• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

As The Pressure Gets To Trump, He Says The Quiet Part Out Loud

The left using lying propaganda against their political opponents. You are purposefully lying.

You can't explain the context, can you? You're just lashing out because you can't just admit that right-wing authoritarianism isn't a deal-breaker for you.
 
Right so if he needs their vote now and not later that basically means he isn't leaving.
No, I didn't get that from the context of his speech at all.

See the problem is he flirts with these ideas of dictatorship so the throught that you and fletch want to cut him some slack in a sense isn't gonna happen.
I agree there are other comments that steer in this direction, but my point is those are the better ones to attack than trying to frame this one as such when that wasn't the implication. I'm all about taking Trump to task, but accurately. Having listened to the speech in question, someone framing the quote we're discussing in the context of it implying dictatorship just doesn't cut it. Critiquing an opponent should be accurate, because the moment it's out of context or flat out incorrect, those critiquing lose credibility.

It's zero tolerance with trump even if he may not have directly said it.
He didn't even imply it. This is an example of someone taking a quote and framing it as something it isn't. I just don't think that's necessary given the loads of idiocy available to take Trump to task. My hope is Harris and other groups don't resort to this kind of tactic, because it's easy to call out and make them look dishonest. It's not going to be very convincing for those on the fence if the critiques against Trump are dishonest, and it only furthers the claims of his supporters who cling to victimhood.
 
No, I didn't get that from the context of his speech at all.

There's no context to understand. I've watched the longer excerpts and still come back to the same conclusion, which is that the short snippet is still literally what he said and what he meant to say. This example is just as indicative of his authoritarian thinking as any other. That we're debating what he really meant in the context of what he was saying is indicative that it's a pretty effective gaslight.
 
Trump is a traitor.

And he does it for $$$$.
 
We'll agree to disagree. There is no way I could take the meaning of his comment as the one implied in the OP after listening to the entire speech.
 
We'll agree to disagree. There is no way I could take the meaning of his comment as the one implied in the OP after listening to the entire speech.

The comment itself is all that needs to be understood. What normal political figure in a modern liberal democracy would ever say that voting won't matter in four years? It's just such a jaw-dropping remark, except that it isn't because we're beginning to normalize it and internalize it as part of what passes for normal discourse.
 
Trump is falling apart before our eyes. He is the spoiled brat child who craves attention. His tantrums will only get worse.
 
Wow, I wasnt expecting that from you but it is good to see that there are still some libs out there capable of rational thought.
 
He was not talking about fixing the vote.....are you okay?
None of us know exactly what he was talking about. Having said that, what do YOU think he was talking about. There had to be SOME meaning to what he said.
 
None of us know exactly what he was talking about. Having said that, what do YOU think he was talking about. There had to be SOME meaning to what he said.
Yes, there are plenty of people who know what he was talking about and have tried to get you libs to understand. You guys dont want to know.
 
See post #101 and then keep reading.
 
Any comparison of trump to Hitler shows a level of ignorance that is disqualifying

Any comparison to Hitler shows ignorance? This statement of yours shows igriorance.

The comparison between Trump and Hitler may not be 100% but there are many things between the two that can be compared, meaning that that ignorance is yours by saying this statement,

Here are facts (not opinion) where some comparisons can be made, starting with the fact that Trump has clearly stated that there are many things about Hitler that he praises

Trump Apparently Has a List of Things He Loves About Adolf Hitler

Donald Trump's former chief of staff, John Kelly, says the former president used to praise lots of things about Hitler.

and here is a study about what Trump has done that compares to what Hitler did and there are quite a few comparisons

The reich stuff – what does Trump really have in common with Hitler?

Comparisons between the ex-president and the 20th-century Nazi leader are controversial but a new book says they resemble each other as political performance artists
 
Look, get out of the 50s menatality or Amerrica cannot move forward ever. Do some white people hate blacks? Yes. Do lots of black people hate whites because of positions like yours and MSM. Yes.

Get over it, dude.
Now there's some irony. The MAGA party of let's go back to when America was great (even though we can't say when that was) telling progressives to get out of the 50's. We left the 50's and 60's. Many of your group have not.

I am the first to admit not every cause championed by progressives were great ideas. But many were. And ALL were opposed by the conservatives who think like you- claiming the causes to be radical, unamerican, destined to destroy the fabric of America. Rinse and repeat. MAGA is just the latest iteration.

I wish sane, rational conservatives would step to the plate and end the cultlike travesty of MAGA, which has absolutely nothing to do with the greatness of America. MAGA brings out the absolute worst in Americans.
 
Yes, there are plenty of people who know what he was talking about and have tried to get you libs to understand. You guys dont want to know.
Well, I am asking so that means I want to know. If you KNOW what he meant, inform me.
 
Those reasons are that you simply refuse to believe anything that conflicts with your hatred of the man.

I hate what he says, what he does, how he thinks, how he lies, how his actions tried to nullify my vote and the votes of 81 million others. I hate what he represents, yes. It's not about personal hatred for the man.

You didn't really think about what I read. As it always is with Trump's defenders, you make excuses and you deflect because you're uncomfortable defending it, which is a good thing - you should be uncomfortable. But you still find reasons to defend and support him anyway.
 
You don't realize you are far left.
 
Trump (rapist/felon/cheated on his wife/paid off a porn star/massive liar/crook) still being a candidate is about the most evangelical thing we've ever seen.
 
You finding a liberal author who says the same stupid stuff as the rest of the left is not convincing.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…