Army stronk, says MAGA Kim

[joluoto]

North Korea: Kim Jong-un vows to build 'invincible military'​

Well all jokes aside, DPRK has under recent years went thorugh a military modernization process, and really aren't that far behind anymore.

 

[Fabiusbile]

North Korea: Kim Jong-un vows to build 'invincible military'​

Well all jokes aside, DPRK has under recent years went thorugh a military modernization process, and really aren't that far behind anymore.

Not so far behind who?
They were not going to fight with the United States anyway. Neither with Germany, nor with Finland.
It is not entirely clear what the unfortunate North Korea is terrible for the West. They make an enemy out of it so much, only North Korea has been waiting for an attack for many years.
Their conflict with South Korea is a conflict of one people, one elite divorced in different camps.
Why did the West wash its hands of Afghanistan and abandon its allies, and for some reason considers its presence mandatory in the Korean conflict?

 

[Mycroft]

North Korea: Kim Jong-un vows to build 'invincible military'​

Well all jokes aside, DPRK has under recent years went thorugh a military modernization process, and really aren't that far behind anymore.

Thanks to Biden's puppet masters, here we are...right back where we were before Trump changed the entire dynamics of the issue by way of his economic war with China.

Oh well...

 

[joluoto]

Thanks to Biden's puppet masters, here we are...right back where we were before Trump changed the entire dynamics of the issue by way of his economic war with China.

Oh well...

This is a process that has been going on for years. North Korean military modernization went on without any hitch during the Trump presidency.

 

[Tigerace117]

Not so far behind who?
They were not going to fight with the United States anyway. Neither with Germany, nor with Finland.
It is not entirely clear what the unfortunate North Korea is terrible for the West. They make an enemy out of it so much, only North Korea has been waiting for an attack for many years.
Their conflict with South Korea is a conflict of one people, one elite divorced in different camps.
Why did the West wash its hands of Afghanistan and abandon its allies, and for some reason considers its presence mandatory in the Korean conflict?

I hate to break it to you, but “only” brutally attacking South Korea, which has ZERO interest in being ruled by the Kim family cult, is still absolutely horrific.

 

[joluoto]

Thanks to Biden's puppet masters, here we are...right back where we were before Trump changed the entire dynamics of the issue by way of his economic war with China.

Oh well...

I could also remind you that the US-China trade war hasn't ended. It's still ongoing. The trade war that ended was the US- EU trade war.

 

[Mycroft]

I could also remind you that the US-China trade war hasn't ended. It's still ongoing. The trade war that ended was the US- EU trade war.

Keeping tariffs in place isn't keeping the trade war going. Trump was set to bring China to their knees. And yes...the EU dodged the bullet when election fraud was used to steal the election from Trump.

 

[mautzi]

The US Americans have raged so terribly in Korea that the Koreans suffer from a war trauma to this day. The many rapes and murders...

 

[Tigerace117]

The US Americans have raged so terribly in Korea that the Koreans suffer from a war trauma to this day. The many rapes and murders...

Oh look, a post straight out of Pyongyang. Hate to break it to you bud but the scale of North Korea’s war crimes in the conflict dwarf all others involved.

 

[Peter]

Thanks to Biden's puppet masters, here we are...right back where we were before Trump changed the entire dynamics of the issue by way of his economic war with China.

Oh well...

Considering how long it takes to design and build military equipment it seems odd to try and claim this has all been done during the last 18 months.
This buildup would have been in the planning stage for a decade at least.

 

[mautzi]

Oh look, a post straight out of Pyongyang. Hate to break it to you bud but the scale of North Korea’s war crimes in the conflict dwarf all others involved.

During the Korean War, from June 25, 1950, to July 27, 1953, the United States dropped a total of about 635,000 tons of bombs on major North Korean cities. Of these, 32,500 tons were incendiary bombs containing the chemical compound napalm. The latter in particular caused considerable damage to the mainly wooden buildings in North Korea.

This can hardly be topped.

 

[Tigerace117]

During the Korean War, from June 25, 1950, to July 27, 1953, the United States dropped a total of about 635,000 tons of bombs on major North Korean cities. Of these, 32,500 tons were incendiary bombs containing the chemical compound napalm. The latter in particular caused considerable damage to the mainly wooden buildings in North Korea.

This can hardly be topped.

Gee, sounds like North Korea shouldn’t have brutally invaded its neighbor. If the Kim family cult has stayed on its side of the border not a single bomb would have been dropped.

 

[post]

During the Korean War, from June 25, 1950, to July 27, 1953, the United States dropped a total of about 635,000 tons of bombs on major North Korean cities. Of these, 32,500 tons were incendiary bombs containing the chemical compound napalm. The latter in particular caused considerable damage to the mainly wooden buildings in North Korea.

This can hardly be topped.

Oh yeah? The U.S. exhibited enormous restraint, choosing to take avoidable casualties instead of....

How the Korean War Almost Went Nuclear

In 1950, Harry Truman had to decide whether to use B-29s to drop atomic bombs.

www.airspacemag.com

"....The airplane that had demonstrated that one bomber could destroy a city with one bomb would, it was assumed, hand the baton to a rising generation of bombers powered by jet engines. As it turned out, the B-29’s retirement didn’t last. Although underpowered and inclined to engine fires, the Superfortress remained America’s indispensable airplane—the only one in the world configured to deliver the enormous plutonium bombs of the day...

....the other korean waR—the nuclear one—had entered the strategic conversation as soon as North Korean troops crossed the 38th parallel, and persisted as a kind of play within a play.

By 1949, the Mark 4 plutonium bomb had replaced the demanding Mark 3 (see “How to Deploy a Mark 3” p. 36). About the same size as its predecessor, the new bomb was manufactured, not handmade, and easier to handle. By the time of the North Korean aggression, nearly 300 Mark 4 bombs were in the U.S. stockpile."

 

[mautzi]

Gee, sounds like North Korea shouldn’t have brutally invaded its neighbor. If the Kim family cult has stayed on its side of the border not a single bomb would have been dropped.

Well over 30% of the victims of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were Korean-born obligated contract workers.

 

[mautzi]

Due to the initiative of the USA, Korea was divided into two occupation zones. These machinations were in no way democratically legitimized. Only the Koreans had the right to choose their way through referendums and elections. Here also very clearly the hypocrisy and mendacity of the USA shows up, which places itself totalitarian ruling over peoples! But the world is announced they would be democrats.
However, the USA pulled Korea in her ideologically motivated machinations which had as a goal the world domination of her system.
As one can see today with China, China succeeds with its current system extremely efficiently to develop and to achieve progress. The Koreans could also have achieved what China has already achieved, no one needs the USA for that.
A U.S.-dominated South Korea is no proof that all of Korea would not have flourished in prosperity if the Koreans had gone their own way. As a neutral state between the blocs. As it is, the USA has achieved hatred, division and fanaticism. They have only made these conditions possible through their bestial war and mass murder in Korea.

Quite terrible, over 5 million dead Koreans, the whole country devastated, have they no shame?

 

[mautzi]

It is similar with many other countries. The USA, for example, have turned Cuba into a huge brothel. The people of Cuba were so pissed off that they had no choice but to go into total oposition instead of continuing to be raped.

 

[Tigerace117]

Well over 30% of the victims of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were Korean-born obligated contract workers.

Dropping the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki saved millions of lives. Projected Japanese casualties for Operation Downfall sat at five million minimum.

 

[Tigerace117]

Due to the initiative of the USA, Korea was divided into two occupation zones. These machinations were in no way democratically legitimized. Only the Koreans had the right to choose their way through referendums and elections. Here also very clearly the hypocrisy and mendacity of the USA shows up, which places itself totalitarian ruling over peoples! But the world is announced they would be democrats.
However, the USA pulled Korea in her ideologically motivated machinations which had as a goal the world domination of her system.
As one can see today with China, China succeeds with its current system extremely efficiently to develop and to achieve progress. The Koreans could also have achieved what China has already achieved, no one needs the USA for that.
A U.S.-dominated South Korea is no proof that all of Korea would not have flourished in prosperity if the Koreans had gone their own way. As a neutral state between the blocs. As it is, the USA has achieved hatred, division and fanaticism. They have only made these conditions possible through their bestial war and mass murder in Korea.

Quite terrible, over 5 million dead Koreans, the whole country devastated, have they

The Kim family cult and their Chinese sponsors certainly don’t have any shame about the way they wrecked North Korea, no.

 

[mautzi]

Dropping the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki saved millions of lives. Projected Japanese casualties for Operation Downfall sat at five million minimum.

This is bullshit, the US could have dropped the bombs on uninhabited areas or small cities to demonstrate the effect. But it was about targeted mass murder of the civilian population.
Just like in Europe, German residential areas were built as a model to optimize the efficiency of the fire and explosive bombs. So children and seniors in high numbers in a genocide to destroy. Considering the fact that the largest part of the us population comes from German-speaking areas, they did not hesitate to exterminate their own kind. That is still clearly more reprehensible than the Nazis, with whom during the east campaign, thus the total existence fight of the nation, with daily often thousands killed, also, in this connection, a certain number of Jews perished. Regrettably.

 

[mautzi]

They are just completely mentally neglected. But what should one expect from a state that is based on having exterminated millions of indigenous people on its territory, to then exploit millions of Negro slaves, to finally proceed to occupy parts of the world.

 

[Tigerace117]

This is bullshit, the US could have dropped the bombs on uninhabited areas or small cities to demonstrate the effect. But it was about targeted mass murder of the civilian population.
Just like in Europe, German residential areas were built as a model to optimize the efficiency of the fire and explosive bombs. So children and seniors in high numbers in a genocide to destroy. Considering the fact that the largest part of the us population comes from German-speaking areas, they did not hesitate to exterminate their own kind. That is still clearly more reprehensible than the Nazis, with whom during the east campaign, thus the total existence fight of the nation, with daily often thousands killed, also, in this connection, a certain number of Jews perished. Regrettably.

The Japanese regime had literally been urging its civilians— not just the military personnel, non-combatants as well— to commit suicide rather than allow themselves to be captured by Allied troops. They flat out wouldn’t have cared if some village of a few hundred people or some desolate mountain in the middle of nowhere got blown off the map. The targets needed to have actual military value in order to force Japan’s hand and make them surrender— hence the targeting of two major cities with significant military value. If it was really about “targeted mass murder” the US could have just sat around and waited while the Japanese populace starved.

The idea that the US was “exterminating” either the Japanese or German population is laughably dumb. They were fighting a war against genocidal dictatorships which between them had invaded much of the globe and which refused to surrender even though any sane individual could tell they’d lost the war. Claiming that it was “worse than the Holocaust”(and btw, both the Germans and Japanese murdered exponentially more civilians than died at Hiroshima and Nagasaki) is simply ignorant.

 

[mautzi]

The Japanese regime had literally been urging its civilians— not just the military personnel, non-combatants as well— to commit suicide rather than allow themselves to be captured by Allied troops. They flat out wouldn’t have cared if some village of a few hundred people or some desolate mountain in the middle of nowhere got blown off the map. The targets needed to have actual military value in order to force Japan’s hand and make them surrender— hence the targeting of two major cities with significant military value. If it was really about “targeted mass murder” the US could have just sat around and waited while the Japanese populace starved.

The idea that the US was “exterminating” either the Japanese or German population is laughably dumb. They were fighting a war against genocidal dictatorships which between them had invaded much of the globe and which refused to surrender even though any sane individual could tell they’d lost the war. Claiming that it was “worse than the Holocaust”(and btw, both the Germans and Japanese murdered exponentially more civilians than died at Hiroshima and Nagasaki) is simply ignorant.

One could also say that the USA helped the genocidal dictatorship of Stalin to victory, which resulted in the enslavement of half of Europe. Whereby the Stalinist regime demonstrably murdered significantly more people than the German dictatorship.

Finally the USA were not less racist than e.g. the NS state. The laws in the U.S. regarding its African American population were comparable to the Jewish laws in Nazi Germany. Furthermore, the USA and Great Britain prevented Jews from leaving Central Europe. Just as many countries refused to accept Jews. Concentration camps existed both from Great Britain as inventor during the Boer Wars and in the USA where the Japanese were interned. In the event that the USA lost the war, one does not need to have any illusions about how the conditions there would have looked.

In Japanese culture, suicide has a different meaning. To say that the Japanese government urged civilians to commit suicide is certainly not correct. Then they would not have surrendered. These are just insinuations that take advantage of cultural differences.
They only want to justify the criminal action of the USA, whereby it is clear that the USA were not better than the other war parties. What has been confirmed in the following history in Korea, Vietnam and in the wars in the Arab region.

 

[Tigerace117]

One could also say that the USA helped the genocidal dictatorship of Stalin to victory, which resulted in the enslavement of half of Europe. Whereby the Stalinist regime demonstrably murdered significantly more people than the German dictatorship.

Finally the USA were not less racist than e.g. the NS state. The laws in the U.S. regarding its African American population were comparable to the Jewish laws in Nazi Germany. Furthermore, the USA and Great Britain prevented Jews from leaving Central Europe. Just as many countries refused to accept Jews. Concentration camps existed both from Great Britain as inventor during the Boer Wars and in the USA where the Japanese were interned. In the event that the USA lost the war, one does not need to have any illusions about how the conditions there would have looked.

In Japanese culture, suicide has a different meaning. To say that the Japanese government urged civilians to commit suicide is certainly not correct. Then they would not have surrendered. These are just insinuations that take advantage of cultural differences.
They only want to justify the criminal action of the USA, whereby it is clear that the USA were not better than the other war parties. What has been confirmed in the following history in Korea, Vietnam and in the wars in the Arab region.

Stalin, for all his crimes, was still FAR better than Hitler....as shown, rather clearly, by the fact that he didn’t enslave and/or wipe out the German people once the Third Reich had been crushed. Hitler also accomplished his mass murder toll in a tiny fraction of the time the Soviets did; had he been allowed to stay in power, the death toll would have been exponentially higher.

Furthermore, the argument that there’s any equivalence between the US and Nazi Germany is laughable. Jim Crow was bad(to point out the glaringly obvious) but African Americans were able to freely work towards equality without any sort of government crackdown. No such freedom existed for the “undesirables” under the boot of the Nazi regime. Furthermore, unlike the Nazi death camps the Japanese American internment camps were not designed to wipe out a group of people(or any people for that matter), so your whataboutism falls flat on its face.

Uh....they absolutely did.

Japanese Mass Suicides - Nuclear Museum

The War of the Pacific against Imperial Japan was marked by episodes of mass suicides by Japanese soldiers and civilians, notably in Saipan and Okinawa.

www.atomicheritage.org

Historians battle over Okinawa WW2 mass suicides

Sumie Oshiro was 25 when she and her friends tried to kill themselves to avoid capture by U.S. soldiers at the start of the bloody Battle of Okinawa.

www.reuters.com

Told to commit suicide, survivors now face elimination from history

New mood in Tokyo to sanitise one of war's darkest episodes.

www.theguardian.com

Kinda hard to claim “cultural differences” when there are men with guns urging the civilians on.

There was NO equivalence between the US and the Nazi regime, nor the US and Imperial Japan. The laundry list of German and Japanese war crimes in the 1930s and 1940s dwarfs even the worst things US troops ever committed.

Try learning some actual history for a change.

 

[Fledermaus]

The US Americans have raged so terribly in Korea that the Koreans suffer from a war trauma to this day. The many rapes and murders...

Ummmmmmmmmm

Wut?

 

[Fledermaus]

One could also say that the USA helped the genocidal dictatorship of Stalin to victory, which resulted in the enslavement of half of Europe. Whereby the Stalinist regime demonstrably murdered significantly more people than the German dictatorship.

The NAZIS only had a few years to run up their numbers.

Finally the USA were not less racist than e.g. the NS state. The laws in the U.S. regarding its African American population were comparable to the Jewish laws in Nazi Germany. Furthermore, the USA and Great Britain prevented Jews from leaving Central Europe. Just as many countries refused to accept Jews. Concentration camps existed both from Great Britain as inventor during the Boer Wars and in the USA where the Japanese were interned. In the event that the USA lost the war, one does not need to have any illusions about how the conditions there would have looked.

US camps for the Japanese did not in any way resemble NAZI concentration camps where millions perished.

In Japanese culture, suicide has a different meaning. To say that the Japanese government urged civilians to commit suicide is certainly not correct. Then they would not have surrendered. These are just insinuations that take advantage of cultural differences.

Saipan, Okinawa.... You are incorrect.

They only want to justify the criminal action of the USA, whereby it is clear that the USA were not better than the other war parties. What has been confirmed in the following history in Korea, Vietnam and in the wars in the Arab region.

Please share this "criminal action" in Korea, etc.