hang Pence" or whatnot is no threat at all.
Click to expand...
We're going to start shooting people because other people a half mile away from them are screaming?
 
Taylor said:
We're going to start shooting people because other people a half mile away from them are screaming?
Click to expand...

They could have shot every person that stormed the capitol building and you wouldn't hear any complaints from me.

Babbit was the first one through the window, so she won the prize.
 
Fledermaus said:
Someone was breaching the final barricade between violent rioters and Congress people.

Doesn't get more threatening or imminent than that....
Click to expand...

Right... the only thing worse than having someone shoot at you or a guy come at you with a knife or someone brutally beating a child to death is an unarmed woman standing in a windowsill. Nothing is more threatening than that. :rolleyes:
 
Taylor said:
We're going to start shooting people because other people a half mile away from them are screaming?
Click to expand...
Who said that? oh thats right . . nobody lol
 
Hamish Howl said:
They could have shot every person that stormed the capitol building and you wouldn't hear any complaints from me.
Click to expand...
Which is why we have rule of law and not lynch mobs.
 
Taylor said:
Right... the only thing worse than having someone shoot at you or a guy come at you with a knife or someone brutally beating a child to death is an unarmed woman standing in a windowsill. Nothing is more threatening than that. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

None of that has anything to do with the idiot bitch breaching security....

Now does it?
 
Hamish Howl said:
They could have shot every person that stormed the capitol building and you wouldn't hear any complaints from me.

Babbit was the first one through the window, so she won the prize.
Click to expand...

Well it is true that there was justifiable means ate just storming the capitol, then again at the first breach. . . its a miracle that only one moron got herself shot at the second breach.
 
Taylor said:
Right... the only thing worse than having someone shoot at you or a guy come at you with a knife or someone brutally beating a child to death is an unarmed woman standing in a windowsill. Nothing is more threatening than that. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

you must be in the wrong thread, we are talking about tha terrorist moron ashli Babbit that stormed the capitol with a mob or other terrorist, breached it, stormed inside and then breached a barricade . . . None of those things above have anything to do with jan 6th

you might want to research this topic because your post look very silly right now. Theres lots of video and reports of this topic please read and watch them LMAO
 
Taylor said:
Which is why we have rule of law and not lynch mobs.
Click to expand...
this post makes no sense at all, this moron got herself killed based on rule of law LMAO
 
Fledermaus said:
None of that has anything to do with the idiot bitch breaching security....

Now does it?
Click to expand...
You're the one that said "Doesn't get more threatening or imminent" than a woman standing in a windowsill.
 
Taylor said:
You're the one that said "Doesn't get more threatening or imminent" than a woman standing in a windowsill.
Click to expand...

So what you're saying is, a rampaging mob isn't a threat if the person in front is a woman.

Am I reading you correctly?
 
Taylor said:
You're the one that said "Doesn't get more threatening or imminent" than a woman standing in a windowsill.
Click to expand...
Nope, nobody said that retarded statement. If you disagree Qoute somebody saying that . . we'll wait , but you wont cause you cant 😁 🍿
 
AGENT J said:
you must be in the wrong thread, we are talking about tha terrorist moron ashli Babbit that stormed the capitol with a mob or other terrorist, breached it, stormed inside and then breached a barricade . . . None of those things above have anything to do with jan 6th

you might want to research this topic because your post look very silly right now. Theres lots of video and reports of this topic please read and watch them LMAO
Click to expand...
He's the one that thinks there's nothing more threatening or imminent than an unarmed woman standing in the windowsill of barricaded door - so that includes the things I listed.
 
Hamish Howl said:
So what you're saying is, a rampaging mob isn't a threat if the person in front is a woman.

Am I reading you correctly?
Click to expand...
Now you want to shoot people for the crime of "rampaging"?
 
AGENT J said:
Nope, nobody said that retarded statement. If you disagree Qoute somebody saying that . . we'll wait , but you wont cause you cant 😁 🍿
Click to expand...
I'm sorry you have such difficulty following simple conversations.
 
Taylor said:
He's the one that thinks there's nothing more threatening or imminent than an unarmed woman standing in the windowsill of barricaded door - so that includes the things I listed.
Click to expand...
once again, nobody made that retarded claim, hence why you aren't quoting anybody saying that. Its something that your posts got caught making up again and now multiple people are pointing out that lie and mocking it for the nonsense it is.

DO you have something on topic that somebody actually said that supports your false claims this was a bad shoot? . . like anything factual or logical, please provide now, thanks!
 
Taylor said:
I'm sorry you have such difficulty following simple conversations.
Click to expand...
Translation: you cant quote anybody saying that moronic statement LMAO that's what I thought!
Please lLet us know when you can, thanks
 
AmNat said:
The government is allowing it to go unpunished, ergo it's legal.

I do think it's unfortunate that an unarmed woman was gunned down for the crime of protesting against her government.
Click to expand...

Too bad it was all based on a lie. In theory, Trump is responsible for her death.
 
Taylor said:
I'm sure the powers that be in place like China and North Korea would agree.
Click to expand...

So your opinion is that if one side loses an election, it's okay for that side to attack congress and attempt to lynch the vice president?

Okay.
 
Hamish Howl said:
So your opinion is that if one side loses an election, it's okay for that side to attack congress and attempt to lynch the vice president?

Okay.
Click to expand...
Of course not. Fortunately, neither of those two things happened. If there were an imminent threat to anyone I would support a use of force. In this instance, there was no imminent threat.
 
Taylor said:
I'm sure the powers that be in countries like China and North Korea would agree.
Click to expand...
COrrect, most countries take lethal action against terrorist and storing a countries capitol building or alike . . . just basic common sense . . i mean who doesnt know that you can win a darwin award in the shape of a bullet for storming and attacking a nations capitol 🤷‍♂️ 😂
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom