- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 281,619
- Reaction score
- 100,389
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Does it start by claiming the right to declare anyone a terrorist and lock them up without a trial?
Elections are not the only way in which your voice can be heard. MLK did not vote yet he led the movement that created the Civil Rights Act. They fired not one bullet, although some were fired upon them, and they were victorious nonetheless.Every 2, 4 and 6 years Americans have an opportunity to have a non-violent revolution OR to not have a revolution. That's what elections are. On the fringe are people who if they don't get their way in the elections think they should then get their guns.
People who claim guns are necessary to keep government in check are particularly dangerous people. Foolish too. Borrowing from the movie "The Aviator." The government beat Germany and Japan. Who are you thinking you and yours can stop the government with a gun?
They beat Germany and Japan with our support. If you want to know what happens when the government fights a war without the backing of the people, look at Vietnam.
Why is that?and I know why the architect of pearl harbor cautioned against his armed forces trying to invade America
Why is that?
okay, I honestly was curiousbecause the admiral noted that invading America would mean that the Japanese army would find a "gun behind every blade of grass" aimed at them
\okay, I honestly was curious
Thunder hates the right to keep and bear arms. He has admitted that-he says NYC's idiotic licensing requirement law is proper
Someone who speaks with a forked tongue. Just like someone else we all know.
please don't lie about my views, as I don't lie about yours.
why are you posting here when you haven't voted?
You are on record as defending the NYC's idiotic laws concerning guns
yeah, which just proves that you have lied about my views.
so you now deny that you support the NYC licensing requirements? the ones that require people to have a license that the NYPD can deny for any reason?
unless it is a SHALL ISSUE law, then you can be denied for any reasonand now, you are being dishonest about the NYPD's gun regulations.
unless it is a SHALL ISSUE law, then you can be denied for any reason
but lets get back on topic
do you support the NYC gun laws?
The whole part about belonging to a well-regulated militia too?
that has nothing to do with the right's application
unless it is a SHALL ISSUE law, then you can be denied for any reason...
ANY reason?
prove it. I think you're just making it up.
Funny, that's exactly how it's written. Now while I have absolutely nothing against the right to bear arms, we are talking about the second amendment AS WRITTEN, not as later interpreted. At the time, the people were the military. Well, the white, male, property-owners were the military. They owned all of the arms, including cannons, and brought them out for national defense. It was a system that made sense to the founding fathers. They had no concept of a standing army. Unfortunately, modern people kind of gloss over the "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state" part because it's inconvenient. However, it is as the founding fathers intended it.
unless it is a SHALL ISSUE law, then you can be denied for any reason...
ANY reason?
prove it. I think you're just making it up.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?