• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Are we really going to be a people without a party?

And if you keep insisting on pushing hate, it's going to get even worse.

 
So you think America benefits from 100% Leftist rule and completely shut out Conservatives?

If you can't sell people on your ideas, you're going to get voted down.
 
You equate Truth with hate? No wonder Satan likes you.

I am unimpressed with your bronze age religion, whichever side you choose to associate me with.
 
Only because of the far left indoctrination by the (Mis)education system. Had our schools remained 100% in local control, we would not have this problem

Is Rightwing indoctrination okay?

You've yet to answer my question: why is it okay for heteros to "shove their lifestyle in people's faces", but the same isn't true for gays?
 
Problem is, third parties never make it to the national stage. Not to mention the logistical nightmare that always happens when you have 15-20 parties like that.
You need to have some kind of lower limit, in Sweden we have 4% off the population. And we have 8 different parties. Off course sometimes it is hard to get a majority that works well together and the parties has to compromise within coalitions, but that is done in the open and if their voters doesn’t like the compromises they make, it will show in next election. The compromises is happening within your politics as well, they are just made within the republican and the democrat parties and behind closed doors, not to be communicated.
 
Is Rightwing indoctrination okay?

You've yet to answer my question: why is it okay for heteros to "shove their lifestyle in people's faces", but the same isn't true for gays?
Simple answer because heterosexual relations do not pervert God's purposes for sex. Anything outside of His design is sin, be it fornication, bestiality, homosexuality, etc.
 
Only because of the far left indoctrination by the (Mis)education system. Had our schools remained 100% in local control, we would not have this problem

“100% local control“ proved mutually exclusive with the Constitutional rights of Americans. You can blame your fellow conservatives and Jim Crow for that.
 
Simple answer because heterosexual relations do not pervert God's purposes for sex. Anything outside of His design is sin, be it fornication, bestiality, homosexuality, etc.

Why should anyone care about anything your unproven god supposedly says or believes?
 
Worrying about the Libertarian Party is like worrying about the Green Party. They will only exist as the last flailing option of frustrated voters.
 

With some calling for the end of the Republican Party, there have been those encouraging the Libertarian Party to step up. There's just one small problem. The Libertarian Party seems to want to walk in complete lockstep with the Democrats on social issues, so where does that leave us, when we have a society that won't accept the fact there are people who really give a damn about the moral decay in America.

When the abolitionists won, where did that leave those who supported the preservation of slavery?
 
Because there's also scientific fact! Heterosexual married couples have far longer lifespans, way less susceptible to STDs, and so forth.


By that standard, we should reinstate prohibition.
 
Because there's also scientific fact! Heterosexual married couples have far longer lifespans, way less susceptible to STDs, and so forth.

People who dont drink live longer


Outlaw the booze!!!!!!
 

From 2017. Liberals have done nothing BUT attack the Church!
That is not possible. Whoever attacks the church can't be liberal since the ideology of liberals gives religious freedom. If it does not, it is not liberalism by definition.
 
Because there's also scientific fact! Heterosexual married couples have far longer lifespans, way less susceptible to STDs, and so forth.

Lesbians have the lowest rates of STD's on the planet. So by your logic, we should be encouraging women to be lesbians, yes?
 
NOT a bad idea. Impractical, but not a bad idea.

Yes, it was such a good idea the last time around. Those of you who insist on dictating morality never seem to learn from experience.
 
So you think America benefits from 100% Leftist rule and completely shut out Conservatives?

You can support gay marriage and still be a conservative in every other way. But yes, America would benefit from 100% support for same-sex marriage.
 
Lesbians have the lowest rates of STD's on the planet. So by your logic, we should be enc.ouraging women to be lesbians, yes?
It would prohibit unwanted pregnancies and the need for abortion aswell. Done deal
 

From 2017. Liberals have done nothing BUT attack the Church!

Which church?

I have no problem with the Universalists, for example.
 
Back
Top Bottom