- Joined
- Jul 22, 2009
- Messages
- 1,799
- Reaction score
- 272
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Are name brands superior?
Possibly my palate isn’t as discriminating that of many other people. I often cannot detect any appreciable differences of tastes or other attributes between many “name brand” products. For some products I actually do detect a difference and prefer the “generic house brand to the name brand (without even considering any difference in cost).
I don’t recall what food product it was that I (untypically) determined that a “packer’s label” food product I purchased at a “Key Food” super market was inferior to name brands of a similar type product.
[Generic House brands are the store’s own label. I believe chain stores often purchased from the same producer as the name brand. I also believe that in most cases the purchasing orders specify the exact quality as the “name brand” and it’s conceivable that the purchasing order’s specification explicitly refer to the competing name brand by its advertised name.
Packers’ labels are excess or additional products that were branded with the producer’s own (rather than the advertised name brand label).
In all of these cases there’s substantial cost savings due to production lines’ economies of (greater) scales and little if any advertising expenses)]. The store obtains their house brand products at a cheaper price due to the leverage of the store chain’s large purchasing quantities and/or there’s little or no advertising expenses attributed to the each per unit of the non-name branded product].
Someone, (I think it might have been Voltaire) who wrote “In questions of taste there should be no argument”. On occasion I do encounter some products that I do detect, appreciate and am willing to pay the difference for the “name brand”. There are other products that I appreciate the difference but I’m unwilling or in some cases unable to pay the difference in price.
I like marmalade and very much prefer the less sweet English marmalade. We use so much of it in our household and the difference in price is so great that I sacrifice the superior taste and purchase the American house brand marmalade.
When I was a smoker, I did find an acceptable lesser if generally unknown brand of cigars; I don’t trust my memory but I think it might have been named “El Cuno”. There was only one place I found it and they didn’t carry the more superior that I prefer. I originally bought a few until I could obtain the better cigars I was accustomed to. Even after I became aware of this cigar’s quality, I continued to prefer spending the additional cost for a better cigar.
Early in our marriage, our landlord wanted to us to vacate. He wanted the apartment for his own family's member. I was a stepfather with 2 children. A house rather than another apartment seemed a more practical choice. When we moved, we didn’t even have the price of furniture.
We threw “bottle parties”. We served buffets on the kitchen table. My wife prepared the food herself and it we served buffets on from our kitchen table. It was (BYOB), Bring Your Own Bottles parties. People generally do not take unfinished bottles with them when they leave.
One rainy cold evening after the children were asleep, my wife and I decided to have a blind cognac tasting. We watch poured cognac in small paper cups marked with different letters. Neither one knew what brands were being poured in each of our sets of cups. We then tasted the contents of teach others’ set of cups and noted the letters of each cup in the order of our taste evaluations.
The only non-major cognac brand that was among our top four preferences was (I believe recalling) “Gold leaf” cognac; but gold leaf was also approaching the prices of the major brands.
There was little to choose between the tastes of Remny or Couvoursair cognacs. They were both excellent and very far superior to Hennessey’s cognac. All three of those cognacs sell for similar prices but unlike Hennessey’s, the other two have a much lesser USA advertising budgets. Hennessey’s is the much more advertised cognac in the USA.
It was clear to my wife and myself that Hennessey was heavily investing for advertising at the expense of their product’s quality. It was obviously a greatly inferior product among the major cognac brands sold within the USA.
Many Americans do not know that you can pay more for some things and still remain with much inferior product. Madison Avenue would prefer we believe they promote better products rather than that they in most cases promote higher distribution prices and/or inferior quality products for the sake of increased advertising budgets.
Respectfully, Supposn
Possibly my palate isn’t as discriminating that of many other people. I often cannot detect any appreciable differences of tastes or other attributes between many “name brand” products. For some products I actually do detect a difference and prefer the “generic house brand to the name brand (without even considering any difference in cost).
I don’t recall what food product it was that I (untypically) determined that a “packer’s label” food product I purchased at a “Key Food” super market was inferior to name brands of a similar type product.
[Generic House brands are the store’s own label. I believe chain stores often purchased from the same producer as the name brand. I also believe that in most cases the purchasing orders specify the exact quality as the “name brand” and it’s conceivable that the purchasing order’s specification explicitly refer to the competing name brand by its advertised name.
Packers’ labels are excess or additional products that were branded with the producer’s own (rather than the advertised name brand label).
In all of these cases there’s substantial cost savings due to production lines’ economies of (greater) scales and little if any advertising expenses)]. The store obtains their house brand products at a cheaper price due to the leverage of the store chain’s large purchasing quantities and/or there’s little or no advertising expenses attributed to the each per unit of the non-name branded product].
Someone, (I think it might have been Voltaire) who wrote “In questions of taste there should be no argument”. On occasion I do encounter some products that I do detect, appreciate and am willing to pay the difference for the “name brand”. There are other products that I appreciate the difference but I’m unwilling or in some cases unable to pay the difference in price.
I like marmalade and very much prefer the less sweet English marmalade. We use so much of it in our household and the difference in price is so great that I sacrifice the superior taste and purchase the American house brand marmalade.
When I was a smoker, I did find an acceptable lesser if generally unknown brand of cigars; I don’t trust my memory but I think it might have been named “El Cuno”. There was only one place I found it and they didn’t carry the more superior that I prefer. I originally bought a few until I could obtain the better cigars I was accustomed to. Even after I became aware of this cigar’s quality, I continued to prefer spending the additional cost for a better cigar.
Early in our marriage, our landlord wanted to us to vacate. He wanted the apartment for his own family's member. I was a stepfather with 2 children. A house rather than another apartment seemed a more practical choice. When we moved, we didn’t even have the price of furniture.
We threw “bottle parties”. We served buffets on the kitchen table. My wife prepared the food herself and it we served buffets on from our kitchen table. It was (BYOB), Bring Your Own Bottles parties. People generally do not take unfinished bottles with them when they leave.
One rainy cold evening after the children were asleep, my wife and I decided to have a blind cognac tasting. We watch poured cognac in small paper cups marked with different letters. Neither one knew what brands were being poured in each of our sets of cups. We then tasted the contents of teach others’ set of cups and noted the letters of each cup in the order of our taste evaluations.
The only non-major cognac brand that was among our top four preferences was (I believe recalling) “Gold leaf” cognac; but gold leaf was also approaching the prices of the major brands.
There was little to choose between the tastes of Remny or Couvoursair cognacs. They were both excellent and very far superior to Hennessey’s cognac. All three of those cognacs sell for similar prices but unlike Hennessey’s, the other two have a much lesser USA advertising budgets. Hennessey’s is the much more advertised cognac in the USA.
It was clear to my wife and myself that Hennessey was heavily investing for advertising at the expense of their product’s quality. It was obviously a greatly inferior product among the major cognac brands sold within the USA.
Many Americans do not know that you can pay more for some things and still remain with much inferior product. Madison Avenue would prefer we believe they promote better products rather than that they in most cases promote higher distribution prices and/or inferior quality products for the sake of increased advertising budgets.
Respectfully, Supposn
Last edited: