• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Army veteran pleads to lesser charge in Syria fighting case (1 Viewer)

Montecresto

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 9, 2013
Messages
24,561
Reaction score
5,507
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
I wonder why he wasn't allowed to fight along side our ally's in Syria?


Washington (CNN) -- A former U.S. soldier accused of fighting with terrorists against Syrian forces pleaded guilty to a lesser charge and was released from custody.
Eric Harroun was sentenced to time served by a federal judge in Alexandria, Virginia, on Thursday.
Court documents showed he pleaded guilty to an export charge involving conspiracy to transfer defense articles and services.


Army veteran pleads to lesser charge in Syria fighting case - CNN.com
 
I wonder why he wasn't allowed to fight along side our ally's in Syria?


Washington (CNN) -- A former U.S. soldier accused of fighting with terrorists against Syrian forces pleaded guilty to a lesser charge and was released from custody.
Eric Harroun was sentenced to time served by a federal judge in Alexandria, Virginia, on Thursday.
Court documents showed he pleaded guilty to an export charge involving conspiracy to transfer defense articles and services.


Army veteran pleads to lesser charge in Syria fighting case - CNN.com

What gives the US any jurisdiction over what someone does outside of the US? The UCMJ does for our Military, but it only applies to military. Unless he broke a law while actually inside the US or violated the UCMJ while on active duty, then the US has absolutely no right to charge him with anything.
 
What gives the US any jurisdiction over what someone does outside of the US? The UCMJ does for our Military, but it only applies to military. Unless he broke a law while actually inside the US or violated the UCMJ while on active duty, then the US has absolutely no right to charge him with anything.


Sense when did jurisdiction ever stop the US from ****ing up anyone's parade?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom