It's very much in the public interest to have as much of the investigation visible as possible. If they genuinely find something they will need wide and open visibility for the findings to be seen as credible. If they don't find anything significant, the public needs enough visibility to see the truth past the inevitable political spin that will be created.
Every person who values democracy should be pushing for this 'audit' to be as public as possible. Those trying to hide it are likely those trying to defeat the democratic process.
Do you honestly believe the nonsense in Arizona is a real audit?It's very much in the public interest to have as much of the investigation visible as possible. If they genuinely find something they will need wide and open visibility for the findings to be seen as credible. If they don't find anything significant, the public needs enough visibility to see the truth past the inevitable political spin that will be created.
Every person who values democracy should be pushing for this 'audit' to be as public as possible. Those trying to hide it are likely those trying to defeat the democratic process.
okWe are NOT ninjas!
Ninjas are Japanese, we are Chinese.
Maybe we could have dramatic public readings of the correspondence between the Senate and the Ninjas. I'm sure some of it has comedic value!It's very much in the public interest to have as much of the investigation visible as possible. If they genuinely find something they will need wide and open visibility for the findings to be seen as credible. If they don't find anything significant, the public needs enough visibility to see the truth past the inevitable political spin that will be created.
Every person who values democracy should be pushing for this 'audit' to be as public as possible. Those trying to hide it are likely those trying to defeat the democratic process.
No, I don't personally believe that it is, but like most I have no hard evidence to base that assessment on. However, I'm not one of those needing convincing about the validity of any possible report. Those that do need convincing need to see more than just partisan rhetoric. The more visible and transparent the process is, the better the final impact should be.Do you honestly believe the nonsense in Arizona is a real audit?
The Arizona Senate is going to release the results of the audit in a hearing open to the public next Friday the 24th.
.
But, but, but BAMBOOOOOOO...news.yahoo.com › arizona-supreme-court-allowsArizona Supreme Court allows release of Senate audit records
18 hours ago · The Arizona Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected an effort by the state Senate to keep secret records of its ongoing review of the 2020 election in Maricopa County that are in the
This is great news. America can see that the GOP had no legitimate grounds to argue about the election in Maricopa County,
Kinda have to now... and it will be interesting to see what is and isn't released by the Republicans...The Arizona Senate is going to release the results of the audit in a hearing open to the public next Friday the 24th.
.
The court will order all of it released.Kinda have to now... and it will be interesting to see what is and isn't released by the Republicans...
That must fry a few MAGA chorizos...The court will order all of it released.
FYI - SCOTUS = Supreme Court Of The United States. The "SCOTUS" of Arizona is the same as every other state.news.yahoo.com › arizona-supreme-court-allowsArizona Supreme Court allows release of Senate audit records
18 hours ago · The Arizona Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected an effort by the state Senate to keep secret records of its ongoing review of the 2020 election in Maricopa County that are in the
This is great news. America can see that the GOP had no legitimate grounds to argue about the election in Maricopa County,
Interestingly, in 2016 Trump mini-me, Governor Doug Ducey, a big government authoritarian leaning Trump licker hiding behind a claim of a small government man of the people, stacked the AZ Supreme court by expanding it from 5 to 7 justices. Ducey did this against the wishes of Arizonans and against the wishes of the Arizona Supreme court. The move - the AZ Supreme Court argued - was unnecessary and expensive. The addition of 2 extra judges would - and now does - cost tax payers and additional $1,000,000 a year. No matter, Ducey did it anyway.Whatcha expect from dishonest, probably Leftist Activist Judges, spurred on by the MSM and the Deep State.
(I thought I would say it first because you know the types on here that will say it later)
Cyber Ninjas won’t hand over all of the documents that Senate President Karen Fann requested from the review it conducted of the 2020 election in Maricopa County, despite an order by the Arizona Court of Appeals that all such records be made public.
Attorney Jack Wilenchik, who represents the Florida-based company that led the election review that Fann ordered, argued to the Senate’s lawyer that the staffing records and internal communications are not public records, and said Cyber Ninjas will not turn them over as the Senate president requested.
The company will provide “full financial statements” about the audit, either as part of the report that will become public on Sept. 24, or shortly thereafter, Wilenchik wrote in an email to Senate attorney Kory Langhofer on Friday. And it will provide its communications with the Senate, which have not been made public, and any updated policies and procedures its subcontractors have used during the audit.
But staffing records, as well as internal communications and communications with subcontractors, are private records, Wilenchik wrote. For example, Wilenchik said it would not be “practical, workable, fair or legal” for the company to be forced to turn over internal company emails about staffing and Cyber Ninjas’ performance of its contract with the Senate.
“If the case were otherwise, then it would set an extremely unsettling precedent for all government contractors in this state and make it impossible for the State to do business,” Wilenchik wrote.
Furthermore, Wilenchik said Fann’s request for all records that have “a substantial nexus to the audit” — a phrase that the Arizona Court of Appeals used to describe documents that the Senate must obtain and publicly release under the state’s public records law — is vague and difficult to define.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?