- Joined
- Jan 21, 2009
- Messages
- 65,981
- Reaction score
- 23,408
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
The project slowly creeps forward to a conclusion...
Matching a motor to a propeller (impeller on jet drive) is a real challenge. I known nothing of engine management computers and the motor is completely dependent upon it - PRECISELY. There have now been 14 short "sea trials" to collect info to send to another company via the Internet to be analyzed - and then the next firmware tried. The goal? Wide open at 8600 - but no more for sustained use. If the prop is too small it will just cavitate and if too much it can't build the rpms, while trying to balance that to the firmware (programming.)
Each requires pulling the engine management computer, taking it to the shop, overwriting it, putting it back in and another sea trial.
They about got it in terms of the engine management firmware that finds this motor's sweet spot across the rpms in terms of fuel-air ratio and impeller/jet drive liner inner diameter - and with the largest, most aggressive propeller and largest diameter jet drive. At 8600 rpms it was pushing out the drive water with such pressure it blew off the directional nozzle. While the rear gates sometimes get blown off for not fully lifting it after reversing, blowing off the nozzle is a new one for all involved. Never heard of that happening before.
Candidly, I just wanted it to be made super reliable and a strong cut above stock - specifically so that no OEM factory jet skis - with as much as 300 hp and are much lighter with far less wetted surface area - aren't leaving me in their rearview mirror. Generally I don't care about speed. My Bass Tracker can't keep up with turkey ducks (as we call them) dashing just above the water heading for their roost.
I wonder if in this increasingly eccentric project of extremes, am I pursuing what ultimately could be the instrument of my own death? Past 70mph the hull will rapidly become unstable - trying more and more to do a full 90 degree turn while increasingly wobbling side to side - on smooth water. The water offshore is never "smooth" and clearly this will have the power potential to go well over 70. I'm mature enough hopefully to know better than to go faster than is safe - plus my back can't take hard wave pounding for long. But this is NOT a vessel to let young people use.
So if I just stop posting some day, it could very well be accurate to post "that nutcase probably killed himself in some weird little boat he was messing with. LOL. " I suppose that's not the worst possible epitaph,
Matching a motor to a propeller (impeller on jet drive) is a real challenge. I known nothing of engine management computers and the motor is completely dependent upon it - PRECISELY. There have now been 14 short "sea trials" to collect info to send to another company via the Internet to be analyzed - and then the next firmware tried. The goal? Wide open at 8600 - but no more for sustained use. If the prop is too small it will just cavitate and if too much it can't build the rpms, while trying to balance that to the firmware (programming.)
Each requires pulling the engine management computer, taking it to the shop, overwriting it, putting it back in and another sea trial.
They about got it in terms of the engine management firmware that finds this motor's sweet spot across the rpms in terms of fuel-air ratio and impeller/jet drive liner inner diameter - and with the largest, most aggressive propeller and largest diameter jet drive. At 8600 rpms it was pushing out the drive water with such pressure it blew off the directional nozzle. While the rear gates sometimes get blown off for not fully lifting it after reversing, blowing off the nozzle is a new one for all involved. Never heard of that happening before.
Candidly, I just wanted it to be made super reliable and a strong cut above stock - specifically so that no OEM factory jet skis - with as much as 300 hp and are much lighter with far less wetted surface area - aren't leaving me in their rearview mirror. Generally I don't care about speed. My Bass Tracker can't keep up with turkey ducks (as we call them) dashing just above the water heading for their roost.
I wonder if in this increasingly eccentric project of extremes, am I pursuing what ultimately could be the instrument of my own death? Past 70mph the hull will rapidly become unstable - trying more and more to do a full 90 degree turn while increasingly wobbling side to side - on smooth water. The water offshore is never "smooth" and clearly this will have the power potential to go well over 70. I'm mature enough hopefully to know better than to go faster than is safe - plus my back can't take hard wave pounding for long. But this is NOT a vessel to let young people use.
So if I just stop posting some day, it could very well be accurate to post "that nutcase probably killed himself in some weird little boat he was messing with. LOL. " I suppose that's not the worst possible epitaph,
Last edited: