- Joined
- Sep 13, 2007
- Messages
- 79,903
- Reaction score
- 20,981
- Location
- I love your hate.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
I’m not an Obama supporter, so that’s not where my observation comes from. Your OP is obviously anti Obama, that’s all…
Peace
Why do the libs throw out Limbaugh in defending Pres Doofus? Do they think Limbaugh's position is equivelent to the Presidency? He is an entertainer that has never run for public office. :roll:
Limbaugh is successful precisely because he points out the faults of the libs.
They hate him.
They can't understand his popularity.
And they feel that because they have an emotional irrational attachment to dear little Obie that real Americans must have a similar feeling towards Limbaugh, as if we're the emotional unthinking robots they are.
Are you Truth Detector? :shock:Limbaugh is successful precisely because he points out the faults of the libs.
They hate him.
They can't understand his popularity.
And they feel that because they have an emotional irrational attachment to dear little Obie that real Americans must have a similar feeling towards Limbaugh, as if we're the emotional unthinking robots they are.
I understand his popularity completely. He's popular for the same reason that Ann Coulter is. He says outrageous things. He is sensationalism incarnate. They are both very clever because they realize that the more outrageous they are the more people on both sides are going to listen. It's the same reason Howard Stern was so popular. Nobody on the left has the balls to go as far as those two have gone and I doubt there ever will be anyone like that.
Are you Truth Detector? :shock:
Oh, sorry. Don't mind me, I'm just a robot.Is that the name you see next to my posts?
I have no idea why Skinny Legs is so popular. She's caused way more damage to the cause of freedom than she's been able to make up for. Limbaugh at least has the decency to be funny.
Also, almost all of the negative things they say Rush has said has to be taken out of context. Of course he said he hopes Obie will fail. What he said was that since Obie's plans are going to hurt the country, he hopes Obie will fail.
Context is the key.
Skinny is a blemish, nothing more.
Are you Truth Detector? :shock:
Yeah, this totally threw me off:I can understand the confusion, but you will know when TD posts. In all of Scarecrow's posts there is nary a "carry on" to be found.
Are you Truth Detector? :shock:
No, I honestly thought that maybe you guys got the same talking points by mistake.Trolling and baiting again? :2wave:
Well, I thought the whole thing he said about Michael J. Fox was pretty outrageous. I'm sure that was just a ratings goldmine for him, though.
No, I honestly thought that maybe you guys got the same talking points by mistake.
What were the terrible things Rush said? Was it the part where he suggested that in order for Michael to make a bigger emotional appeal he was perhaps not on his drugs during the commercial in order to have a greater impact?
Yeah, you're right. It's perfectly okay to mock a guy with Parkinson's just because you don't agree with his political message. And it has already been proven that the medication is what makes him do that, not a lack of medication.
Appeal to emotion? Cute.Sure, why not, when that guy is telling the world that if only we killed more babies he might get cured of his twitchiness.
And Rush does Drugs too ´cept he dont take them for any illness, other than Addiction to Opioid´sWhat were the terrible things Rush said? Was it the part where he suggested that in order for Michael to make a bigger emotional appeal he was perhaps not on his drugs during the commercial in order to have a greater impact?
Sure, why not, when that guy is telling the world that if only we killed more babies he might get cured of his twitchiness.
If he's willing to prostitute himself for his cause, why shouldn't we make fun of him?
Yeah, you're right. It's perfectly okay to mock a guy with Parkinson's just because you don't agree with his political message. And it has already been proven that the medication is what makes him do that, not a lack of medication.
And Rush does Drugs too ´cept he dont take them for any illness, other than Addiction to Opioid´s
Because there's a little thing called being an adult and attacking his message if you don't agree with it rather than him and his illness.
You seem to be the one getting riled up, not dcxlvnoise.How was he being mocked? Did Rush say; "look at that retard, he's faking it?"
No, he merely suggested that in order to have a greater effect, he allowed himself to be recorded with his "tic" in order to appeal to emotions rather than the facts of the cause he supported.
He also suggested that he had done plenty of other appearances completely normal and without evidence of having the "tic." How is this mocking him?
I am always amused at the emotional hysterics of Liberals who when called on their tactics become hurt and insulted.
The debate about embryonic cell research was based on a lie: That President Bush was denying funding for it, and that it was somehow this miraculous cure for conditions that Michael suffered from.
The truth was that Bush merely refused Federal Tax Payer funding for the research on moral grounds which, if it was such a miracle cure, can easily find PRIVATE funding. The other TRUTH is that to date, there has been ZERO evidence that embryonic stem cells are any better at cures than adult stem cells.
So aside from all the emotional hyperbole you bring, how was this in the least way mocking Michael?
How was he being mocked? Did Rush say; "look at that retard, he's faking it?"
No, he merely suggested that in order to have a greater effect, he allowed himself to be recorded with his "tic" in order to appeal to emotions rather than the facts of the cause he supported.
He also suggested that he had done plenty of other appearances completely normal and without evidence of having the "tic." How is this mocking him?
I am always amused at the emotional hysterics of Liberals who when called on their tactics become hurt and insulted.
The debate about embryonic cell research was based on a lie: That President Bush was denying funding for it, and that it was somehow this miraculous cure for conditions that Michael suffered from.
The truth was that Bush merely refused Federal Tax Payer funding for the research on moral grounds which, if it was such a miracle cure, can easily find PRIVATE funding. The other TRUTH is that to date, there has been ZERO evidence that embryonic stem cells are any better at cures than adult stem cells.
So aside from all the emotional hyperbole you bring, how was this in the least way mocking Michael?
You seem to be the one getting riled up, not dcxlvnoise.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?