• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Arizona "recount/audit" have stopped using ultraviolet and now checking "folds".

I

independentusa

DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 10, 2016
Messages
14,607
Reaction score
9,305
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
In the Arizona recount, they have stopped using the ultraviolet lights on the ballots. This might be because the ultraviolet lights might actually bleach out the color of the ink used to mark the ballots leaving what looks like a blank ballot. Now it seems to be all about the folds in the ballots and some invention by some person who was a failed inventor and now writes seemingly bogus treasure hunting books. And this is how the GOP is going to overturn an election that was obviously won by Biden. Yu can not help stupid.
 
That "useless inventor" is the guy who invented the QR Code.
 
Let me guess : if the ninjas look at the ballots at just the right angle, Chancellor Squirrelhead actually won while losing.
 
OMG. my ballot had folds. It had to be because it was a mail in ballot. Came that way. Had to be refolded to put back in a mailing envelop.

I have been following this "audit" since Fann decided to go forward with it. Fann said it would be bipartisan and transparent. imo, it is far from it.

What is most bothersome is the secrecy of the inspection of the voting equipment.
/sarcasm on
What are they hiding? What are they doing? Have they "rigged" the equipment to support the conclusion of the leader of Cyber Ninjas? Why no observers?
/sarcasm off
 
- Instead of counting all 2.1M ballots by hand. Why not take a multiple samples of X amount. Hand count them and then run them through the voting machines. If the hand count and the machine count are the same for each candidate would that not indicate the machines are operating properly?
(Some math wiz could come up with the proper sample sizes for the 2.1M votes).

- Cyber Ninjas could also run a multiple test sample to check the equipment. Oh wait, that was already done multiple times as outlined in AZ election procedures.

How many believe that Cyber Ninjas report is going to come out with results saying they found something suspicious and most likely the count from the election was not correct.
 

This is totally not turning into a cartoon.
 
Mycroft said:
My mistake...it's CRQ code.

Wikipedia Profile For Jovan Hutton Pulitzer

wikipedia.jovanhuttonpulitzer.org
Click to expand...

This guy.

"We’ll definitely grant that Pulitzer does have some credentials in the world of technology. He’s responsible for the CueCat: a cat-shaped barcode scanner that is widely regarded as one of the worst gadgets ever made. In a 2000 Wall Street Journal review, renowned technology journalist Walt Mossberg wrote that the CueCat was “unnatural and ridiculous.” Rob Beschizza of BoingBoing calls it “one of the classic crap gadgets.” And TIME named it one of “the 50 worst inventions.”"

Trump’s fight to overthrow election now falls to the guy who invented the CueCat

Fittingly, the CueCat is widely regarded as one of the worst gadgets ever made
www.theverge.com
 
Mycroft said:
That "useless inventor" is the guy who invented the QR Code.
Click to expand...
wrong, he took the already existing bar code and built a code reader that looked like a cat that did not sell. Why a cat, no one knows.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…